Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Richard Hereford

Publications and source records attributed to Richard Hereford.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
USGS1996

Late Holocene alluvial geomorphology of the Virgin River in the Zion National Park area, southwest Utah

This study traces the geomorphic development of the alluvial valley of the Virgin River in the Zion National Park region of southwest Utah. The purpose is to identify, date, and interpret the patterns of erosion and deposition that formed the alluvial valley over the past 1,000 years. This information is a basis for understanding how the geomorphology of the alluvial valley changes under essentially natural flow conditions. Sediment in the alluvial valley is classified as mainstem or tributary in origin. Mainstem alluvium is the largest volumetrically; it is mainly light-colored sand derived from upstream sources that accumulated on now abandoned flood plains (or terraces) by overbank deposition. Tributary sediment is typically dark colored, coarse-grained sand or gravel transported to the alluvial valley by streamflow or debris flow. Tributary and mainstem sediment are interbedded near the margin of the valley, and the older deposits are truncated parallel to the river, suggesting that in time the river removes both its own deposits and those of tributaries. In the natural flow regimen, the river probably maintains a balance between erosion and deposition of mainstem and tributary deposits. Four terraces and the active channel and flood plain are widespread along the Virgin River; from oldest to youngest these are the prehistoric, settlement, historic, and modern terraces. Dating was done by archeologic context, tree-ring methods, historic documents, relocation of early photographs, and correlation with other streams on the southern Colorado Plateau. Results indicate that prehistoric deposition ended by about A.D. 1100–1200, deposition of the settlement alluvium was from about A.D. 1400–1880, development of the historic terrace was from after 1883 until 1926, deposition of the modern alluvium was from 1940–1980, and development of the active channel and flood plain was after about 1980. The principal deposits (prehistoric, settlement, and modern alluviums) are separated by two periods of stream entrenchment and channel widening referred to as the prehistoric and historic arroyo cutting, respectively. Erosional activity of roughly similar age occurred in most southern Colorado Plateau streams. The early erosion is not well dated in the study area, although regional relations suggest A.D. 1200–1400, if not somewhat earlier. Historic arroyo cutting began after 1883 in the study area and continued until around 1940 when deposition of the modern alluvium began. Both erosions affected the human population of the region. Although the dating is imprecise, the Anasazi probably abandoned the region during prehistoric arroyo cutting, partly because of adverse environmental conditions. Likewise, historic arroyo cutting caused major losses of property and economic hardship among Anglo settlers. Erosion and deposition were largely contemporaneous with variations in streamflow. Long-term streamflow of the Virgin River was estimated from calibration of annual tree growth with measured streamflow. Results indicate that erosion was during periods of unusually high streamflow and that deposition was during periods of relatively low streamflow. These relations are best illustrated by historic arroyo cutting and subsequent deposition of the modern alluvium. Precipitation and runoff immediately before and during historic arroyo cutting were the most unusual of the past 300 years; they varied from the driest immediately preceding erosion to the wettest during erosion. Deposition of the modern alluvium was during relatively low runoff after 1940. High runoff destabilizes the channel, enhancing flood erosion. Conversely, relatively low runoff increases channel stability, reducing the erosional effect of floods and enhancing flood plain deposition. Adjustments in the width and depth of the channel are frequent, even after relatively small, short-term variations of streamflow.

