Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70028142

Geology and geochemistry of jasperoids from the Gold Bar district, Nevada

O. Yigit·A. H. Hofstra·M.W. Hitzman·E.P. Nelson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Gold Bar is one of several Carlin-type gold mining districts located in the Battle Mountain-Eureka trend, Nevada. It is composed of one main deposit, Gold Bar; five satellite deposits; and four resources that contain 1.6 Moz (50 t) of gold. All of the deposits and resources occur at the intersection of north-northwest- and northeast-trending high-angle faults in slope facies limestones of the Devonian Nevada Group exposed in windows through Ordovician basin facies siliciclastic rocks of the Roberts Mountains allochthon. Igneous intrusions and magnetic anomalies are notably absent. The Gold Bar district contains a variety of discordant and stratabound jasperoid bodies, especially along the Wall Fault zone, that were mapped and studied in some detail to identify the attributes of those most closely associated with gold ore and to constrain genetic models. Four types of jasperoids, J0, J1, J2, and J3, were distinguished on the basis of their geologic and structural settings and appearance. Field relations suggest that J0 formed during an early event. Petrographic observations, geochemistry, and ??18O values of quartz suggest it was overprinted by the hydrothermal event that produced ore-related J1, J2, and J3 jasperoids and associated gold deposits. The greater amount of siliciclastic detritus present in J0 jasperoids caused them to have higher ??18O values than J1,2,3 jasperoids hosted in underlying limestones. Ore-related jasperoids are composed of main-ore-stage replacements and late-ore-stage open-space filling quartz with variable geochemistry and an enormous range of ??18O values (24.5 and -3.7???). Jasperoids hosted in limestones with the most anomalous Au, Ag, Hg, ??(As, Sb, Tl) concentrations and the highest ??18O values are associated with the largest deposits. The 28??? range of jasperoid ??18O values is best explained by mixing between an 18O-enriched fluid and an 18O-depleted fluid. The positive correlation between the sizes of gold deposits and the ??18O composition of jasperoids indicates that gold was introduced by the 18O-enriched fluid. The lowest calculated ??18O value for water in equilibrium with late-ore-stage quartz at 200??C (-15???) and the measured ??D value of fluid inclusion water extracted from late-ore-stage orpiment and realgar (-116???) indicate that the 18O-depleted fluid was composed of relatively unexchanged meteoric water. The source of the 18O-enriched ore fluid is not constrained. The ??34S values of late-ore-stage realgar, orpiment, and stibnite (5.7-15.5???) and barite (31.5-40.9???) suggest that H2S and sulfate were derived from sedimentary sources. Likewise, the ??13C and ??18O values of late-stage calcite (-4.8 to 1.5??? and 11.5 to 17.4???, respectively) suggest that CO2 was derived from marine limestones. Based on these data and the apparent absence of any Eocene intrusions in the district, Gold Bar may be the product of a nonmagmatic hydrothermal system. ?? Springer-Verlag 2006.

Explore related subjects

Mineralium DepositaArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O. Yigit, A. H. Hofstra, M.W. Hitzman, E.P. Nelson. 2006-08-08. Geology and geochemistry of jasperoids from the Gold Bar district, Nevada. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-006-0080-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

The use of fluorite geochemistry and machine learning to identify critical mineral systems

Fluorite (CaF 2 ) is a potential pathfinder to critical mineral and rare earth element (REE) deposits but its application has been limited to a narrow range of mineralization types. I show that fluorite is a robust recorder of mineralization fertility by applying statistical and machine-learning methods to a new global fluorite geochemical database. Distinct median rare earth and trace element patterns are observed among deposit types and genetic environments. Fluorite associated with carbonatites and REE deposits are relatively enriched in Sr and have minimal Eu anomalies. These characteristics define new bivariate discrimination diagrams that correctly identify 78% of carbonatite-related fluorite and 88% of fluorite from REE deposits. Random forest classifiers were developed for a wide range of mineralization types and genetic settings. Trained solely on rare earth element patterns, these models achieve accuracies of 77–79%. Higher classification accuracies (up to 88–96%) are obtained when including elements such as Sr, highlighting the significance of trace elements for optimal fluorite classification. The recognition of diagnostic fluorite compositional fingerprints, particularly in REE-fertile systems, underscores its potential as a pathfinder and indicator for critical mineral exploration in F-bearing environments.

