Recommended nomenclature for zeolite minerals: Report of the Subcommittee on Zeolites of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names

D.S. Coombs; A. Alberti; T. Armbruster; G. Artioli; C. Colella; E. Galli; Joel D. Grice; F. Liebau; J.A. Mandarino; H. Minato; E.H. Nickel; E. Passaglia; D.R. Peacor; S. Quartieri; R. Rinaldi; M. Ross; R.A. Sheppard; E. Tillmanns; G. Vezzalini

USGS · 70020286

Recommended nomenclature for zeolite minerals: Report of the Subcommittee on Zeolites of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names

D.S. Coombs·A. Alberti·T. Armbruster·G. Artioli·C. Colella·E. Galli·Joel D. Grice·F. Liebau·J.A. Mandarino·H. Minato·E.H. Nickel·E. Passaglia·D.R. Peacor·S. Quartieri·R. Rinaldi·M. Ross·R.A. Sheppard·E. Tillmanns·G. Vezzalini

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This report embodies recommendations on zeolite nomenclature approved by the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. In a working definition of a zeolite mineral used for this review, structures containing an interrupted containing an interrupted framework of tetrahedra are accepted where other zeolitic properties prevail, and complete substitution by elements other than Si and Al is alloowed. Separate species are recognized in topologically distinctive compositional series in which different extra-framework cations are the most abundant in atomic proportions. To name these, the appropriate chemical symbol is attached by a hyphen to the series name as a suffix, except for the names harmotome, pollucite and wairakite in the phillipsite and analcime series. Differences in space-group symmetry and in order-disorder relationships in zeolites having the same topologically distinctive framework do not in general provide adequate grounds for recognition of separate species. Zeolite species are not to be distinguished solely in Si:Al ratio except for heulandite (Si:Al < 4.0) and clinoptilolite (Si:Al ??? 4.0). Dehydration, partial hydration and over-hydration are not sufficient grounds for the recognition of separate species of zeolites. Use of the term 'ideal formula' should be avoided in referring to a simplified or averaged formula of zeolite. Newly recognized species in compositional series are as follows: brewsterite-Sr, -Ba; chabazite-Ca, -Na, -K; clinoptilolite-K, -Na, -Ca; dechiardite-Ca, -Na; erionite-Na, -K, -Ca,; faujasite-Na, -Ca, -Mg; ferrierite-Mg, -K, -Na; gmelinite-Na, -Ca, -K; heulandite-Ca, -Na, -K, -Sr; levyne-Ca, -Na; paulingite-K, -Ca; phillipsite-Na, -Ca, -K stilbite-Ca, -Na. Key references, type locality, origin of name, chemical data, IZA structure-type symbols, space-group symmetry, unit-cell dimensions, and comments on structure are listed for 13 compositional series, 82 accepted zeolite mineral species, and three of doubtful status. Herschelite, leonhardite, svetlozarite and wellsite are discredited as mineral species names. Obsolete and discredited names are listed.

Explore related subjects

European Journal of Mineralogy Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D.S. Coombs, A. Alberti, T. Armbruster, G. Artioli, C. Colella, E. Galli, Joel D. Grice, F. Liebau, J.A. Mandarino, H. Minato, E.H. Nickel, E. Passaglia, D.R. Peacor, S. Quartieri, R. Rinaldi, M. Ross, R.A. Sheppard, E. Tillmanns, G. Vezzalini. 1998. Recommended nomenclature for zeolite minerals: Report of the Subcommittee on Zeolites of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70020286

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2021

Zirconium-bearing accessory minerals in UK Paleogene granites: Textural, compositional, and paragenetic relationships

The mineral occurrences, parageneses, textures, and compositions of Zr-bearing accessory minerals in a suite of UK Paleogene granites from Scotland and Northern Ireland are described. Baddeleyite, zirconolite, and zircon, in that sequence, formed in hornblende + biotite granites (type 1) and hedenbergite–fayalite granites (type 2). The peralkaline microgranite (type 3) of Ailsa Craig contains zircon, dalyite, a eudialyte-group mineral, a fibrous phase which is possibly lemoynite, and Zr-bearing aegirine. Hydrothermal zircon is also present in all three granite types and documents the transition from a silicate-melt environment to an incompatible element-rich aqueous-dominated fluid. No textures indicative of inherited zircon were observed. The minerals crystallized in stages from magmatic through late-magmatic to hydrothermal. The zirconolite and eudialyte-group mineral are notably Y + REE-rich (REE signifies rare earth element). The crystallization sequence of the minerals may have been related to the activities of Si and Ca, to melt peralkalinity, and to local disequilibrium.

