Geology topics

Rebecca A. VanderLeest

Publications and source records attributed to Rebecca A. VanderLeest.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Mid-Cretaceous porphyritic magmatism in the Beartooth Mountains of the northern Laramide foreland and its connection to Frontier Formation sediment dispersal in Bighorn basin, Montana-Wyoming (USA), and Cordilleran tectonism

Porphyritic intrusions in the southeast Beartooth Mountains and porphyritic cobbles from the Torchlight conglomerate of the Cenomanian Frontier Formation in Bighorn basin (Montana-Wyoming, USA) bear striking resemblance. We utilize geologic mapping, petrography, geochemistry, and geochronology to characterize rocks from both locations and test whether the Beartooth Mountains area was the provenance for Bighorn basin cobbles. Mapping on Line Creek Plateau in the Beartooth Mountains shows three units with porphyritic phenocrysts consisting dominantly of plagioclase, plagioclase + potassium feldspar, and plagioclase + quartz. Petrography shows embayed quartz, opacitic rims, and zoned plagioclase. Geochemistry characterizes the intrusions as trachydacite to trachyte and trace elements exhibit enrichment in light rare earth elements and slight depletion in heavy rare earth elements relative to primitive mantle. Zircon U-Pb dating shows substantial Archean inheritance and ca. 104−92 Ma dates; some samples display multiple mid-Cretaceous date populations. Bighorn basin porphyritic cobbles exhibit similar modal mineralogy, near-identical geochemistry, and Archean inheritance and mid-Cretaceous geochronology. We suggest the porphyritic cobbles were sourced from basement-hosted porphyritic intrusions now exposed in the Beartooth Mountains, given that geochemistry does not agree with coeval volcanic sources along the Frontier Formation depositional fairway (Idaho batholith) or sedimentary-hosted Beartooth Mountains porphyritic sills intruded into Cambrian shale. Stratigraphic evidence does not support kilometer-scale mid-Cretaceous Beartooth Mountains exhumation to expose basement-hosted porphyritic intrusions, and we therefore present a volcanic hypothesis to bring rocks to the surface. This mid-Cretaceous multimillion-year magmatism is unexplained by tectonic models for the north-central Laramide foreland, and thus we further explore the emplacement processes, spatiotemporal significance, and tectonic implications of these rocks.

Montana, Wyoming↗

USGS2026

Multi-proxy thermal history of basin heating during Cordilleran orogenesis in the Magallanes-Austral retroarc foreland basin, Patagonian Andes

Resolving thermal histories in sedimentary basins is crucial for interpreting orogenic growth, basin burial, and tectonic processes during Cordilleran orogenesis. In the Magallanes–Austral Basin, Patagonian Andes, we integrate new (U-Th)/He thermochronology, vitrinite reflectance (%R o ), calcite-cement clumped isotope data and thermal history modelling to resolve the origin of the regionally extensive Paleogene unconformity (51°S–50°S). Thermal history modelling results require post-depositional heating of Palaeocene (Danian–Selandian) strata below the unconformity and suggest maximum burial temperatures of 87°C–101°C (55–52 Ma) and 89°C–92°C (18–16 Ma). For lower Eocene strata above the unconformity, Miocene burial temperatures (89°C–92°C) are consistent with calcite cement formation temperatures (~62°C–92°C) from carbonate clumped isotopes. Our results indicate that basin burial and heating between ca. 60 and 52 Ma were likely driven by shallowing of the subducting Farallon plate and enhanced plate coupling preceding arrival of the Farallon–Phoenix mid-ocean ridge. Subsequent basin inversion and cooling from ca. 52 to 44 Ma correspond with subduction of this mid-ocean ridge. Refined thermal models, constrained by expanded thermochronometric and organic maturation datasets, indicate that up to ~1.7–2.0 km of proximal foreland basin strata were removed during uplift and erosion across the Paleogene basin margin. A return to basin subsidence beginning ca. 44 Ma may reflect dynamic subsidence after passage of the mid-ocean ridge and renewed coupling between the fold-thrust belt and foreland basin system. Neogene thermal histories document continued subsidence, localized hot orogenic fluid flow along stratigraphic boundaries, followed by a final phase of basin inversion and cooling at ca. 18–16 Ma, which we attribute to regional uplift associated with Chile ridge subduction. Altogether, this study demonstrates that multiple thermal indices when analysed and modelled can provide clarity for tectonic and stratigraphic events that affect foreland basins.

