Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes

W. Yuan; S. Liu; G. Zhou; L.L. Tieszen; D. Baldocchi; C. Bernhofer; H. Gholz; Allen H. Goldstein; M. L. Goulden; D.Y. Hollinger; Y. Hu; B. E. Law; Paul C. Stoy; T. Vesala; S.C. Wofsy

doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.001

USGS · 70029894

Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes

W. Yuan·S. Liu·G. Zhou·L.L. Tieszen·D. Baldocchi·C. Bernhofer·H. Gholz·Allen H. Goldstein·M. L. Goulden·D.Y. Hollinger·Y. Hu·B. E. Law·Paul C. Stoy·T. Vesala·S.C. Wofsy

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The quantitative simulation of gross primary production (GPP) at various spatial and temporal scales has been a major challenge in quantifying the global carbon cycle. We developed a light use efficiency (LUE) daily GPP model from eddy covariance (EC) measurements. The model, called EC-LUE, is driven by only four variables: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), air temperature, and the Bowen ratio of sensible to latent heat flux (used to calculate moisture stress). The EC-LUE model relies on two assumptions: First, that the fraction of absorbed PAR (fPAR) is a linear function of NDVI; Second, that the realized light use efficiency, calculated from a biome-independent invariant potential LUE, is controlled by air temperature or soil moisture, whichever is most limiting. The EC-LUE model was calibrated and validated using 24,349 daily GPP estimates derived from 28 eddy covariance flux towers from the AmeriFlux and EuroFlux networks, covering a variety of forests, grasslands and savannas. The model explained 85% and 77% of the observed variations of daily GPP for all the calibration and validation sites, respectively. A comparison with GPP calculated from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) indicated that the EC-LUE model predicted GPP that better matched tower data across these sites. The realized LUE was predominantly controlled by moisture conditions throughout the growing season, and controlled by temperature only at the beginning and end of the growing season. The EC-LUE model is an alternative approach that makes it possible to map daily GPP over large areas because (1) the potential LUE is invariant across various land cover types and (2) all driving forces of the model can be derived from remote sensing data or existing climate observation networks.

Explore related subjects

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W. Yuan, S. Liu, G. Zhou, L.L. Tieszen, D. Baldocchi, C. Bernhofer, H. Gholz, Allen H. Goldstein, M. L. Goulden, D.Y. Hollinger, Y. Hu, B. E. Law, Paul C. Stoy, T. Vesala, S.C. Wofsy. 2007. Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Lowland tropical forests remain a methane sink under warming and long-term hurricane disturbance recovery

Methane (CH 4 ) is a potent greenhouse gas, and tropical forests account for roughly one–third of global atmospheric CH 4 uptake by soils. Projected warming and more frequent hurricanes in these ecosystems may alter soil CH 4 sink strength, as warmer and wetter soils enhance methanogenesis activity. We measured soil CH 4 and CO 2 efflux during the calendar summer months of 2023 and 2024 alongside continuous records of soil moisture, soil and air temperature, and precipitation in an in–situ warming experiment (TRACE) located in a lowland tropical forest in Puerto Rico, six to seven years after Hurricanes Irma and Maria (2017). The realized warming (∼1.95°C) enhanced soil respiration only in summer 2023 ( p < 0.05), but net soil CH 4 uptake was invariant in both campaigns ( p > 0.05). Instead, sampling day and between–plot variability explained soil CH 4 dynamics much more than treatment contrasts. Importantly, CH 4 uptake was consistently coupled to CO 2 efflux, suggesting tight linkages between methanotrophic and heterotrophic activities. Between treatments, CH 4 and CO 2 responses to soil temperature variation were less sensitive in warmed plots, which may suggest weak metabolic upregulation under elevated temperatures. Together, these findings indicate that lowland tropical soils remain CH 4 sink even under warming and years after hurricane disturbance, with CH 4 dynamics driven more by spatial and temporal variability than experimental warming. Long–term, high–resolution monitoring integrating soil biogeochemistry and microbial processes will be critical to determine whether the observed net CH 4 uptake signal represents a sustainable or transient response under continued warming and disturbance.

Puerto Rico, Sabana Field Research Station↗

USGS2025

Network of networks: Time series clustering of AmeriFlux sites

Environmental observation networks, such as AmeriFlux, are foundational for monitoring ecosystem response to climate change, management practices, and natural disturbances; however, their effectiveness depends on their representativeness for the regions or continents. We proposed an empirical, time series approach to quantify the similarity of ecosystem fluxes across AmeriFlux sites. We extracted the diel and seasonal characteristics (i.e., amplitudes, phases) from carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy, and momentum fluxes, which reflect the effects of climate, plant phenology, and ecophysiology on the observations, and explored the potential aggregations of AmeriFlux sites through hierarchical clustering. While net radiation and temperature showed latitudinal clustering as expected, flux variables revealed a more uneven clustering with many small (number of sites < 5), unique groups and a few large (> 100) to intermediate (15–70) groups, highlighting the significant ecological regulations of ecosystem fluxes. Many identified unique groups were from under-sampled ecoregions and biome types of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), with distinct flux dynamics compared to the rest of the network. At the finer spatial scale, local topography, disturbance, management, edaphic, and hydrological regimes further enlarge the difference in flux dynamics within the groups. Nonetheless, our clustering approach is a data-driven method to interpret the AmeriFlux network, informing future cross-site syntheses, upscaling, and model-data benchmarking research. Finally, we highlighted the unique and underrepresented sites in the AmeriFlux network, which were found mainly in Hawaii and Latin America, mountains, and at under-sampled IGBP types (e.g., urban, open water), motivating the incorporation of new/unregistered sites from these groups.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology↗

USGS2025

Beyond optimality: Dryland ecosystems infrequently use water efficiently for carbon gain

Optimality theory assumes plants maximize carbon gain per unit water lost and is often implemented to scale leaf-level carbon gain and water use to regional and global scales. Optimality theory is often mathematically represented by assuming plant water-use efficiency (WUE) scales with VPD k , where k = ½ represents expected optimal behavior. It is unclear, however, if this relationship holds in arid and semi-arid ecosystems that are strongly impacted by soil and atmospheric moisture status. We used data from seven flux tower sites along an aridity gradient in New Mexico to answer: how does the relationship between WUE and VPD compare to expectations based on optimality theory? To address this question, we integrated the Dynamic Evapotranspiration Partitioning Approach for Rapid Timescales with a stochastic antecedent model to estimate ecosystem-level WUE (GPP/T) and the net sensitivity of WUE to VPD, or k Dynamic , which we compare to the theoretical optimal sensitivity of k = ½. Our results show that optimality theory is not always appropriate, and k Dynamic often deviates from ½, especially at some of the more arid sites or during periods of low soil moisture. At less arid, higher elevation sites, k Dynamic is most consistent with optimality theory at moderate VPD levels, but not at high VPD. In general, the sensitivity of WUE to VPD is highly variable such that k Dynamic exhibits notable daily and seasonal variability, suggesting highly dynamic stomatal behavior. These results emphasize that representing plant water-use strategies as dynamic in time and space is critical to improving large-scale estimates of plant water use.

New Mexico↗