Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Michael Connerton

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Connerton.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2025

Factors affecting short-term post-release survival probability of Lake Trout implanted with acoustic telemetry transmitters

The use of acoustic telemetry is steadily expanding to help answer questions related to habitat use, movement, and behavior of fishes. Significant time and resources are invested to start acoustic telemetry studies; therefore, careful planning is needed to limit post-release mortality of tagged individuals. Deep, cold-water species present additional challenges to acoustic tagging because of changes in temperature and pressure experienced during capture. The objective of our study was to determine if capture method, surface water temperature, water depth, or fish size influenced short-term post-release survival of a deep, cold-water species, Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush . In 2023, 299 Lake Trout were captured with angling or gillnets across Lake Ontario (Laurentian Great Lake – U.S. & CAN) and surgically implanted with acoustic transmitters. We estimated 30-day post-release mortality and 24-h post-release distance traveled for tagged Lake Trout. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors affecting survival probability and multiple linear regression to identify factors affecting post-release distance traveled. Thirty-day post-release mortality was minimal (9.03 %, 27/299 Lake Trout); however, mortality was 6.37 times more likely for Lake Trout captured in gillnets compare to angling ( p = 0.003). Lake Trout length had a marginally significant effect on mortality ( p = 0.052) but capture depth and temperature did not ( p > 0.05). Lake Trout post-release distance traveled was not significantly influenced by capture gear, depth, temperature, or Lake Trout length ( p = 0.61). Our results indicate that tagging-induced post-release mortality is minimal for Lake Trout tagged in the spring, but survival can be increased by avoiding use of gillnets.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2025

Lake Ontario August gillnet survey and Lake Trout assessment, 2024

Lake Ontario Lake Trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) rehabilitation has been assessed with fishery independent surveys to evaluate program benchmarks and compare observations with management objectives since 1983. These surveys provide information on the abundance, strain composition, and performance of stocked Lake Trout, as well as information on levels of natural recruitment, and Sea Lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus ) wounding rates. In 2024, the gillnet survey occurred in United States (US) and Canadian waters marking the first lake-wide Lake Trout assessment since 2008. Lake Trout catch per unit effort (CPUE) was higher in US than Canadian waters. Recaptures of stocked fish with coded wire tags occurred mostly in US waters, and were composed of the following strains: Lake Champlain, Seneca Lake, Superior Klondike Reef, and Huron Parry Sound. Percentage of naturally produced Lake Trout in US waters continued to be relatively low for mature and immature fish. Interestingly, the percentage of naturally produced Lake Trout was higher in Canadian waters, despite lower total numbers of Lake Trout caught. Sea Lamprey wounding rates on Lake Trout > 432 mm in 2024 were above management targets in US and Canadian waters. Overall, the 2024 survey results suggest that Lake Trout indicators continue to meet some of the management objectives and show spatial differences in overall abundance and the proportion of stocked vs wild fish between the US and Canadian stocks.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2024

U.S. Geological Survey Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science research to rehabilitate native prey fish of the Lake Ontario fish community—Coregonine fishes

Restoration of native coregonines to Lake Ontario of the Laurentian Great Lakes will improve the diversity of forage for salmonid predators and ecological function in the lake, but efficacy of experimental releases for native species restoration must be evaluated. The Coregonine Research Program at the U.S. Geological Survey Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science encompassed a diverse array of research, with an emphasis on improved culture methods and field assessments of experimentally released juvenile coregonines. This research was carried out to support the Fish Community Objectives of the Lake Ontario Committee, is funded largely by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and was done in collaboration with other laboratories and agencies, particularly, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; and other U.S. Geological Survey laboratories. The Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science and partners have developed new and innovative hatchery techniques to raise cisco and bloater to life stages suitable for survival in Lake Ontario; assessed adult bloater survival in Lake Ontario; and evaluated survival, return rate, and reproduction of adult cisco in historic spawning locations in Lake Ontario embayments. Successes, challenges, and research needs are discussed.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2024

Histological analysis of deepwater sculpin ovaries supports single spawning reproductive strategy

