Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Research about Carolina Trough

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Carolina Trough.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Structure of the lower crust beneath the Carolina Trough, U.S. Atlantic continental margin

Data from three large-offset seismic profiles provide information on the crustal structure beneath the Carolina trough. The profiles, obtained by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Naval Oceanographic Research Development Agency, and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in 1985, were oriented parallel to the trough and were located (1) seaward of the East Coast Magnetic Anomaly (ECMA), which is generally thought to represent the boundary between oceanic and continental crust; (2) along the axis of the trough between the ECMA and the hinge zone, which is thought to reflect the landward limit of highly stretched and altered transitional crust; and (3) along the Carolina platform landward of the basement hinge zone on crust thought to have been thinned only slightly during rifting. These data constrain the velocity structure of the lower crust and provide evidence for a thick lens of high-velocity (>7.1 km/s) lower crustal material that extends beneath the Carolina trough and the adjacent ocean basin. This lens reaches a maximum thickness of about 13 km beneath the deepest part of the trough, thins to about 5 km seaward of the ECMA, and is either very thin or absent landward of the hinge zone. It is interpreted to represent material that was underplated beneath and/or intruded into the crust during the late stage of continental rifting and that led to an anomalously thick plutonic layer during the early seafloor spreading phase. These data thus support the recent conclusions of White et al. (1987b) and Mutter et al. (1988) that the initiation of seafloor spreading is attended in many, if not most, cases by the generation of an anomalously large volume of melt.

Carolina Trough

Carolina Trough structure contour maps

Four strong reflection horizons identified on multichannel seismic-reflection profiles of the U.S. continental margin east of the Carolinas have been traced and contoured (maps A-D). Depths, in kilometers, to the horizons were calculated by the method of Taner and Koehler (1969) using the reflection-time and RMS (root-mean-square) velocities from multichannel velocity analyses. The contoured horizons are continuous traceable reflections on the profiles, indicating that they are surfaces of geological significance. A paleoshelf edge and slope exists on all profiles seaward of the present-day slope. Reflectors cannot be traced from the old shelf into the deep sea, and age estimates for the two areas are derived independently. As a result, the horizons contoured on each map cannot by shown to be synchronous, but they are interpreted to be approximately similar in age. The ages assigned to these horizons under the shelf were determined by projecting reflecting horizons to onshore wells (Brown and others, 1972) and, through a network of seismic profiles, to offshore wells north and south of the map area where units have been dated (Dillon and others, 1979a, b; Schlee, 1981; Paull and Dillon, 1980a) Ages of relectors seaward of the paleoshelf edge were determined by tracing the deep-sea reflecting horizons to DSDP (Deep Sea Drilling Project) wells (Klitgord and Grow, 1980; Tucholke and Mountain, 1979; Paull and Dillon, 1980b).

Miscellaneous Field Studies Map