Utah↗
USGS1993

Entrenchment and widening of the upper San Pedro River, Arizona

The San Pedro River of southeast Arizona is a north-flowing tributary of the Gila River. The area of the drainage basin upstream of the 40-km-long study reach is about 3,200 km 2 . This study traces the historical evolution of the San Pedro River channel—specifically, the deepening, widening, and sediment deposition that have occurred since 1900—and it aims to evaluate the causes of channel widening and deepening, the rate of widening, and the present stability of the channel. Alluvium of the river valley consists of upper Holocene pre- and postentrenchment deposits. The pre-entrenchment alluvium, which forms the principal terrace of the inner valley, accumulated between about A.D. 1450 and 1900 in a relatively sluggish, low-energy fluvial system with extensive marshy reaches and high water table. In contrast, postentrenchment alluvium, which forms the terrace, floodplain, and channel of the San Pedro River, was deposited in a relatively high-energy, entrenched, and meandering fluvial system. The river flowed in a shallow, narrow channel on the surface of the unentrenched valley before 1890. A series of large floods, perhaps beginning as early as 1881, eventually led to entrenchment of the channel between 1890 and 1908. This deepening placed the channel 1 to 10 m below the former floodplain. The channel has widened substantially since entrenchment through lateral migration and expansion of entrenched meanders; its present size is 5.7 times greater than before entrenchment. The rate of channel expansion, however, has decreased since about 1955, coincident with a decrease of peak-flood discharge. Channel area increased at 0.1 km 2 yr −1 from entrenchment until 1955; since then the area increased at only 0.02 km 2 yr −1 , suggesting that the channel has stabilized and that further widening will probably be minor under present conditions of land use, discharge, and climate. The reduction of peak-flow rates was related partly to increased channel sinuosity and to development of floodplains and riparian woodlands. The increased sinuosity produced a reservoir effect that attenuated flood waves, and the development of flood-plains enabled flood waters to spread laterally, thereby increasing transmission losses. In addition, flow rates were probably affected by improved land use and changes of rainfall intensity and short-term rainfall patterns, which reduced runoff and decreased the time necessary for channel stabilization. Livestock grazing decreased steadily after the turn of the century, and numerous stock ponds and small water-retention structures were constructed in tributaries. The cumulative effect of these structures probably reduced peak-flow rates. Short-term rainfall patterns of the wet season (June 15–October 15) have probably changed from annual alternation of above- and below-average rainfall to a biennial or longer pattern. Moreover, frequency of low-intensity rainfall (daily rainfall less than about 1.27 cm) was consistently above average for the decade 1957–1967. These factors probably improved conditions for growth and establishment of vegetation both in and outside of the channel. The causes of the large floods that resulted in entrenchment are poorly understood, although climate and land use were key factors. Floods followed closely the rapid settlement of the area brought about by mining activity in the late 1870s; population rose from a few hundred to 6,000 in less than 5 yr. Extensive wood cutting for mine timber and fuel, suppression of wildfire, and reintroduction of large cattle herds undoubtedly exacerbated entrenchment. Flood-producing wet-season rainfall in the Southwest, however, was unusually heavy before, during, and shortly after entrenchment.

Arizona↗
USGS1993

Surficial geology, geomorphology, and erosion of archeologic sites along the Colorado River, eastern Grand Canyon, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona

The average number of archeologic sites along the Colorado River in eastern Grand Canyon between River Miles 65-72 exceeds 12 km -1 ; the largest concentration from Glen Canyon Dam to the mouth of Grand Canyon. The sites are mostly of Anasazi affiliation, dating from the Pueblo Ito Pueblo II periods (A.D. 800-1200), although older sites of Basketmaker II affinity (about 200 B.C. to A.D. 400) and younger sites of Native American and Anglo affiliation are also present. All of the sites are closely associated with late-Holocene alluvial, debris-flow, and eolian deposits that accumulated in the river corridor during the past 2,500 years. The majority of sites occur on or beneath the surface of ancient alluvial deposits of the Colorado River, which form distinctive high terraces. Lateral shifts of the river extensively eroded these deposits and associated archeologic sites twice in prehistoric times, between A.D.300700 and between A.D. 1200-1400. In late historic times, numerous sites have been damaged or destroyed by erosion, which has accelerated since 1965-73. The daily operation of Glen Canyon Dam probably did not cause accelerated erosion in eastern Grand Canyon, although the presence of the dam indirectly effects erosion. Generally, sites are eroded by arroyo cutting in the short, ephemeral streams that drain the terraces of the river corridor. These streams are small; 90 percent have catchment area less than 20,000-30,000 m 2 and channel length of less than 300-400 m. Driven by excessive rainfall, arroyo cutting deepens, widens, and expands the channel system. The extent of arroyo cutting is related to past and present depositional levels of the river, which are local baselevels of erosion. The post-dam level is 3-4 m below the lowest pre-dam level; this decrease resulted from elimination of the annual flood and a six-fold reduction of sediment load. Eighty percent of tributary streams end above or on the post-dam depositional level, but during large runoff the channels are free to extend upslope as well as downslope toward the river. These channels will eventually extend downslope to the river, where the channel gradient will be lowered 3-4 m. Arroyo cutting will be intensified until channel gradients adjust to the post-dam baselevel.

Arizona↗