Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Research about Colorado River, Glen Canyon Dam, Grand Canyon

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Colorado River, Glen Canyon Dam, Grand Canyon.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Growth of a threatened desert fish becomes resource dependent when released from temperature limitation in a regulated river

1. Growth of ectotherms typically positively correlates with increasing temperature towards an optimal temperature range, followed by a decline in growth when temperatures exceed the optimal temperature range for that organism. When temperature is within or close to the optimal range, food availability and other environmental factors can play important roles in modifying growth rates. River regulation often alters both environmental conditions (e.g., flow, turbidity and temperature) and aquatic food webs, modifying the quality and quantity of resources available to consumers. Here we aim to understand how food availability, water temperature and other environmental factors are associated with fish growth (defined here as a change in length) in a large, regulated desert river. 2. We measured growth of humpback chub (Gila cypha) at two river reaches located 240 km apart in the Colorado River within the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. We then fit Bayesian state-space models of growth that account for variable time at large to test environmental predictors such as water temperature, flow, turbidity (which increases during tributary flooding and can be a proxy for allochthonous inputs) and gross primary productivity (a proxy for autochthonous food) using an inclusion parameter approach. Both river reaches are located below Glen Canyon Dam, which regulates flow, alters seasonal water temperatures and traps sediment, nutrients, and organic carbon; however, merging tributaries and a greater distance from the dam lead to differences in environmental conditions. 3. In the upriver reach, where warm season water temperatures are below the optimal range for humpback chub most of the time, temperature was the primary driver of variation in growth according to inclusion parameter values and the strength of the standardised effect size. Turbidity was also included in the final model for the upper reach, but the inclusion parameter values and standardised effect size were smaller than for temperature. In the downriver, warmer reach, temperature still had the highest inclusion parameter value, but GPP had the highest standardised effect and nearly as high an inclusion parameter value. 4. We conclude that temperature is the primary limiting factor on growth of humpback chub in the Grand Canyon; however, as water temperatures increase, other factors, especially GPP, are associated with temporal variation in growth rates. Over the past two decades, declines in reservoir elevations and the volume of summer releases have increased downstream water temperatures. If warm temperatures persist into the future, other factors may have increasing roles in regulating interannual variability in chub growth. 5. Field studies of ectotherm growth often emphasise the role of water temperature; however, the role of resource availability is also increasingly recognised, especially in bioenergetics studies. Quantifying resource availability directly can be difficult, especially in large, remote rivers. Here, we show here that using proxies for resource availability (i.e., GPP as a proxy for autochthonous inputs) can yield useful insights regarding resource limitations with implications for management of federally listed fish species in a larger regulated river system.

Arizona↗

Four-band image mosaic of the Colorado River Corridor downstream of Glen Canyon Dam in Arizona, derived from the May 2021 airborne image acquisition

In May 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey’s Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center acquired airborne multispectral high-resolution data for the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. The image data, which consist of four spectral bands (red, band 1; green, band 2; blue, band 3; and near infrared, band 4) with a ground resolution of 20 centimeters, are available as 16-bit unsigned-integer GeoTIFF files in Sankey and others (2024) (available online at https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BBGN6G ). The image files are projected in the State Plane Coordinate System, using the central Arizona zone (202) with the North American Datum of 1983 National Adjustment of 2011. The assessed spatial accuracy for these data is based on 47 ground-control points that were independent from the ground-control points used by the contractor for aerotriangulation and is reported at the 95-percent confidence level as 0.514 meter (m) and a root mean square error of 0.297 m. The intended uses of this dataset are primarily in support of scientific research and monitoring applications. Examples of these applications include high-resolution spatial and temporal change detection of the river channel, geomorphic landforms, riparian vegetation, and backwater and nearshore habitat, as well as other ecosystem-wide mapping. These imagery data also serve as reference material for field science mission planning, as base data for field data collection including community science activities, and as a highly detailed guide for technical boat operation during science activities such as reconnaissance for nighttime missions and navigating rapids during low flows.

Arizona, Nevada, Utah↗

Sandbar deposition caused by high-flow experiments on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam: November 2012 – November 2018

The streamflow regime and sand supply of the Colorado River have been affected by the presence and operations of Glen Canyon Dam since filling of Lake Powell began in March 1963. Consequent changes in river morphology have included decreases in the size and abundance of sandbars used as campsites in Grand Canyon National Park (Dolan and others, 1974; Schmidt and Graf, 1990; Kearsley and others, 1994). The sandbars that occur along the banks of the Colorado River and create camping beaches and backwaters and are habitat used by native fish (Dodrill and others, 2015) are inherently unstable features of an active river channel (Schmidt, 1990). The deposits form when sand, carried in suspension in the main channel of the Colorado River, settles in the lower velocity recirculating currents of eddies (Rubin and others, 1990; Schmidt, 1990). When the flows that resulted in bar deposition recede, leaving a fresh sand deposit, the deposits begin eroding. Decreases in the magnitude and frequency of annual floods have resulted in decreased opportunities for deposition. The complete elimination of sand sources upstream from Glen Canyon Dam decrease the supply that is available when high flows do occur. Finally, the increase in the magnitude of flows throughout the year coupled with daily fluctuations for hydropower generation accelerate rates of erosion for remaining sandbars (Hazel and others, 2010).

Arizona↗

Nearshore temperature findings for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona: Possible implications for native fish

Since the completion of Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona, in 1963, downstream water temperatures in the main channel of the Colorado River in Glen, Marble, and Grand Canyons are much colder in summer. This has negatively affected humpback chub ( Gila cypha ) and other native fish adapted to seasonally warm water, reducing main-channel spawning activity and impeding the growth and development of larval and juvenile fish. Recently published studies by U.S. Geological Survey scientists found that under certain conditions some isolated nearshore environments in Grand Canyon allow water to become separated from the main-channel current and to warm, providing refuge areas for the development of larval and juvenile fish.

Arizona↗

Testing laser-based sensors for continuous in situ monitoring of suspended sediment in the Colorado River, Arizona

High-resolution monitoring of sand mass balance in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona, USA, is needed for environmental management. In the Grand Canyon, frequent collection of suspended-sediment samples from cableways is logistically complicated, costly and provides limited spatial and temporal resolution. In situ laser sensors were tested in the Colorado River as an alternative method for monitoring the river's suspended transport. LISST data were collected at a fixed-depth, near-shore site while isokinetic measurements were simultaneously made from a nearby cableway. Diurnal variations in LISST grain size and concentration data compared well with depth-integrated, cross-section data. Tbe LISST was also successfully used to electronically trigger an ISCO 6712 pump sampler to provide continuous monitoring during periods when suspended concentrations exceeded the LISST's measurement range. Initial results indicate that the LISST can provide useful high-resolution suspended-sediment data within the Colorado River, when optics are maintained on a weekly basis.

Arizona↗