EXPLORE THE ARCHIVE

Research about China

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including China.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Production of mineral commodities and geospatial map of the mineral industries and related infrastructure of China

As part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) mission to distribute global mineral information and analyze supply chains, this study provides a comprehensive review of the global significance of China’s mineral production and capacity in 2023. Of 77 mineral commodities in the USGS dataset, China produced 74 and was the world’s first-ranked producer for 39 of the 74. Compared to the high share of global mineral production, including up to 98 percent of global gallium production, the country’s share of global mineral reserves was relatively small, ranging from 20 percent (zinc ore) to 52 percent (tungsten ore). China’s imports of metal ores, slag, and ash accounted for 64 percent of global imports of such commodities by value. The country’s exports of base metals and articles of base metal accounted for 17 percent of the global exports. To help nongeographic information system users assess the spatial distribution of mineral mines, processing facilities, and ports for trades in China, this study created a geospatial (also called “georeferenced”) portable document format (GeoPDF) map. In addition, the GeoPDF contains mineral resource tracts (such as antimony, copper, potash, coal, and oil and gas), exploration sites, and energy infrastructure based on the preexisting USGS data.

Open-File Report↗

USGS2026

Dynamic drainage reorganization in Eastern Tibet: Insights from the Yangtze River first bend

The modern drainage network of eastern Tibet is widely believed to have developed through a series of river capture and flow reversal events; however, the timing and mechanisms driving this reorganization remain contentious. Among these events, the river capture that formed the First Bend of the Yangtze River (YFB) stands out as both iconic and particularly debated. Here we present sedimentary provenance data from the Late Miocene–Quaternary Dali Basin, located south of the YFB, which indicate that a southward-flowing Jinsha River (i.e., the present-day upper Yangtze River) sourced sediment to the Dali basin at ∼7.4–6.4 Ma in a drainage configuration different from that of today. Because this interval postdates the initial establishment of a near-modern Jinsha River system prior to the Miocene, our results imply at least two discrete fluvial reorganizations occurred at the YFB—one preceding ∼7.4 Ma and another following ∼6.4 Ma. By integrating these findings with landscape evolution modeling, we infer that the initiation of rapid uplift of the Yulong-Haba Mountains and the Diancang Shan may have been responsible for these drainage reorganizations. These results underscore that Cenozoic drainage systems on the eastern Tibetan Plateau have evolved dynamically on a short timescale of ∼10 5 –10 6 -year, rather than remaining in a long-term stationary configuration on ∼10 7 -year timescales.

eastern Tibetan Plateau, first bend of the Yangtze↗

USGS2025

Sand provenance boundary in the Mu Us Sandy Land of northern China

Desert dunes are often assumed to have uniform mineral compositions due to extensive mixing during lateral transport, which complicates provenance studies. The Mu Us Sandy Land in north-central China, near the East Asian summer monsoon precipitation boundary, experiences a wetter climate than most deserts. Climate wetting as a result of a warming climate, and the ‘Sand Control Project’ implemented by the Chinese government to decrease the lateral movement of sand dunes in this area provide an opportunity to study surface processes of sand production and transport. Previous studies using zircon U Pb geochronology and heavy mineral composition indicate distinct sand sources for the Mu Us Sandy Land: local basement-derived middle Yellow River sediments and recycled dried-up lacustrine sediments for the eastern part, and northeastern Tibetan Plateau-derived upper Yellow River sediments for the western part. However, zircons and heavy minerals only represent trace amounts of the bulk mineralogy within a sand dune, so broader provenance analysis targeting common minerals is essential. We focus on the area near the proposed provenance difference boundary between the western and eastern Mu Us Sandy Land, using comprehensive sampling and provenance techniques to confirm distinct provenance characteristics and delineate the provenance boundary. Our findings reveal that sand from most of the Mu Us Sandy Land originated from the erosion of local basement by the middle Yellow River and recycled local dried-up lacustrine sediments, whereas the southwestern corner and the neighboring western-central Chinese Loess Plateau received sediments from the distal northeastern Tibetan Plateau.

Mu Us Sandy Land↗