Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70024063

Mexican native trouts: A review of their history and current systematic and conservation status

Abstract

While biologists have been aware of the existence of native Mexican trouts for over a century, they have received little study. The few early studies that did much more than mention their existence began in the 1930s and continued into the early 1960s, focusing primarily on distributional surveys and taxonomic analyses. Starting in the 1980s the Baja California rainbow trout became the subject of more detailed studies, but very little remains known of mainland trouts of the Sierra Madre Occidental. We review earlier studies and report on our own collections and observations made between 1975 and 2000. We present newly discovered historical evidence that leads us to conclude that a "lost" cutthroat trout, a lineage not previously known from Mexico, was collected more than a century ago from headwaters of the Ri??o Conchos (a major tributary of the Rio Grande (= Ri??o Bravo)), a basin not previously considered to harbor a native trout. We review the last century of regional natural resource management and discuss our own observations of trout habitats. Impacts of logging, road building and overgrazing are widespread and expanding. Many streams suffer from heavy erosion, siltation and contamination, and though long-term hydrologic data are generally not available, there is evidence of decreased discharge in many streams. These problems appear related to region-wide land management practices as well as recent regional drought. Trout culture operations using exotic rainbow trout have rapidly proliferated throughout the region, threatening genetic introgression and/or competition with native forms and predation on them. Knowledge of distribution, abundance, relationships and taxonomy, not to mention ecology and population biology, of native trouts of the Sierra Madre Occidental remains inadequate. Vast areas of most mainland drainages are still unexplored by fish collectors, and even rudimentary information regarding basic biology, ecology and population structure of stocks remains lacking. Concentrated exploration, research and management of this long overlooked and undervalued resource are all urgently needed. The history of natural resources exploitation that placed so many native trouts of the western United States on threatened and endangered species lists is repeating itself in the Sierra Madre Occidental. Without concentrated action and development of region-wide socio-economic solutions for current, largely non-sustainable resource management practices, native Mexican trout gene pools will soon be in grave danger of extinction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D.A. Hendrickson, H.E. Perez, L.T. Findley, W. Forbes, J.R. Tomelleri, Richard L. Mayden, J.L. Nielsen, B. Jensen, G.R. Campos, A.V. Romero, A. van der Heiden, F. Camarena, F.J. Garcia de Leon. 2002. Mexican native trouts: A review of their history and current systematic and conservation status. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1025062415188

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Navigating uncertainty and competing objectives: Spring chinook salmon recovery in the upper Willamette river

Globally, anadromous fish populations are threatened with extinction due to multiple factors, including river impoundments that block migration, widespread alteration of physical habitat, temperature, and flow regimes, commercial and recreational harvest, changes in biological communities, and long-term climate trends. In this synthesis, we describe how physical and biological factors, policy and law, and public resource allocation affect management of spring-run Chinook Salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in the Upper Willamette River (UWR), Oregon, USA. Efforts to restore salmon populations often involve trade-offs, for example, water management decisions must account for flood control, agricultural and municipal water use, and management of other species. UWR Chinook Salmon recovery efforts are also governed by multiple laws, policies, and action agencies that in some cases have incongruent objectives. Competing and conflicting objectives, combined with uncertainty regarding the outcomes of proposed management actions, create significant challenges for decision makers. Resource limitations, regulatory constraints, and incongruent objectives have created challenges for managers in the UWR, but opportunities exist for improved adaptive management and collaboration, which could build trust and engagement among stakeholders and ultimately support the successful implementation of decision tools. A suite of decision support tools that have been used in the Willamette River basin and elsewhere across the range of Pacific salmon have the potential to enhance decision processes. These tools can be effective when decision makers and stakeholders commit to long-term, collaborative utilization of the tools for decision making, and when available resources and regulatory environments are conducive to implementation and adaptive refinement of both the decision-support tools and management plans. The general biological and institutional principles discussed for UWR Chinook Salmon in this work apply more generally to populations of anadromous fishes across their range, especially to populations in highly regulated river systems.

Oregon↗

Small fish, big implications: Considerations for an ecosystem approach to capelin fisheries management

Climate-driven changes in the Subarctic will directly impact capelin populations and the ecosystem they inhabit, including their predators, prey, and physical habitats. Consequently, incorporating ecosystem considerations in future capelin fisheries management is crucial. In this study, a multidisciplinary group of experts critically evaluated whether the current capelin stock assessment and management frameworks for the four main capelin stocks in the Barents Sea (BS), Iceland-East Greenland-Jan Mayen (IEGJM), Newfoundland and Labrador shelf (NL) and Alaska (AK) align with the principles of an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM). An evidence-based ranking of our knowledge on current capelin dynamics across ecological, economic, and social dimensions was conducted, using expert knowledge supported by literature. This exercise also identified data currently used for assessment and management, which highlighted that the existing capelin assessment frameworks include varying degrees of EAFM elements across stocks, such as considerations of trophic interactions, bottom-up processes, accounting for ecosystem uncertainty, and stakeholder engagement in the advisory process. Nonetheless, there is room for improvement where data and knowledge are lacking. We provide some key tactical (short-term) and strategic (long-term) recommendations from our perspective on what is required to ensure the sustainable management of capelin in the circumpolar region over the coming decades.

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries↗

The functional traits behind fish rarity in an impounded river basin

Reservoirs alter flows and aquatic habitats, reordering rarity patterns of reservoir ichthyofauna by allowing certain fish traits to flourish while filtering others. We reviewed the composition of fish species in an impounded river basin (Tennessee River, USA) to identify traits that influence rarity. We delineate levels of rarity based on the number of occupied reservoirs and species distribution, compare traits across rarity levels, and pinpoint traits that influence species rarity inside reservoirs. Four rarity levels were designated to 212 fish species: absent from the reservoir, rare and restricted within the basin, rare and spread throughout the basin, and common throughout the basin. Common species had the most distinctive traits, suggesting highly filtered species. They exhibited higher fecundity, longevity, piscivory, potamodromy, and association with large woody debris, vegetation, slow current, and lacustrine habitats. Rare and spread and rare and restricted species were separated by a few macrohabitat traits, with the former tending to be more lowland, slow current, large river, and lacustrine-oriented whereas the latter more creek and lotic oriented. Only age at maturity, longevity, fecundity, and potamodromy—all of which were lower in absent species—separated the absent from the rare and restricted. About half of rare and restricted species were already rare and restricted pre-impoundment; the rest had wider distributions pre-impoundment denoting species vulnerable in reservoirs and needing conservation to prevent local extinctions. Signals gleaned from species traits and rarity analysis indicate that conservation of rare species may need to focus on enhancements to selected reservoir habitats and to basin-wide connectivity.

Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee↗