Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Research about Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The stratigraphic record of the mid-Piacenzian warm period on the Atlantic Coastal Plain

Anthropogenic climate change is an existential threat to our planet, impacting everything from the delicate balance of ecosystems to the availability of vital resources. Coastal regions, particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to rising sea levels and changing weather patterns, are experiencing increased erosion, flooding, and habitat loss. Understanding how coastal regions responded to past warming is crucial for developing effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. One past interval commonly used to examine and compare with climate model projections of near future conditions is the mid-Piacenzian Warm Period (MPWP) which occurred between*3.3 and 3.0 Ma. Here we review the stratigraphy of Atlantic Coastal Plain (ACP) sediments to determine the stratigraphic position of the MPWP by evaluating ages based upon existing and new planktic foraminifer occurrence data calibrated to the current geologic time scale (GTS2020). We identify geologic formations representing pre-, syn-, and post-MPWP environments. The Sunken Meadow Member of the Yorktown Formation in Virginia and North Carolina and the Wabasso beds in the subsurface of Georgia and Florida both fall within Planktic Foraminiferal Zone PL1 and represent pre-MPWP Pliocene deposits. Parts of the Yorktown Formation in southeastern Virginia and northern North Carolina, the Duplin Formation in North Carolina and South Carolina, and the Raysor Formation in South Carolina and Georgia, fall within Planktic Foraminiferal Zone PL3 and were deposited following a major regression associated with a global drop in sea level during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) M2 and represent syn-MPWP deposits. Representing the immediately post-MPWP climate conditions (Planktic Foraminiferal Zone PL5) are the Chowan River, Bear Bluff, and Cypresshead Formations. This work provides a record of the MPWP from Georgia to Virginia and provides a stratigraphic framework within which the impacts of a profound global warming on the east coast of the United States can be assessed.

Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia

U-Pb zircon ages and Pb isotope geochemistry of gold deposits in the Carolina slate belt of South Carolina

Volcanic rocks of the Persimmon Fork Formation host the largest known gold mines of the Carolina slate belt. U-Pb (SHRIMP) zircon ages have been obtained from rocks closely associated with pyrite-enargite-gold deposits at Brewer (quartz-topaz rhyolite breccia from the argillic alteration zone in the Brewer pit and felsic ash-flow tuff from the quartz sericite alteration zone), from the disseminated and semimassive pyrite-gold deposits at Haile (crystal lithic rhyolitic ash-flow tuffs from the Champion pit), and from the Ridgeway deposit (felsic ash-flow tuff from the stratigraphic host of the North pit gold deposit). Generally, the zircons are fine grained, fractured, and contain crystal imperfections (corrosion, inclusions, and pits). 206 Pb/ 238 U zircon spot ages for all deposits span a wide range, mostly from 400 to 760 Ma. Inclusions and cores indicative of inherited domains in the zircons were not found, and only a few analyses range from 1.1 to 1.8 Ga. A distinct xenocrystic zircon population was not identified. The 206 Pb/ 238 U weighted age averages of zircon indicate the following crystallization dates for the volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks closely associated with the gold deposits: 550 &plusmn; 3 Ma for Brewer, 553 &plusmn; 2 Ma for Haile, and 556 &plusmn; 2 Ma for the Ridgeway deposit. These zircon crystallization ages represent close estimates of the age of the original gold mineralizing events. Younger zircon spot ages can be attributed to the effects of Paleozoic regional metamorphism. Pb isotope compositions of sulfide minerals (galena, pyrite, enargite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and molybdenite) and silicate minerals (K-feldspar, and sericite) in the gold deposits help to constrain the sources of fluids and metals during the mineralizing events. The deposits are pyrite rich, containing multiple generations of pyrite, including early-crystallized pyrite that is closely associated with the original gold mineralizing event, as well as recrystallized pyrite formed in response to Paleozoic metamorphism. Pb isotope compositions of pyrite span a wide range, including the most radiogenic values for the sulfides. Galena and K-feldspar are not abundant but where present they are typically the least radiogenic minerals. Galena has a limited range of Pb isotope compositions that are representative of the gold deposits as a group ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb = 18.020&ndash;18.326, 207 Pb/ 204 Pb = 15.550&ndash;15.639, 208 Pb/ 204 Pb = 37.605&ndash;38.286). Values of 207 Pb/ 204 Pb straddle the average crustal Pb growth curve, consistent with contributions involving the mantle and continental crust. Whole-rock Pb isotope compositions of volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks of the Persimmon Fork Formation nearly match the range for sulfides in the gold deposits. Subtle regional contrasts in Pb isotope compositions exist among the deposits. Sulfide minerals from Barite Hill (e.g., galena 206 Pb/ 204 Pb < 18.077) in southern South Carolina are generally less radiogenic than sulfides from Ridgeway ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb > 18.169), Haile ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb > 18.233), and Brewer ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb > 18.311) in northern South Carolina. Because Pb isotope compositions of basement rocks from Grenville massifs in the southern Appalachians and sulfide minerals from the gold deposits do not match, a direct genetic connection cannot be established. Diversity in values of 206 Pb/ 204 Pb and the relatively high values of 207 Pb/ 204 Pb suggest that the deposits evolved adjacent to or closely related to continental blocks, perhaps linked to a back-arc tectonic setting. Among potential younger analogues of the slate belt gold deposits are the sulfide deposits of the Okinawa trough in the western Pacific. Mantle-derived isotopic contributions were more important at Barite Hill in southern South Carolina, the least radiogenic among the deposits where oceanic crust had developed, than at Brewer, Haile, and Ridgeway in northern South Carolina where rifting thinned the continental crust.

Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia

Carolina slate belt gold deposits in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia

The Southeastern United States, in particular, the Carolina slate belt of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, has been an important region of mineral production (fig. 1). This region is thought to have major potential for containing large undiscovered deposits of gold and silver, as well as copper, lead, zinc, molybdenum, and tin. Gold production from the major mines (Haile, Brewer, Ridgeway, and Barite Hill) in South Carolina ranked sixth in the Nation in 1992. Despite the closing of all but one mine in 1997, the region continues to attract intense scrutiny by the mining industry. Current U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) efforts in the slate belt are led by a multidisciplinary team focused on an integrated, multistate, and multiyear project that has the potential to result in a fundamental reinterpretation of the economic geology of the region. The slate belt is considered a scientific frontier because of the rapid pace of data acquisition by the USGS, academia, and private sector geologists and because emerging concepts of its geologic evolution are controversial. Establishing the origin of the gold deposits is important, not only in guiding exploration, but for more accurate assessment of the potential for the occurrence of new deposits throughout the southern Appalachians. These efforts may result in further industry exploration that may lead to discovery of new economically viable mineral deposits, which would have a broad economic impact on the region. Another goal is to find ways to prevent human activities related to gold extraction from remobilizing toxic metals found in these deposits, which could have potential harmful effects on the environment.

Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia