Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70024364

The use of U.S. Geological Survey CD-ROM-based petroleum assessments in undergraduate geology laboratories

Abstract

Domestic oil production is declining and United States reliance on imported oil is increasing. America will be faced with difficult decisions that address the strategic, economic, and political consequences of its energy resources shortage. The geologically literate undergraduate student needs to be aware of current and future United States energy issues. The U.S. Geological Survey periodically provides energy assessment data via digitally-formatted CD-ROM publications. These publications are free to the public, and are well suited for use in undergraduate geology curricula. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1995 National Assessment of United States Oil and Gas Resources (Digital Data Series or DDS-30) (Gautier and others, 1996) is an excellent resource for introducing students to the strategies of hydrocarbon exploration and for developing skills in problem-solving and evaluating real data. This paper introduces the reader to DDS-30, summarizes the essential terminology and methodology of hydrocarbon assessment, and offers examples of exercises or questions that might be used in the introductory classroom. The USGS contact point for obtaining DDS-30 and other digital assessment volumes is also provided. Completing the sample exercises in this report requires a copy of DDS-30.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R. L. Eves, L. E. Davis, T. S. Dyman, K. I. Takahashi. 2018-01-31. The use of U.S. Geological Survey CD-ROM-based petroleum assessments in undergraduate geology laboratories. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-50.3.312

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Impact of a place-based role-playing exercise on student sense of classroom community and science identity in a hydrology class

Fostering a sense of classroom community in earth science classes supports students’ sense of belonging within the classroom and the broader scientific community, helping them build a sense of identity as a geoscientist. This study examines the effects of incorporating a 2-week, collaborative role-playing activity on sense of classroom community and science identity in an introductory hydrology class. Students assumed roles of residents, medical center representatives, government employees, and environmental activists to learn about flooding through a community-centered lens, focusing on a flood event in Harris County, Texas during Tropical Storm Allison. Pre-post-surveys were given immediately before and after the learning module to evaluate classroom community, science identity using Likert scales, and hydrologist identity using a pictorial scale. Qualitative analysis of a short-answer question in which students defined “hydrologist” provided context for quantitative identity data. Post-survey data on classroom community shows an increase in mean agreement as compared to the pre-survey. This increase was statistically significant for four classroom community statements. Paired science identity data show small effect size and no significant change, but pictorial identity as a hydrologist shows significant growth. Social aspects of the role-playing activity did not significantly alter student’s already high science identity but altered their conceptions of the social implications of hydrology and increased identity as hydrologists. The significant increase in classroom community has important implications for using role-playing as an active learning strategy to enhance student learning experience by creating a positive classroom climate and connecting hydrology concepts to community needs.

Journal of Geoscience Education↗

K-12 trade books’ representation of earthquake safety and protective actions: A content analysis

Meaningful learning resources for earthquake safety and survival have become an increasingly important topic among geoscientists, especially educators and researchers. Various members of the public, especially K-12 (ages 5–18) learners, continue to depend on scientific trade books available at their local public and school libraries for information about earthquake concepts. To our knowledge, no research has empirically examined how trade books represent earthquake safety and survival actions. In this research, we combine an iterative qualitative inductive and deductive analysis to explore the representation of earthquake safety and protective actions in 50 trade books. We categorize these actions into time-based practices related to preparedness before an earthquake, protective actions during an earthquake, and recovery after an earthquake. These trade books emphasize preparedness by means of building earthquake-resistant structures and urban planning, and efforts toward community resilience and keeping home supplies. The recommended personal protective action during an earthquake in the United States (“Drop, Cover, and Hold On”) is emphasized in the majority of the trade books, as well as other protective actions related to emotional actions and current technological automated actions such as earthquake early warning systems. Finally, the books highlight actions such as damage evaluation and support as ways to recover after an earthquake. Our findings highlight the issues between accepted earthquake safety and survival actions and the limited and/or inaccurate knowledge represented in some trade books. We provide interpretations of how presentation of limited or inaccurate information may increase confusion about appropriate protective actions. The inclusion of accepted and recommended protective actions in future trade books and the use of earthquake drills in public libraries as a supplement for trade book users may improve understanding and implementation of appropriate actions. We further demonstrate the potential of trade book contents in fostering earthquake education through library-community partnerships.

Journal of Geoscience Education↗