Mineralium Deposita↗
USGS2026

Insights into Mountain Pass carbonatite formation from in-situ sulfur isotopes and geochemistry of sulfate and sulfide minerals

The Mountain Pass carbonatite stock hosts a world-class rare earth element deposit and may be classified as a carbonate-sulfate igneous rock, as it contains on average > 50 volume percent carbonate minerals and 20 to 30 volume percent sulfate minerals. The sulfates range in composition from barite to celestine and locally occur with sparse sulfide minerals. We investigate the origin of sulfur enrichment and the occurrence of sulfur-bearing minerals in the Mountain Pass carbonatite with in-situ sulfur isotope and mineral chemistry. Barite cores with δ 34 S of 1 to 3‰ do not coexist with sulfides, whereas celestine rims with δ 34 S of > 3‰ are associated with sulfides with δ 34 S < -10‰. We propose a model in which sulfur-bearing sediments were subducted during episodes of plate convergence in the Mojave Province that preceded Mountain Pass magmatism. Metasomatism of the overlying mantle by melts derived from the subducted sediments generated an unusually carbon- and sulfur-rich source to yield carbonatite magmas. Sulfur from primary carbonatite magmas and ~ 1 to 7% sulfur from subducted sediment melts yielded a slightly enriched δ 34 S composition (relative to depleted mantle δ 34 S of -1‰) for early crystallizing barite. Celestine rims on magmatic barite cores formed at low, hydrothermal temperatures (< 350 °C) based on S isotope thermometry for equilibrium celestine-galena and celestine-pyrite pairs. The sparse sulfides in the carbonatite stock are not in equilibrium with the primary barite cores and therefore do not permit S isotope thermometry estimates of magmatic temperatures. The S/Se ratios of sulfide minerals (> 3,400) typically exceed primitive mantle values (S/Se of 3,340), also consistent with their derivation from hydrothermal fluids. Trace occurrences of sulfide and sulfate minerals in alkaline silicate stocks related to the carbonatite stock have similar δ 34 S compositions and yield similarly low formation temperatures, suggesting regionally extensive and chemically similar sulfur-bearing hydrothermal fluids that imparted lithologically diverse rocks with a consistent sulfur isotope fingerprint.

California, Nevada↗
USGS2026

Microtextural characteristics of adularia in banded quartz veins from the Midas low-sulfidation epithermal deposit, Nevada

High-grade ores at the Miocene Midas low-sulfidation epithermal deposit in northern Nevada are confined to crustiform quartz veins containing abundant adularia. Micro-X-ray fluorescence elemental mapping reveals that adularia is a common gangue mineral occurring in colloform bands, bands showing bladed textures, and bands with dendritic terminations. The adularia aggregates have delicate shapes and are comprised of stacked, submillimeter crystals hosted by fine-grained quartz. The textural evidence suggests that the adularia aggregates originally formed within a gel-like, noncrystalline silica matrix, which subsequently transformed into quartz. This indicates that the adularia did not precipitate in open space along the vein walls. Correlative microscopy, involving scanning electron microscopy-based automated mineralogy and optical petrography, demonstrates that bands containing abundant adularia are not the primary host to ore minerals. The ore minerals occur in different bands within the crustiform veins, implying that adularia and ore mineral precipitation did not always occur simultaneously. It is hypothesized here that fluid flow at Midas involved intermittent short-lived events of fluid flashing, causing rapid solute supersaturation in the liquid. During each flashing event, different amounts of vapor were produced along a given vein. Compositional differences between adjacent bands in the crustiform quartz veins may, therefore, be linked to variations in the amount of vapor formed during each flash event.

Nevada↗