Patagonian Andes↗

USGS2022

Tectonic subsidence modeling of diachronous transition from backarc to retroarc basin development and uplift during Cordilleran orogenesis, Patagonian-Fuegian Andes

Backstripped tectonic basin subsidence histories are critical for interpreting phases of lithospheric deformation and paleoenvironmental change from the stratigraphic record. This study presents new subsidence modeling of the Rocas Verdes Backarc Basin (RVB) and Magallanes-Austral retroarc foreland basin (MAB) of southernmost South America to evaluate along-strike changes in tectonic subsidence related to the Late Jurassic through Miocene history of the Southern Andes. We compiled composite stratigraphic sections for seven basin localities that span 47°–54°S from published sedimentological records of paleoenvironment, paleobathymetry, and geochronology. Modeling results resolve regional trends in basin tectonic subsidence, uplift, and sedimentation rate that influenced the depositional environment during five broad phases of RVB-MAB development: (a) Late Jurassic tectonic subsidence and basin deepening associated with rift-related backarc extension that postdated regional diachronous rift-related magmatism. (b) Southward younging of Early to Late Cretaceous pronounced acceleration in tectonic subsidence interpreted as the initiation of flexural loading and development of the MAB foreland basin system. (c) Late Cretaceous (ca. 85–70 Ma) tectonic uplift within the central foredeep ∼49° to 52°S, coeval with a shift from slope to shelf deposition at these latitudes. (d) A protracted period of low-magnitude basin uplift and relative tectonic quiescence during the Paleogene, with the exception of southernmost localities; and (e) Synchronous latest Oligocene-early Miocene tectonic subsidence linked to basin deepening and transgression across the northern and central basin sectors. Backstripped tectonic subsidence analysis corroborates existing interpretations for orogenic development in the RVB-MAB and sheds new light on complex polyphase basin histories where extension precedes convergence.

Andes Mountains, Magallanes-Austral retroarc forel↗

USGS2020

Detrital record of the late Oligocene – Early Miocene mafic volcanic arc in the southern Patagonian Andes (~51 °S) from single-clast geochronology and trace element geochemistry

Retroarc foreland basins are important archives of continental arc magmatism and upper plate deformational processes that control the evolution of continental lithosphere. However, resolving source areas in foreland basin infill dominated from mixed mafic and recycled sediment using conventional methods such as detrital zircon geochronology poses a challenge to thorough analysis due to lower zircon fertility and the higher susceptibility to weathering of mafic lithologies. Here, we integrate whole rock 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology and major and trace element geochemistry data from volcanic clasts from the lower Miocene infill of the Magallanes-Austral Basin and local Sierra Baguales intrusive rocks to understand the distribution of mafic sources and Neogene changes in arc magmatism in between multiple ridge subduction events in the southern Patagonian Andes. Potential source areas for the coarse-grained mafic detritus include the Eocene plateau lavas, the Late Jurassic-Miocene Southern Patagonian batholith, and the Late Jurassic Sarmiento Ophiolitic Complex. Published detrital zircon U-Pb age spectra suggest that all three sources are viable contributors to the basin, though the paucity of Jurassic and Eocene zircons preclude these as major sources. Here, new 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating of the volcanic clasts from the early Miocene Río Guillermo Formation reveals latest Oligocene to early Miocene eruptive ages (∼25-22 Ma), indicating syndepositional eruption with the ancestral Río Guillermo fluvial sedimentation. A single dated clast yields a Late Cretaceous age (∼102 Ma). The clasts are dominantly basaltic andesite with Ba/Ta ∼500-1000, La/Ta >20, and Ba/La >15, indicating an arc-derived melt source. We propose that the clasts record a Miocene mafic continental arc source area in the Patagonian Andes, which has since been removed by erosion and is thus sparsely represented in the batholith. Furthermore, we suggest that this early Miocene phase of arc volcanism, which postdates Eocene and Oligocene backarc magmatism and pre-dates middle Miocene to recent Chile Ridge backarc magmatism, reflects a return to normal arc volcanism along the Patagonian margin following a cessation due to ridge subduction and subsequent slab window migration. New geochemistry and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data from a basaltic dike in the Sierra Baguales, which crosscuts the Cenozoic stratigraphic section, records plateau magmatism ∼16 Ma associated with incipient Chile Ridge slab window volcanism.

Patagonian Andes↗