Deepwater sculpin ( Myoxocephalus thompsonii ) were considered extirpated from Lake Ontario prior to the 1990s but have since resurged and are now an abundant offshore demersal species. As deepwater sculpin reproduction is poorly described, an investigation of their gonadal development and fecundity was conducted to better understand their reproductive biology. To evaluate spawning period duration and if females spawn multiple times during their spawning period, we compared deepwater sculpin gonadosomatic index (GSI), gonadal development, and fecundity using individuals collected in fall and spring from 2018 to 2021. Our analysis revealed female GSI was greater in fall (8.1 ± 6.2 %) than spring (4.4 ± 4.3 %). Absolute fecundity averaged 763 ± 246 oocytes and relative fecundity averaged 19 ± 6 oocytes per gram of fish. Histological analysis revealed the presence of only one batch of developing oocytes in the ovary (n = 60), indicating group-synchronous ovarian organization. Our findings suggest deepwater sculpin spawn once annually but have a protracted spawning season indicated by prolonged elevated GSI values. Therefore, protracted spawning in deepwater sculpin likely results in an extended period of larval emergence rather than the majority occurring in late spring as previously suggested. A longer timeframe for deepwater sculpin larval emergence may increase reproductive success and contribute to their population’s recovery.

Journal of Great Lakes Research↗
USGS2024

Lake Ontario August gillnet survey and Lake Trout assessment, 2023

Lake Ontario lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) rehabilitation has been annually assessed with fishery independent surveys since 1983, to evaluate program benchmarks and compare observations with management objectives. These surveys provide information on the abundance, strain composition, and condition of the adult lake trout stock, as well as information on levels of natural recruitment, sea lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus ) wounding rates, and abundance indices of other coldwater fish species (burbot Lota lota , cisco C oregonus artedi , and lake whitefish C. clupeaformis ). In 2023, the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of total lake trout in gillnets was notably lower (12.1 fish/net) compared to recent survey years 2018–2022 (average = 17.3 ± 1.0 SD fish/net). CPUE of mature females fell below target levels. Wildproduced mature lake trout remain rare in the adult population (1.0% of adult catch). Strain composition of stocked fish indicated approximately half (51%) of all coded wire tagged lake trout captured in 2023 were from the Superior Klondike strain. Sea lamprey wounding rates decreased in 2023 and were near the target level (2.09 A1 wounds per 100 lake trout). Lake trout condition (predicted weight at length) remains high. Overall, the 2023 survey results suggest that lake trout indicators continue to meet some of the management objectives, however, recruitment of wild-produced offspring to the adult stock continues to be limited, and abundance of stocked fish may be decreasing relative to recent years in response to reduced stocking levels.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2023

Field and laboratory validation of new sampling gear to quantify coregonine egg deposition and larval emergence across spawning habitat gradients

The influence of habitat and environmental conditions on Great Lakes coregonine reproduction is not well described, in part, because we lack sampling gears for early life stages that are effective across habitats. We designed new egg and larval emergence traps to quantify coregonine reproductive success across variable depths and substrates and tested them in laboratory and field settings. In the laboratory, our new metal ring egg traps had greater egg retention (94–100%) and faster post-catch processing (5–7 min) relative to a commonly employed fiber mat trap (30–67% and 30–60 min). In Lake Ontario’s Chaumont Bay, egg densities for lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis (0–5,832 eggs m −2 ) and cisco Coregonus artedi (0–426,501 eggs m −2 ) measured with metal ring traps (n = 112) varied across habitats but were greatest between 2–5 m on rock and dreissenid mussel substrates. Emergence traps used an inverted cone, fine mesh, and a clear collection chamber to capture positively phototactic emerging larvae. In the laboratory, traps captured 69–80% of emerged larvae. In Chaumont Bay, emergence traps deployed for 21 days after ice out caught only cisco larvae. Emergence rates varied across habitats (0–118 larvae m −2 day −1 , n = 85) but were highest on dreissenid mussel reef substrate. Our samplers improved processing efficiency and facilitated large sample sizes to quantify variability in egg deposition densities and emergence rates across habitats. These methods can advance coregonine conservation by determining how anthropogenic changes to habitat and environmental conditions influence incubation success.

