Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Shubham Datta

Publications and source records attributed to Shubham Datta.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mate replacement and alloparental care in Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis)

Alloparental care (i.e., care for unrelated offspring) has been documented in various avian species (Maxson 1978, Smith et al. 1996, Tella et al. 1997, Lislevand et al. 2001, Literak and Mraz 2011). A male replacement mate that encounters existing broods has options, which include alloparental care or infanticide. Infanticide may be beneficial in some species (Rohwer 1986, Kermott et al. 1990), but in long-lived avian species, like the ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) that do not renest within a season, infanticide might be detrimental. Adoption and rearing success likely provide direct evidence of competence of replacement mates as potential parents for future seasons, a benefit that might outweigh the investment of time and effort associated with adoption and rearing (after Rohwer 1986). Anticipated mating opportunity at the cost of adoption (Gori et al. 1996, Rohwer et al. 1999) may explain step-parental benevolence and therefore, in such a scenario would enhance individual fitness through subsequent recruitment of related young.

The Prairie Naturalist

Habitat selection by female swift foxes (Vulpes velox) during the pup-rearing season

The swift fox (Vulpes velox) was historically distributed in western South Dakota including the region surrounding Badlands National Park (BNP). The species declined during the mid-1800s, largely due to habitat loss and poisoning targeted at wolves (Canis lupis) and coyotes (C. latrans). Only a small population of swift foxes near Ardmore, South Dakota persisted. In 2003, an introduction program was initiated at BNP with swift foxes translocated from Colorado and Wyoming. We report on habitat use by female swift foxes during the pup-rearing season (May&ndash;July) in 2009. Analyses of location data from 13 radiomarked female foxes indicated disproportional use ( P < 0.001) of some habitats relative to their availability within swift fox home ranges. Swift foxes used grassland ( &#374 = 1.01), sparse vegetation ( &#374 = 1.43) and prairie dog towns ( &#374 = 1.18) in proportion to their availability, whereas they were less likely to use woodland ( &#374 = 0.00), shrubland ( &#374 = 0.14), pasture/agricultural-land ( &#374 = 0.25) and development ( &#374 = 0.16) relative to availability. Swift foxes typically are located in habitats that provide greater visibility, such as shortgrass prairie and areas with sparse vegetation; which allow detection of approaching coyotes (e.g., primary predator of swift foxes).

South Dakota