Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Research about California, Nevada, Utah

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including California, Nevada, Utah.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2025

Critical mineral inventory of select IOA-IOCG deposits, southwestern USA

Critical minerals are necessary for modern technology and strategic purposes. Their increasing importance requires finding new and nontraditional resources. Samples of ore, altered, and unaltered host rock were collected from 26 iron mines and prospects in California, Nevada, and Utah to assess the potential of these deposits to host economic quantities of different critical minerals. Geochemical analyses were conducted by 61 element ICP-OES-MS sodium peroxide fusion and major elements determined by WDXRF. These deposits concentrated many critical minerals beyond what is found in average upper crustal abundances, such as Sb, As, Bi, Co, Ga, Mg, Mn, Ni, Nb, Pd, REE, Sc, Te, Sn, Ti, W, V, and Zn. However, most of these are not concentrated enough in the ore to be considered as economic resources. Those critical minerals that are enriched enough in some of these deposits to possibly be considered as by-product commodities are Ni, REE, V, and potentially Co and Ga. These enrichments were not uniform, with REE more likely to be enriched in IOA deposits, whereas Co, Ga, Ni, and V could be found enriched in either IOA or IOCG deposits.

California, Nevada, Utah↗
USGS2005

Tephra layers of Blind Spring Valley and related upper Pliocene and Pleistocene tephra layers, California, Nevada, and Utah: Isotopic ages, correlation, and magnetostratigraphy

Numerical ages have been determined for a stratigraphic sequence of silicic tephra layers exposed at the Cowan Pumice Mine in Blind Spring Valley, near Benton Hot Springs, east-central California, as well as at Chalk Cliffs, north of Bishop, Calif. The tephra layers at these sites were deposited after eruptions from nearby sources, most of them from near Glass Mountain, and some from unknown sources. The ages were determined primarily by the laser-fusion 40 Ar/ 39 Ar method, mostly on sanidine feldspar; two were determined by conventional K-Ar analysis on obsidian clasts.

California, Nevada, Utah↗
USGS2003

Geologic database for digital geology of California, Nevada, and Utah— An application of the North American Data Model

The USGS is creating an integrated national database for digital state geologic maps that includes stratigraphic, age, and lithologic information. The majority of the conterminous 48 states have digital geologic base maps available, often at scales of 1:500,000. This product is a prototype, and is intended to demonstrate the types of derivative maps that will be possible with the national integrated database. This database permits the creation of a number of types of maps via simple or sophisticated queries, maps that may be useful in a number of areas, including mineral-resource assessment, environmental assessment, and regional tectonic evolution. This database is distributed with three main parts: a Microsoft Access 2000 database containing geologic map attribute data, an Arc/Info (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California) Export format file containing points representing designation of stratigraphic regions for the Geologic Map of Utah, and an ArcView 3.2 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California) project containing scripts and dialogs for performing a series of generalization and mineral resource queries. IMPORTANT NOTE: Spatial data for the respective stage geologic maps is not distributed with this report. The digital state geologic maps for the states involved in this report are separate products, and two of them are produced by individual state agencies, which may be legally and/or financially responsible for this data. However, the spatial datasets for maps discussed in this report are available to the public. Questions regarding the distribution, sale, and use of individual state geologic maps should be sent to the respective state agency. We do provide suggestions for obtaining and formatting the spatial data to make it compatible with data in this report. See section ‘Obtaining and Formatting Spatial Data’ in the PDF version of the report.

California, Nevada, Utah↗