Journal of Great Lakes Research↗
USGS2022

Results of the collaborative Lake Ontario bloater restoration stocking and assessment, 2012–2020

Bloater, Coregonus hoyi , are deepwater planktivores native to the Laurentian Great Lakes and Lake Nipigon. Interpretations of commercial fishery time series suggest they were common in Lake Ontario through the early 1900s but by the 1950s were no longer captured by commercial fishers. Annual bottom trawl surveys that began in 1978 and sampled extensively across putative bloater habitat only yielded one individual (1983), suggesting that the species had been locally extirpated. In 2012, a multiagency restoration program stocked bloater into Lake Ontario from gametes collected in Lake Michigan. From 2012 to 2020, 1,028,191 bloater were stocked into Lake Ontario. Bottom trawl surveys first detected stocked fish in 2015, and through 2020 ten bloater have been caught (total length mean = 129 mm, s.d. = 44 mm, range: 96–240 mm). Hatchery applied marks and genetic analyses confirmed the species identification and identified stocking location for some individuals. Trawl capture locations and acoustic telemetry suggested that stocked fish dispersed throughout the main lake within months or sooner, and the depth distribution of recaptured bloater was similar to historic distributions in Lake Ontario and other Great Lakes. Predicted bloater trawl catches, based on modeled population abundance and trawl survey efficiency, were similar to observed catches, suggesting that post-stocking survival is less than 20% and contemporary bottom trawl surveys can quantify bloater abundance at low densities and track restoration.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2022

Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) rehabilitation in Lake Ontario, 2021

Each year we report on the progress toward rehabilitation of the Lake Ontario lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) population, including the results of stocking, annual assessment surveys, creel surveys, and evidence of natural reproduction observed from standard surveys performed by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). The catch per unit effort (CPUE) of adult lake trout in gill nets increased each year from 2008-2014, recovering from historic lows recorded during 2005-2007. Adult abundances declined each year from 2015 to 2017; and in 2017 were about 35% below the 2014 peak and 17% below the 1999-2004 mean. Adult abundance increased in 2018 by 51% over the 2017 value and remained nearly stable between 2018 and 2021. The 2020 rate of wounding by sea lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus ) on lake trout caught in gill nets was 1.68 A1 wounds (fresh wound) per 100 lake trout and was near target (2 wounds per 100 lake trout). Condition values for adult lake trout, indexed in September from the predicted weight for a 700 mm lake trout from annual length-weight regressions and Fulton’s K for age-6 males, were among the highest levels observed for the 1983-2021 time series. Reproductive potential for the adult stock indexed from the CPUE of mature females ≥ 4000 g was again above the target in 2021 continuing a trend observed in ten of the last eleven years. The 2021 catch of young wild lake trout marked the 27th observation in the last 28 years, however only two sites off the mouth of the Niagara River were surveyed.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2021

Stationary hydroacoustics demonstrates vessel avoidance biases during mobile hydroacoustic surveys of alewife in Lake Ontario

Mobile hydroacoustic surveys are routinely used to estimate pelagic fish abundance . In the Great Lakes, alewife are commonly surveyed with mobile hydroacoustics, however, their behavior often has them associated with epilimnetic habitats which increases the potential for vessel avoidance to bias hydroacoustic observations. Abundance estimates from mobile hydroacoustic surveys are typically made using depth and size thresholds to classify targets to species. In hydroacoustic surveys, fish can appear to be smaller when oriented off horizontal axis, as is common with fish displaying vessel avoidance behaviour. This presents a problem where alewives that are diving may appear too small to be correctly classified. We compared alewife swimming behaviours and target strength distributions between stationary up-looking and mobile down-looking hydroacoustics to quantify how vessel avoidance may bias hydroacoustic observations. Alewives from the mobile survey were found to be diving away from the surface, moving faster and in more linear paths than the undisturbed fish from the stationary survey. In the mobile survey, alewives were observed at smaller target strength values than would be expected if boat avoidance was not occurring. Our results suggest that alewife behavioral changes associated with vessel avoidance affect the number and size of targets classified as alewife from mobile hydroacoustic surveys in Lake Ontario.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2021

Incorporation of non-native species in the diets of cisco (Coregonus artedi) from eastern Lake Ontario

Cisco Coregonus artedi was once an important native fish in Lake Ontario; however, after multiple population crashes, the cisco stock has yet to recover to historic abundances. Rehabilitation of cisco in Lake Ontario is a fish community management objective, but the extent to which recent non-native species and pelagic food web changes have influenced cisco is not well understood. We described cisco diets in contemporary Lake Ontario following the addition and spread of non-native zooplankton species. We collected 618 cisco and processed 178 for full diet analysis in eastern Lake Ontario using mid-water trawls and bottom-set gill nets from 2016 to 2020. We found that Lake Ontario cisco were mostly zooplanktivorous, and non-native zooplankton dominated their diet during July and September. Cisco smaller than 300 mm had a more diverse diet including both native and non-native zooplankton, while cisco larger than 300 mm fed almost exclusively on non-native predatory cladocerans Bythotrephes longimanus and Cercopagis pengoi (98.9% consumed prey dry mass). We also found fish eggs, presumed to be of coregonine origin in 75% of non-empty December-collected cisco diets, suggesting eggs subsidize cisco diets when available. Juvenile round goby Neogobius melanostomus , alewife Alosa pseudoharengus and rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax were found in 2% of all analyzed non-empty stomachs. Lake Ontario cisco diet appears to be more similar to zooplanktivorous Lake Superior cisco than Lake Michigan where piscivory is prevalent. Lake Ontario cisco diets reflected zooplankton community changes indicating that non-native predatory cladocerans are now an important energy source supporting this native species.

