Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Nancy R. Stamm

Publications and source records attributed to Nancy R. Stamm.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

The USGS National Geologic Map Database – Resource for geoscience professionals and the public

Since 1996, the US Geological Survey (USGS) National Geologic Map Database (NGMDB) has served the public and private sectors and is widely recognized as one of the few authoritative resources for the information published by the nation’s geological surveys. On a monthly basis, the NGMDB website receives more than 600,000 visits by about 200,000 users (~20,000 visits per day). In a typical month, between 2 and 3 TB of content are viewed or downloaded. This high level of web traffic results in many user requests for information and assistance. Users vary widely in interest and background and include homeowners, students, local government planners, and professional geologists and engineers. Many professionals use NGMDB information for understanding natural conditions that affect infrastructure, such as drainage, ground stability, properties of near-surface earth materials, and depth to rock.

Conference Paper↗

The National Park Service stratotype inventory

Introduction An Inventory of Stratigraphic Origins within the National Park Service The geologic history of Earth is recorded in layers or bodies of rock that are classified in a hierarchical order with several different categories of geologic units, including: supergroup, group, formation, member, bed, supersuite, suite, or complex. Geologists analyze and classify rock types based on properties that include lithology, texture, thickness, sedimentary structures, fossils, geographic or geospatial distribution, and age. In instances where new geologic units are proposed, a stratotype is assigned to a designated section, locality, or area of well-exposed rock that displays diagnostic characteristics for identification and correlation. Stratotypes are also namesakes, in that formally recognized rock units are named for the places where they were first described, measured, and mapped. Thus, a vast majority of the stratigraphic nomenclature alludes to geographic or geologic features. Some particularly recognizable examples (and their stratotype assignments) include the Paleoproterozoic Vishnu Schist (Vishnu Canyon in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona), the Early Cambrian Harpers Formation (Harpers Ferry National Historical Park, West Virginia), and the Late Cretaceous Whitney Granodiorite (Mount Whitney in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California). Beginning in 2020, the National Park Service (NPS) began a systematic effort to document the occurrence of stratotypes exposed within, partially within, and near NPS administrative boundaries. The NPS stratotype inventory project represents an important component of a geologic resource inventory, as these designations are vital to our national geologic heritage (herein referred to as “geoheritage”) and possess significant scientific, historic, educational, cultural, and aesthetic values. The geoheritage significance of stratotypes is analogous to libraries and museums, in that they are geologic landmarks of Earth history and record the prodigious forces and evolving life forms that define our understanding of the planet. These designated exposures preserve knowledge, represent comparative geologic references where previous observations can be re-examined or reinterpreted, and can serve as valuable educational tools for future geoscientists (Brocx and others, 2019). The NPS stratotype inventory includes the following: Documentation of designated stratotype exposures to confirm their geospatial occurrence within, partially within, and near NPS administrative boundaries, compiled from published reports and maps; Compilation and visualization of the precise geographic locations of the stratotype exposures; and Recommendations that address potential land and resource management issues associated with NPS stratotypes. By achieving these goals, this project helps to raise awareness of stratotypes as a geologic resource by educating NPS staff and the public so that they may better understand, recognize, and protect these important park resources. The focused approach adopted for conducting the stratotype inventories throughout the NPS has centered on the 32 Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) networks established by the NPS during the late 1990s (for more information on each network, see https://www.nps.gov/im/networks.htm). The I&M networks represent groups or clusters of park units that are based on shared geography and natural resource characteristics. The Greater Yellowstone I&M Network, encompassing Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, Grand Teton National Park, John D. Rockefeller Jr. Memorial Parkway, and Yellowstone National Park, was used as the pilot network for initiating this stratotype inventory and was first published in November 2020 (Henderson and others, 2020). The 32d and final report on the Northeast Temperate I&M Network was published in October 2022 (Henderson and others, 2022). Currently, the NPS stratotype inventory project has identified more than 700 stratotypes within NPS administrative boundaries.

