Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Tim King

Publications and source records attributed to Tim King.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2018

The Pleurobemini (Bivalvia: Unionida) revisited: Molecular species delineation using a mitochondrial DNA gene reveals multiple conspecifics and undescribed species

The Pleurobemini (Bivalvia: Unionida) represent approximately one-third of freshwater mussel diversity in North America. Species identification within this group is challenging due to morphological convergence and phenotypic plasticity. Accurate species identification, including characterisation of currently unrecognised taxa, is required to develop effective conservation strategies because many species in the group are imperiled. We examined 575 cox1 sequences from 110 currently recognised species (including 13 Fusconaia and 21 Pleurobema species) to understand phylogenetic relationships among pleurobemine species (mainly Fusconaia and Pleurobema ) and to delineate species boundaries. The results of phylogenetic analyses showed no geographic structure within widespread species and illustrated a close relationship between Elliptio lanceolata and Parvaspina collina . Constraint tests supported monophyly of the genera Fusconaia and Pleurobema , including the subgenus P . ( Sintoxia ). Furthermore, results revealed multiple conspecifics, including P. hanleyianum and P. troschelianum , P. chattanoogaense and P. decisum , P. clava and P. oviforme , P. rubrum and P. sintoxia , F. askewi and F. lananensis , and F. cerina and F. flava . Species delimitation analyses identified three currently unrecognised taxa (two in Fusconaia and one in Pleurobema ). Further investigation using additional genetic markers and other lines of evidence (e.g. morphology, life history, ecology) are necessary before any taxonomic changes are formalised.

Invertebrate Systematics↗
USGS2017

The Southern Appalachian Brook Trout management conundrum: What should restoration look like in the 21st Century?

Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis in the southern Appalachian portion of their range have been isolated in remote headwater systems for millennia. Recent genetic investigations indicate extremely low allelic diversity, heterozygosity and effective population sizes in many streams. In populations restored using multiple source stocks, limited introgression has been observed despite source stocks being collected from streams within the same subwatershed. It remains unclear if pre- and/or post-reproductive isolating mechanisms are restricting effective gene flow among source stocks in restored streams. Objectives of this study were to: 1) identify environmental variables contributing to assortative mating, and 2) use common garden crossings to determine if wild type brood stock crossings resulted in physiologically viable offspring. We observed markedly different fertilization success rates within-population (66.7%) and betweenpopulation (91.7%) from the 42 crosses (N=18 control, N=24 treatment). Moreover, we observed significant (P < 0.05) differences between within-population and between-population groups in each of our linear mixed effects global models for each trial stage of development (i.e., fertilization rate, eyed egg rate, and hatch rates). Tukey’s HSD comparisons revealed only one significantly (P < 0.003) different fertilization rate among the forty five pairwise comparisons in each of our three stages of trails. In addition, we observed differential peaks of gamete production within and among source stream brood stock, despite common garden conditions, that appeared to have limited fertilization success rates between interstream and control groups. Despite differential peak gamete timing, intrastream crosses performed equally, and, in some instances, better than those between control groups. Our results suggest differential responses to shared environmental conditions (i.e., temperature and/or photoperiod) may contribute to mismatched spawning phenology (i.e., gamete production timing) among restoration founder stocks leading to introgression (i.e., genetic admixture). The application of contemporary genetic techniques could help determine if these possible local adaptations are genetically fixed or may break down over time in restored populations with mixed source stocks. These findings demonstrate the need to apply contemporary conservation genetics tools to future wild trout restoration projects using translocated source stock towards the goal of “genetically-robust”, naturally reproducing populations with the ability to cope with current and future perturbations.

North Carolina, Tennessee↗
USGS2006

Conservation genetics in the USGS

Conservation genetics is the application of the tools and concepts of genetics to the conservation of biological resources. Once too sophisticated and expensive for routine use, the tools of conservation genetics are now widely used to address many complex management questions. These novel methods of analysis can augment assessments made with traditional methods and can bring new information to light. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is well suited to provide scientific information and expertise using these tools to support the management of biological resources.

Fact Sheet↗