European Journal of Mineralogy↗

USGS2017

Element partitioning in magnetite under low-grade metamorphic conditions – A case study from the Proterozoic Belt Supergroup, USA

The distribution and partitioning of elements in igneous rocks is well established for various melt –(fluid) –solid pairs and provides important insights into the petrogenesis of these rocks. Studies of the partitioning behavior of elements under metamorphic conditions are scarce and commonly focus on high-grade metamorphic facies. Little is known about the partitioning behavior of elements under low-grade metamorphic conditions. Greenschist-facies metasedimentary rocks of the North American Belt Supergroup host magnetite that displays equilibrium features with co-existing mineral phases such as quartz and carbonate. Magnetite is an ideal target for geochemical investigations because it can incorporate a large number of cations and is sensitive to changes in temperature, oxygen fugacity, pressure, whole-rock composition, and cooling trends. Whole-rock major and trace element analyses have been undertaken on representative samples from Belt Supergroup metasedimentary rocks using X-ray luorescence. Electron microprobe and laser ablation ICP-MS were used to obtain major and trace element concentrations for magnetite hosted in these rocks. Stable-isotope geothermometry of magnetite–quartz and magnetite–carbonate pairs constrain metamorphic temperatures to ca. 390°C. Partition coefficients (D) for magnetite–matrix pairs presumably reflect equilibrium at these low-grade metamorphic conditions. Except for Mn and Ni, which show comparable partition coefficients, the calculated values are one to two orders of magnitude lower than those for igneous magnetite. Aluminum displays the lowest calculated partition coefficient with a value of 0.006 and Ni and Fe the highest values with 6.3 and 20.9, respectively. Of the elements that commonly occur in spinel-group minerals, two groups can be distinguished: (1) elements that preferentially partition into the host rock (D<1): Al, Mg, Pb, and Ti and (2) elements that show a preference to partition into magnetite (D>1): Zn, Mn, Cr, V, Ni, and Fe.

European Journal of Mineralogy↗

USGS2006

Thermodynamic properties and crystal structure refinement of ferricopiapite, coquimbite, rhomboclase, and Fe2(SO4)3(H2O)5

Enthalpies of formation of ferricopiapite [nominally Fe4.67(SO4)6(OH)2 (H2O)20]. coquimbite [Fe2(SO4)3(H2O)9], rhomboclase [(H3O)Fe(SO4)2 (H2O)3], and Fe2(SO4)3(H2O)5 were measured by acid (5 N HCl) solution calorimetry. The samples were characterized by wet chemical analyses and synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). The refinement of XRD patterns gave lattice parameters, atomic positions, thermal factors, and occupancies of the sites. The calculated formulae differ slightly from the nominal compositions: Fe4.78(SO4)6 (OH)2.34(H2O)20.71 (ferricopiapite), (Fe1.47Al0.53)(SO4)3 (H2O)9.65 (coquimbite), (H3O)1.34Fe(SO4)2.17 (H2O)3.06 (rhomboclase), and Fe2(SO4)3 (H2O)5.03. All thermodynamic data are given per mole of these formulae. The measured standard enthalpies (in kJ/mol) of formation from the elements (crystalline Fe, Al, S, and ideal gases O2 and H2) at T = 298.15 K are -4115.8??4.1 [Fe2(SO4)3 (H2O)5.03], -12045.1??9.2 (ferricopiapite), -5738.4??3.3 (coquimbite), and -3201.1??2.6 (rhomboclase). Standard entropy (S??) was estimated as a sum of entropies of oxide, hydroxide, and sulfate components. The estimated S?? (in J/mol.K) values for the iron sulfates are 488.2 [Fe2(SO4)3 (H2O)5.03], 1449.2 (ferricopiapite), 638.3 (coquimbite), and 380.1 (rhomboclase). The calculated Gibbs free energies of formation (in kJ/mol) are -3499.7??4.2 [Fe2(SO4)3 (H2O)5.03], -10089.8??9.3 (ferricopiapite), -4845.6??3.3 (coquimbite), and -2688.0??2.7 (rhomboclase). These results combined with other available thermodynamic data allow construction of mineral stability diagrams in the FeIII2(SO4)3-FeII SO4-H2O system. One such diagram is provided, indicating that the order of stability of ferric sulfate minerals with decreasing pH in the range of 1.5 to -0.5 is: hydronium jarosite, ferricopiapite, and rhomboclase. ?? 2006 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

European Journal of Mineralogy↗