Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Research about Live Oak County, Texas

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Live Oak County, Texas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Relations among hydrocarbon reservoirs, epigenetic sulfidization, and rock magnetization; Examples from the South Texas coastal plain

This paper focuses on the association between concentrations of iron disulfide (FeS 2 ) minerals in the shallow subsurface and underlying hydrocarbon accumulations. Such FeS 2 concentrations are the result of migration of either H 2 S or organic constituents from the underlying hydrocarbons. The H 2 S from reservoirs is produced inorganically from sulfate in the reservoir rocks at high temperature (>90 degrees C) and migrates to shallower beds to react inorganically with iron to form FeS 2 . Organic constituents from reservoirs, in contrast, provide nourishment for sulfate reducing bacteria in shallow relatively cool (<90 degrees C) beds. Sandstone in the Ray Point uranium district in Live Oak County, Texas contains abundant FeS 2 which formed both from deep-seated H 2 S and from H 2 S produced in the shallow subsurface by bacteria that utilized organic materials from depth. Deep petroleum reservoirs were physically connected to near-surface (<100 m) beds containing epigenetic FeS 2 by the Oakville fault. Epigenetic iron sulfide formation occurred in at least four episodes over at least five million years. Evidence from the Ray Point district and elsewhere in Texas illustrates that sulfidization reactions have destroyed magnetic iron-titanium oxide minerals in the vicinity of major growth faults, resulting in a systematic decrease in magnetic susceptibility and magnitude of remanent magnetization in the vicinity of such faults. Growth faults which tap hydrocarbon deposits may be detectable using aeromagnetic methods.

Texas

Uranium-lead isochron age and preliminary sulfur isotope systematics of the Felder uranium deposit, south Texas

Uranium-lead isotope systematics of roll-front ores in Miocene sandstone at the Felder and McLean uranium deposits (south Texas coastal plain) give a well-defined 207 Pb/ 204 Pb- 235 U/ 204 Pb isochron age of 5.07 + or - 0.15 m.y. The relatively slight degree of scatter of the points defining the isochron is probably due to initial Pb isotope inhomogeneity, and the resulting inferred persistence of closed system behavior for U and Pb is probably the result of the long-term presence of U- and Pb-immobilizing H 2 S. 206 Pb/ 238 U systematics are badly scattered owing to long-term migration of radioactive daughters of 238 U. Beta- and gamma-activity systematics of the ores consistently identify those with grossly anomalous Pb isotope systematics, however, and proved highly useful in identifying ores that have gained gross amounts of uranium daughters.FeS 2 minerals in the altered tongue of the host sandstone are characterized by abundant postore pyrite and heavy delta 34 S values, whereas FeS 2 minerals in mineralized and unaltered, barren rock are characterized by abundant ore-stage marcasite and by light delta 34 S values. The delta 34 S values of FeS 2 minerals in the altered tongue are similar to those defined for sour gas from the underlying Edwards Limestone of Cretaceous age, indicating the probable source for the sulfur of an inferred resulfidization event. The 5.07-m.y. isochron age probably reflects the end of roll-front development; we believe that the end was due to the resulfidization and does not preclude significant earlier periods of mineralization. Modern ground water in the area is also sulfide bearing (thus helping preserve the deposit), but with delta 34 S values distinct from those of sulfides in the resulfidized zone of the host rock.

Texas