Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Peter B. Flemings

Publications and source records attributed to Peter B. Flemings.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Terrebonne Basin northern Gulf of Mexico, 30 July-28 September 2023

In the summer and fall of 2023, the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Hydrate Coring Expedition (UT-GOM2-2) drilled, cored, made downhole measurements, and analyzed samples from the seafloor to the base of the gas hydrate stability zone in one location (Site H, WR313) in the Terrebonne basin, deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Analyses of data and samples from the expedition will inform biological, geochemical, and geomechanical models to constrain the role of gas hydrates in the carbon cycle and the potential for gas hydrates as an energy resource. Pressure and conventional cores were collected continuously to a depth of 155.1 meters below the seafloor (mbsf). At deeper depths, cores were taken periodically from hydrate-bearing sands and their bounding muds to a total depth of 861.3 mbsf. 162.6 m of conventional core and 54.8 m of pressure core were obtained. Twelve temperature measurements were made between 27.1 and 144.5 mbsf to determine the geothermal gradient. At the seafloor, more than 4 m of sandy silt of unknown origin was encountered. Beneath this sand, to a depth of ~200 mbsf, the section was composed of interbedded mud and biogenic carbonate ooze. The biogenic ooze correlated to low density and high porosity intervals observed in the previously acquired logging while drilling (LWD) data and as measured. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy constrains the entire record to the Pleistocene (< 0.91 million years) with a pronounced increase in sedimentation rate with depth. Beneath 200 mbsf, the section was predominantly composed of mud with two thicker, hydrate-bearing coarse-grained intervals, which are commonly known as the Blue and Orange sands. The dissolved gas concentration was quantified from pressure cores. In the shallow section, dissolved methane concentration increased below the sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) and reaches saturation (the limit of solubility for methane) at 147 mbsf. Gas expansion was very common in conventional and depressurized pressure (conventionalized) cores below the SMTZ. At deeper depths, the methane concentration within muds bounding the Blue and Orange reservoirs was generally found to be less than saturation. The dissolved and hydrate gas composition is consistent with a microbial source, containing greater than 99.99% methane and only trace concentrations of ethane, propane, and butane. The methane to ethane ratio (C 1 /C 2 ) and the methane to ethane plus propane (C 1 /(C 2 +C 3 )) decrease with depth down to at least 678 mbsf, mainly driven by the increase in ethane with depth. It is unclear if this trend continues through the Orange sand interval. The δ 13 C isotopic signature of methane ranges between -69.9 and -78.5 ‰ Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). Pressure core recovery of all sandy intervals was poor. However, pressure core logs of the Orange sand show intervals of low density and high velocity, which are indicative of high hydrate saturation. One core from within the Orange sand was composed of interbedded graded sandy silt and mud. The sandy silts from this core are composed of mainly quartz and feldspar with some lithics. Most of the recovered pressure core samples are maintained at near in-situ pressure and temperature (within the hydrate stability field) at the University of Texas Pressure Core Center awaiting analysis. In the shallow section, samples will be used to determine the flux of organic carbon through the basin system, find the rate at which that carbon was consumed, and understand the microbial population responsible for these processes. In the deeper section, samples from in and around the hydrate reservoirs will be used to determine the petrophysical properties of the reservoir and bounding seals in these systems.

Gulf of Mexico, Terrebonne Basin

Thermodynamic insights into the production of methane hydrate reservoirs from depressurization of pressure cores

We present results of slow (multiple day) depressurization experiments of pressure cores recovered from Green Canyon Block 955 in the northern Gulf of Mexico during The University of Texas at Austin Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition (UT-GOM2-1). These stepwise depressurization experiments monitored the pressure and temperature within the core storage chamber during each pressure step, or “shut-in” period to better understand dissociation behavior and to provide insight on the thermodynamic state of gas hydrate reservoirs during production. The pressure rebound that occurs in response to a depressurization step occurs more slowly during later dissociation steps, likely reflecting a slower heat transfer rate, decreasing salinity gradient, and increased compressibility of the pore and surrounding fluids with progressive dissociation. We demonstrate that displacement of water by gas within the core storage chamber during successive dissociations both insulates the core and increases the compressibility of the pore and chamber fluid. The increased compressibility requires that a larger hydrate volume dissociates per unit of pressure recovery. Pressures observed during progressive dissociation steps are lower than predicted by the sample’s average salinity, with pressures approaching the freshwater phase boundary during frequent dissociation steps, suggesting that local pore-water freshening strongly influences dissociation behavior. To avoid underestimating the magnitude of pressure drawdown required to sustain dissociation in the reservoir, we suggest that hydrate production models use the freshwater phase boundary rather than a phase boundary determined from bulk salinity.

Green Canyon Block 955 (GC 955) study area, northe

Pressure coring operations during The University of Texas-Gulf of Mexico 2-1 (UT-GOM2-1) Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition in Green Canyon Block 955, northern Gulf of Mexico

In May 2017, The University of Texas Hydrate Pressure Coring Expedition Gulf of Mexico 2-1 (UT-GOM2-1) drilled two adjacent holes in Green Canyon Block 955 in the deep-water Gulf of Mexico as part of The University of Texas at Austin and US Department of Energy Deepwater Methane Hydrate Characterization and Scientific Assessment. Expedition operations included testing two configurations of a rotary pressure-coring tool in a gas hydrate–bearing formation. In the first hole, an extended core barrel (cutting shoe) configuration of the Pressure Coring Tool with Ball Valve (PCTB-CS) was deployed, and in the second hole, the PCTB face bit configuration (PCTB-FB) was deployed. The PCTB-CS successfully recovered and maintained pressure for only one core out of eight deployments. A series of incremental modifications were made during and after the PCTB-CS deployment period that impacted the operations of the subsequent PCTB-FB deployments. Thus, in the second hole, the PCTB-FB successfully recovered and maintained pressure within the hydrate stability zone for 11 cores out of 13 deployments. The PCTB cored gas hydrate–bearing sandy silt interbedded with non–hydrate-bearing clayey silt within the main reservoir. The PCTB also recovered long intervals of unbroken, high-quality core with preserved sedimentary structures. We recovered one pressure core 130 m (437 ft) above the main hydrate reservoir in the silty clay. Pressure coring is the only available technology for recovering intact cores from sediment that is normally disturbed by gas expansion, dissolution, or dissociation; this allows a wide range of scientific measurements to be obtained with minimal disturbance to the core sediment fabric. Analysis of pressure cores has the potential to illuminate the in situ properties, gas saturation, and gas composition of a wide range of reservoirs including unconventional shale systems.

AAPG Bulletin

Mechanisms of methane hydrate formation in geological systems

Natural gas hydrates are ice-like mixtures of gas (mostly methane) and water that are widely found in sediments along the world’s continental margins and within and beneath permafrost in a near-surface depth interval where the pressure is sufficiently high and temperature sufficiently low for gas hydrate to be stable. Beneath this interval, gas hydrate is not stable and free gas may be present. This paper reviews the multiple quantitative models that have proposed to describe the genesis of gas hydrate in geological systems. We emphasize the importance of coupling multi-phase flow (vapor and liquid) and multicomponent reactive transport with geological history to describe the dynamical processes of gas hydrate formation and evolution in geological systems. By understanding the generation and evolution of gas hydrate through time, we will better understand their role in the carbon cycle, their potential to contribute to climate change and geohazards, and how to design optimal strategies for the environmentally safe production of gas from hydrate reservoirs.

Reviews of Geophysics