Geology topics

Steven A. Kannenberg

Publications and source records attributed to Steven A. Kannenberg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Bioclimatic reorganization of carbon–water–energy coupling revealed by eddy covariance and interpretable machine learning

Ecosystem exchanges of carbon, water, and energy are central to Earth system functioning, yet their sensitivities to environmental variability remain poorly constrained across biomes and climates. Here, we analyzed ≥5 years of eddy covariance data from 87 AmeriFlux sites (964 site-years) spanning six vegetation types and a broad range of climatic conditions to examine the controls and multi-year trends of gross primary productivity (GPP), evapotranspiration (ET), water-use efficiency (WUE), and the Bowen ratio. We trained boosted regression tree ensembles with environmental (air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, soil water content, atmospheric CO₂, radiation, wind speed) and temporal (month, year) variables, and used interpretable machine learning—SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Accumulated Local Effects (ALE)—to quantify driver importance and nonlinear responses. Across biomes and along climatic gradients, environmental controls reorganized predictably: radiation dominated under warm and humid conditions, whereas soil moisture exerted stronger influence in drier or warmer systems. GPP and ET were shaped by similar dominant drivers, with radiation and temperature generally strongest but soil moisture exerting comparable influence in some biomes. WUE was consistently constrained by vapor pressure deficit, reflecting stomatal regulation under rising atmospheric dryness. In contrast, controls on the Bowen ratio diverged more across biomes, reflecting heterogeneity in how ecosystems partition energy between latent and sensible heat. Multi-year trend analysis revealed negative associations of GPP and ET with rising atmospheric demand, and positive associations of the Bowen ratio with drying, indicating reduced evaporative cooling and stronger land–atmosphere coupling. Together, these findings show that while carbon and water fluxes remain tightly coupled across timescales, their balances reorganize predictably along bioclimatic gradients. This framework underscores the value of long-term flux networks and interpretable machine learning for benchmarking Earth system models and constraining projections of terrestrial carbon–water–energy dynamics under climate change.

Global Change Biology Communications↗

USGS2025

Network of networks: Time series clustering of AmeriFlux sites

Environmental observation networks, such as AmeriFlux, are foundational for monitoring ecosystem response to climate change, management practices, and natural disturbances; however, their effectiveness depends on their representativeness for the regions or continents. We proposed an empirical, time series approach to quantify the similarity of ecosystem fluxes across AmeriFlux sites. We extracted the diel and seasonal characteristics (i.e., amplitudes, phases) from carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy, and momentum fluxes, which reflect the effects of climate, plant phenology, and ecophysiology on the observations, and explored the potential aggregations of AmeriFlux sites through hierarchical clustering. While net radiation and temperature showed latitudinal clustering as expected, flux variables revealed a more uneven clustering with many small (number of sites < 5), unique groups and a few large (> 100) to intermediate (15–70) groups, highlighting the significant ecological regulations of ecosystem fluxes. Many identified unique groups were from under-sampled ecoregions and biome types of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), with distinct flux dynamics compared to the rest of the network. At the finer spatial scale, local topography, disturbance, management, edaphic, and hydrological regimes further enlarge the difference in flux dynamics within the groups. Nonetheless, our clustering approach is a data-driven method to interpret the AmeriFlux network, informing future cross-site syntheses, upscaling, and model-data benchmarking research. Finally, we highlighted the unique and underrepresented sites in the AmeriFlux network, which were found mainly in Hawaii and Latin America, mountains, and at under-sampled IGBP types (e.g., urban, open water), motivating the incorporation of new/unregistered sites from these groups.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology↗

USGS2024

Challenges and future directions in quantifying terrestrial evapotranspiration

Terrestrial evapotranspiration is the second-largest component of the land water cycle, linking the water, energy, and carbon cycles and influencing the productivity and health of ecosystems. The dynamics of ET across a spectrum of spatiotemporal scales and their controls remain an active focus of research across different science disciplines. Here, we provide an overview of the current state of ET science across in situ measurements, partitioning of ET, and remote sensing, and discuss how different approaches complement one another based on their advantages and shortcomings. We aim to facilitate collaboration among a cross-disciplinary group of ET scientists to overcome the challenges identified in this paper and ultimately advance our integrated understanding of ET.

Water Resources Research↗