Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Michael W. Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Michael W. Smith.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effectiveness of the addition of alkaline materials at surface coal mines in preventing or abating acid mine drainage--Part 2. Mine site case studies

The effectiveness of preventing or ameliorating acid mine drainage (AMD) through the application of alkaline additives is evaluated for eight surface coal mines in Pennsylvania. Many of the mine sites had overburden characteristics that made prediction of post‐mining water quality uncertain. Alkaline materials were applied at rates ranging from 42 to greater than 1,000 tons as calcium carbonate per acre. In addition, two sites that were mined and reclaimed without alkaline additives are included for comparative purposes. Overburden sulfur concentration and "neutralization potential" (NP) data for multiple strata at each mine site were used to compute the cumulative, mass‐weighted "maximum potential acidity" (MPA) and "net neutralization potential" (NNP = NP ‐ MPA) by using three different calculation methods. Post‐reclamation water‐quality data were used to compute the net alkalinity (= alkalinity ‐ acidity). The most conservative determination of NNP, whereby MPA is calculated by multiplying the total sulfur concentration, in weight percent, by 62.5 instead of 31.25, yielded the best agreement with net alkalinity (patching signs on NNP and net alkalinity). The error in prediction using each method was that the reclaimed overburden was computed to be alkaline overall (NNP > 0), but the post‐reclamation water was acid (net alkalinity < 0). In general, alkaline addition rates were probably insufficient to neutralize, or too late to prevent, acid production in the mine spoil. At six of the seven mine sites that had overburden with insufficient NP relative to MPA (NNP < 0), the addition of alkaline materials failed to create alkaline mine drainage; AMD was formed or persisted. A control site which also had insufficient alkaline material, but did not incorporate alkaline additives, generated severe AMD. Two sites that had substantial, natural alkaline overburden produced alkaline drainage. Although the addition rates appear to be inadequate, other factors, such as unequal distribution and exposure of the acid‐forming or neutralizing materials and hydrogeological variability, complicate the evaluation of relative effectiveness of using different alkaline materials and placement of the acid‐ or alkaline‐producing materials.

Pennsylvania

Effectiveness of the addition of alkaline materials at surface coal mines in preventing or abating acid mine drainage--Part 1. Geochemical considerations

The addition of alkaline materials to supplement deficient "neutralization potential" (NP) of mine spoil, and thus to prevent or abate acid mine drainage, has riot been successful at most surface coal mines in Pennsylvania. A basic problem may have been improper accounting for acid‐production potential and thus inadequate addition rates of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), calcium oxide (CaO) , or calcium hydroxide [ Ca (OH) 2 ] at many mines. The commonly used acid‐base accounting method is based on the following overall reaction: FeS 2 + 2 CaCO 3 + 3.75 O 2 + 1.5 H 2 O --> Fe(OH) 3 + 2 SO 4 -2 + 2 Ca +2 +2 CO 2 (g), where the acidity from 1 mole of pyrite (FeS2) is neutralized by 2 moles of CaCO 3 . This method presumes that gaseous carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) will exsolve, and therefore may underestimate by up to a factor of 2 the quantity of CaCO 3 required to neutralize the "maximum potential acidity" (MPA) in the mine spoil. This paper reviews some geochemical reactions involving FeS 2 and various alkaline additives that support the argument that the acid‐base accounting method for computing MPA from overburden analyses should be revised. Considering the stoichiometry of the following overall reaction: FeS 2 + 4 CaCO 3 + 3.75 O 2 + 3.5 H 2 O --> Fe(OH) 3 + 2 SO 4 -1 + 4 Ca +2 + 4 HCO 3 - , 4 moles of CaCO 3 are required to neutralize the maximum potential acidity produced by the oxidation of 1 mole of FeS 2 . Therefore, the multiplication factor for computing MPA from the overburden sulfur concentration, in weight percent, should be increased from 31.25 to 62.5.

Conference Paper