Geology topics

Research about Rochester, Minnesota

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Rochester, Minnesota.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2001

Ground-water recharge and flowpaths near the edge of the Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood confining unit, Rochester, Minnesota

The primary source of ground water for the city of Rochester, Olmsted County, southeastern Minnesota is the St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer. Based on results of a previous U.S. Geological Survey investigation in the Rochester area, relatively high rates of areal recharge to the St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer occur along the edge of the overlying Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood confining unit. The primary source of water to the zone of increased recharge along the edge of the confining unit is the upper carbonate aquifer. Ground-water recharge rates to the St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer during all of 1998 ranged from 1.9 to 25.5 in./yr (inches per year). Recharge rates were greatest near the edge of the Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood confining unit and least where the confining unit is thick and is overlain by the upper carbonate aquifer (mean of 2.0 in./yr). Recharge rates downslope from the edge of the confining unit were greatest to the St. Peter on the slope entering the main South Fork Zumbro River Valley. Results of groundwater age dating using chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) indicated recharge dates ranging from (1) the mid-1950’s to the early 1990’s for the St. Peter, (2) the late 1960’s to approximately 1990 for the Prairie du Chien, and (3) the early to mid-1950’s for the Jordan. Cross-sectional model simulations indicated that most of the areal recharge entering the aquifer system through the upper carbonate aquifer discharges from springs and seeps. Of the 2.28 ft3/s (cubic feet per second) of areal recharge that enters the upper carbonate aquifer, 2.23 ft3/s is discharged from the aquifer by springs and seeps. Results indicate that areal recharge to the upper Prairie du Chien moves primarily westward and discharges to Bear Creek. Areal recharge rates derived from hydrograph analysis, CFC age-dating, and cross-sectional model analysis were much greater to the St. Peter downslope from the edge of the Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood confining unit (25.5, 35.3, and 23.75 in./yr, respectively) than occurs to the Prairie du Chien in any hydrogeologic setting. The model-simulated discharge from springs and seeps in the lower part of the upper carbonate aquifer represents a potential source of water of 33 in./yr to the St. Peter unit, similar to the estimated areal recharge rates derived from hydrograph analysis and CFC age-dating. The water withdrawn by pumped wells or discharged to Bear Creek is derived predominantly from areal recharge near the edge of the Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood confining unit (0.47 ft 3 /s), rather than from water that has leaked downward through the Decorah unit (0.03 ft 3 /s). Model simulated discharge through springs and seeps in the lower part of the upper carbonate aquifer (0.21 ft 3 /s) represents a potential source of water to the St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer.

Minnesota↗

USGS1993

Delineation of recharge areas for selected wells in the St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer, Rochester, Minnesota

Accurate delineation of recharge areas for wells is an important requisite to protecting ground-water quality. Zones of transport and zones of contribution are two types of recharge areas that can be delineated. Analytical-calculation, numerical-modeling, and hydrogeologic-mapping methods were used to delineate recharge areas for two high-capacity wells (greater than about 200 gallons per minute discharge) completed in a karstic aquifer in the city of Rochester, in southeastern Minnesota. One well is less than 1,000 feet from a river in an area where the aquifer is unconfined, whereas the other well is more than 2,000 feet from a stream in an area where a bedrock confining unit is present. Ground-water travel times from points along the top of the aquifer to a pumped well are identified by use of a constructed map showing lines of equal advective travel time. A zone of transport, therefore, is defined by the area bounded by lines of equal travel time. Zones of transport are delineated by analytical models (calculations) and by numerical models that account for hydrologic factors. Analytical models that were used include fixed-radius (Theis drawdown, Theis time-of-travel, and volumetric equation) and variable shape. Numerical modeling was done with the U.S. Geological Survey three-dimensional ground-water-flow model MODFLOW and particle-tracking code MODPATH. The zone-of-transport areas for each of the two wells calculated by the various analytical models were very similar. The Theis-drawdown method yielded results that compared least favorably with results from the other analytical methods. The zone-of-transport areas computed by use of the numerical model were generally larger than areas computed by use of analytical models. Hydrogeologic mapping and numerical modeling were used to delineate zones of contribution to wells, defined as all parts of a ground-water-flow system that could supply water to a well. The zones of contribution delineated by use of numerical modeling have similar orientation (parallel to regional flow directions) but significantly different areas than the zones of contribution delineated by use of hydrogeologic mapping. Differences in computed areas of recharge are attributed to the capability of the numerical model to more accurately represent (1) the three-dimensional flow system, (2) hydrologic boundaries such as streams, (3) variable recharge, and (4) the influence of nearby pumped wells, compared to the analytical models.

Minnesota↗

USGS1979

Flood of July 5-7, 1978, on the South Fork Zumbro River at Rochester, Minnesota

The intense thunderstorm of July 5-6, 1978, caused record flooding on the South Fork Zumbro River at Rochester, Minnesota. The peak discharge on July 6 was 30,500 cubic feet per second compared with 19,600 cubic feet per second for the flood of March 1965, which was the largest previously known. The 1965 flood had a recurrence interval of about 30 years, whereas the 1978 flood had a recurrence interval exceeding 100 years. The flood waters claimed at least 5 lives and 5,000 people were forced to leave their homes. Millions of dollars in flood damage was reported, and this report summarizes some of the flood data and a photomosaic map shows the inundated area.

Minnesota↗