Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

R.E. Wager

Publications and source records attributed to R.E. Wager.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Importance of neutron energy distribution in borehole activation analysis in relatively dry, low-porosity rocks

To evaluate the importance of variations in the neutron energy distribution in borehole activation analysis, capture gamma-ray measurements were made in relatively dry, low-porosity gabbro of the Duluth Complex. Although sections of over a meter of solid rock were encountered in the borehole, there was significant fracturing with interstitial water leading to a substantial variation of water with depth in the borehole. The linear-correlation coefficients calculated for the peak intensities of several elements compared to the chemical core analyses were generally poor throughout the depth investigated. The data suggest and arguments are given which indicate that the variation of the thermal-to-intermediate-to-fast neutron flux density as a function of borehole depth is a serious source of error and is a major cause of the changes observed in the capture gamma-ray peak intensities. These variations in neutron energy may also cause a shift in the observed capture gamma-ray energy.

Geoexploration↗

Field experiments to test neutron interaction techniques in boreholes in relatively dry, low porosity rock

Depending on the technique, there are a number of problems associated with in situ neutron activation elemental analyses in boreholes. Several techniques of using delayed and capture gamma rays for in situ borehole spectral analysis were tried in a relatively dry gabbro. Using copper as a test element the best results using a delayed gamma-ray method were obtained by independent uniform neutron irradiation of the borehole followed by a delay time of about 16 hours before spectral analysis. The results obtained for several other elements measured by both delayed and capture gamma-ray methods, however, showed poor correlation with the chemical analyses. The change in the nonthermal compared with thermal neutron flux density in the rock appears to be the most serious cause of the poor correlation observed. This in turn affects the gamma-ray peak intensities and energies. Errors in the driller's log, poor correspondence between the core chemistry and the sample, and interstation interference also contributed substantially to the poor results.

Open-File Report↗