Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 5220450

Marsh and aquatic weed problems in wildlife habitat

Abstract

To most people, the word weeds signifies pest plants of the farm, roadside, or other upland areas. However, weeds also occur on, under, or near water. Fifteen million dollars have been spent on a single aquatic nuisance in the South—the prolific water-hyacinth which clogs navigable streams and lakes with its growth. Hundreds of thousands of dollars have also been expended on control of the waterchestnut or water caltrop in the Potomac River. In addition, smaller-scale local campaigns are continuing against cattails, reeds, giant cutgrass, maidencane, alligatorweed, needlerush, lotus, rose-mallows, willows, alders, buttonbush, and similar weeds that interfere with land use for recreation, irrigation, or other purposes. Since control of marsh and aquatic plants in wildlife habitat is an unfamiliar activity to most weed workers, broad aspects of its what, why , and how will be explained briefly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A. C. Martin. 1954. Marsh and aquatic weed problems in wildlife habitat. https://doi.org/10.2307/4040041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Diuron, fenuron, monuron, neburon, and TCA mixtures as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats

The substituted urea herbicides were rated according to their effectiveness as aquatic herbicides in this order: diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], monuron [3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], neburon [1-butyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methlyurea] and TCA(trichloroacetic acid) mixtures with them. They showed greatest potential in controlling certain aquatic plants in pre-emergence and early postemergence applications. However, relatively high concentrations were required to control filamentous algae ( Cladophora , Pithophora and Spirogyra ) , chara ( Chara ) , coontail ( Ceratophyllum ) , naiad ( Najas ) , and pondweeds ( Potamogeton ) for periods of time exceeding three months and up to three years. Granular formulations achieved better distribution of herbicides for control of rooted aquatic plants along the margins of lakes and ponds. Wettable powder and liquid emulsifiable concentrates were superior to granular formulations for the control of algae and emergent or floating aquatic plants. Monuron and fenuron were less toxic to fish than were diuron and neburon. The TCA mixtures were somewhat more toxic than the simple ureas. Some species of fish were more sensitive than others and fingerlings more sensitive than adults of the same species. Fish-food organisms were reduced appreciably in plastic enclosures at herbicidal concentrations.

Weeds

Control of alligatorweed in South Carolina with granular silvex

Silvex, [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid], impregnated (20% ae) on clay granules, applied at a rate as low as 20 lb/A ae gave excellent control of well-rooted alligatorweed [ Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Grieb] growing in less than 18 inches of water. The 2-ethylhexyl ester of silvex was more effective than the potassium salt. Silvex was not effective on floating-mat alligatorweed or in water over 18 inches deep.

South Carolina

Simazine and other s-triazine compounds as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats

This investigation studied simazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)- s -triazine), atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino- s -triazine), propazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)- s -triazine), and prometone (2-methoxy-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)- s -triazine). Preemergence applications of granular formulations of simazine on attaclay or calcium sulfate of simazine at 1 to 2 ppmw controlled Potamogeton , Najas , Ceratophyllum , Heteranthera and Zannichelli a. Higher rates were required to control filamentous algae ( Cladophora and Pithophora ) and chara ( Chara vulgaris ). Early postemergence applications of wettable powder to submersed aquatics and filamentous algae were often effective. Atrazine gave similar results. Concentrations of 0.5 to 1.0 were effective in controlling Cladophora and Pithophora and three species of Potamogeton in pond applications. Spray applications, generally, were more effective than broadcasting granular atrazine. Propazine and prometone did not control submersed species in concentrations up to 3 ppmw. Simazine had a relatively high margin of safety with respect to acute toxicity to fish. It was less toxic than propazine, prometone or atrazine. Granular forms were less toxic than wettable powder or emulsifiable concentrates. Laboratory tests on bottom organisms gave an acute LD 50 toxic dosage of 28 ppmw. Field observations did not demonstrate a serious reduction in the production of bottom organisms. However, the control of aquatic vegetation brought about ecological changes affecting bottom dwelling and weed clinging organisms. These changes would affect certain fishes with special food habits.

Weeds