Professional Paper↗

“Stratigraphic Notes”—An outlet for stratigraphic studies

Introduction Welcome to the resurrected series of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports on stratigraphy, entitled “Stratigraphic Notes”; this initial volume is called “Stratigraphic Notes— Volume 1, 2022.” For several decades, until the mid-1990s, the USGS published volumes of short papers that highlighted stratigraphic studies, changes in stratigraphic nomenclature, and explanations of stratigraphic names and concepts used on published geologic maps. The purpose was to encourage formal documentation on these topics. Today (2023) the need for such documentation has become especially important because of the increasing number of published field-trip guidebooks and open-file reports that use new or updated stratigraphic nomenclature; however, field-trip guidebooks and open-file reports cannot be referenced as authoritative documentation of stratigraphic studies because the North American Stratigraphic Code (NASC) considers such guidebooks and reports to be informal and does not recognize them as proper publications to formalize stratigraphic studies (see Article 4 of the NASC, in North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature [NACSN], 2021). Hence, a report series such as “Stratigraphic Notes” is needed to bridge this gap.

Professional Paper↗

Suggestions for proposing changes in nomenclature in papers submitted to “Stratigraphic Notes”

The “Stratigraphic Notes” series is intended to be an outlet for publication of short papers on stratigraphy, changes in stratigraphic nomenclature, and explanation of stratigraphic names and concepts used on published geologic maps. This report provides authors with suggestions for the content and format of papers submitted to “Stratigraphic Notes” in which geologic names are proposed or their definitions and supporting information are modified. These suggestions are based on the guidance and rules found in the North American Stratigraphic Code (North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature [NACSN], 2021) and from experience compiling the U.S. Geologic Names Lexicon (Geolex, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/ ). It is with the hope that authors will find these suggestions useful when organizing and presenting their observations and interpretations in a succinct and straightforward fashion, appropriate to “Stratigraphic Notes” (see also, U.S. Geological Survey, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987, 1991, 1994a, b, 1995). Appendix 1 contains suggested topics and their section headings and subheadings for papers submitted to “Stratigraphic Notes” on new geologic names or changes to names. Within the body of this report, guidance on the content of these sections is provided; for reasons of clarity, suggestions that pertain to changes to formal geologic names are discussed separately from those for proposing new names. Note that, herein, the term “geologic name” is used interchangeably with “geologic unit” and refers to a three-dimensional body of earth material (rock or sediment), recognized by its lithologic content and its boundaries at the surface and (or) subsurface.

Professional Paper↗

Divisions of geologic time—Major chronostratigraphic and geochronologic units

Introduction Effective communication in the geosciences requires consistent use of stratigraphic nomenclature, especially divisions of geologic time. A geologic time scale is composed of standard stratigraphic divisions that are based on rock sequences and is calibrated in years (Harland and others, 1982). Over the years, the development of new dating methods and the refinement of previous ones have stimulated revisions to geologic time scales. Since the mid-1990s, geologists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), State geological surveys, academia, and other organizations have sought a consistent time scale that can be used in communicating ages of geologic units in the United States. Many international debates have occurred over the names and boundaries of units, and various time scales have been used by the geoscience community in years past (for example, U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Names Committee [USGS GNC], 2007, 2010, 2018). However, the numerical ages assigned to geochronologic units frequently change as the science of stratigraphy moves forward. Once ratified, changes in numerical ages are recorded by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) on their website ( https://stratigraphy.org/chart ). In addition, such advances in stratigraphy and changes in geochronology require that any time scale be periodically updated. Therefore, the time scale presented in this report (hereafter referred to as “Divisions of Geologic Time”) is dynamic, and it is modified as needed to include accepted changes of unit names and boundary age estimates (USGS GNC, 2007, 2010, 2018).

Professional Paper↗

Conodont color alteration index (CAI) map and conodont-based age determinations for the Winchester 30' x 60' Quadrangle and adjacent area, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland

Most of the conodont data presented in this report (table 1) were acquired to support 1:100,000-scale geologic mapping of the Winchester 30' X 60' quadrangle by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Conodonts were chosen to provide a biostratigraphic framework for the Upper Cambrian to Mississippian marine carbonate rocks that make up about 25 percent of the Paleozoic strata exposed in the quadrangle (~2,130 m of the approximately 9,450 m) of Paleozoic strata exposed in the quadrangle). Thickness of stratigraphic units are from McDowell (1991), our own measurements, and from many of the stratigraphic reports and geologic maps listed in the references cited. Conodont biostratigraphic and color alteration index (CAI) analyses help identify stratigraphic units and structural discontinuities, particularly in the Upper Cambrian to Middle Ordovician chiefly carbonate rocks of the Shenandoah Valley and North Mountain fault zone. Conodont biofacies analyses provide additional information about the provincial affinities of the conodonts and the depositional environment of the rocks that contain them. Lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic, paleoenvironmental, and CAI data for all conodont samples are given in table 1.

Maryl;Virginia;West Virginia↗