Eastern Lake Ontario↗
USGS2021

Lake Ontario cisco population dynamics based on long-term surveys

Prior to European settlement, cisco (Coregonus artedi) were likely one of Lake Ontario’s most abundant fishes but currently represent a small portion of the fish community. To understand how the population has changed over the past 70 years we compared trends in annual catch rates from gillnet and bottom trawl surveys and commercial fishery landings. In surveys, cisco were generally rare, and represented 0.2, 0.4, and 0.001% of all fish caught in two gillnet surveys and bottom trawl surveys. Cisco catch rates in gillnets and trawls were positively correlated and correlations increased when gillnet catches two years later were compared to trawls since trawls tended to capture smaller, juvenile-sized cisco relative to gillnets. Survey catch rates suggest recruitment is generally low, but discrete periods of relatively greater recruitment in the 1980s and mid-2010s suggest reproductive conditions for cisco vary temporally. Trawl surveys were the most spatially extensive survey and illustrated catch rates were highest in northeastern Lake Ontario. Greater cisco abundance in this region may be related to more-abundant embayment spawning habitat, greater distance from winter aggregations of nonnative planktivores, or more appropriate environmental conditions during spawing. At the basin scale, Lake Ontario bottom trawl catch per unit effort (CPUE) was positively correlated to Lake Superior trawl CPUE suggesting a regional driver, such as climate, may be similarly impacting both populations. Concurrent patterns across Lake Ontario surveys support the idea that cisco are currently a small portion of the fish community, recruitment remains inconsistent, and habitats in northeastern Lake Ontario appear critical to the remnant populations.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2021

Lake Ontario April prey fish survey and Alewife assessment, 2021

The Lake Ontario April bottom trawl survey and Alewife, Alosa psuedoharengus population assessment are conducted annually to track prey fish community status and aid management decisions related to predator-prey balance. No survey was conducted in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The 2021 survey included 248 bottom trawls in both U.S. and Canadian waters, from March 30 - May 7 in the main lake and embayment regions, at depths ranging from 5 – 221 m (16 - 729 ft). The survey captured 947,102 fish, from 30 species with a total weight of 9,191 kg (20,220 lbs). Alewife were 89.2% of the catch by number while Rainbow Smelt, Osmerus mordax , Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus , and Deepwater Sculpin Myoxocephalus thompsonii comprised 5.6, 2.3, and 1.7% of the catch, respectively. Rainbow Smelt biomass in 2021 was among the highest values observed since 1997, especially in U.S. waters. The biomass index for Cisco, Coregonus artedii also increased, primarily due to catches and greater survey effort in the Bay of Quinte. Threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus and Emerald Shiner, Notropis atherinoides biomasses remain low. No Bloater, Coregonus hoyi were captured during the 2021 survey. In 2021, the lake-wide Alewife biomass index increased substantially from 2019 due to the presence of an exceptionally high catch of age-1 Alewife (2020 year class). The biomass index of adult Alewife (age-2 and up) declined slightly since 2019, which was expected since Alewife reproduction was generally below average from 2016 to 2019. Expanding the survey spatial extent from U.S. waters to a lake-wide survey in 2016 has improved our ability to estimate Alewife survival and has provided more accurate estimates of Lake Ontario Alewife biomass and density. Simulation modeling based on recent estimates of survival, growth, and reproduction suggests the adult Alewife biomass will likely increase in 2022 and 2023. As part of a continued effort to improve prey fish surveys, we employed hydroacoustic sampling during the 2021 April trawl survey to estimate fish densities in open-water, pelagic habitats not sampled by the bottom trawl. We found fish density, in waters above the trawl headline depth (3m off bottom to surface), were approximately ~100 times lower than pelagic prey fish densities from bottom trawls. These results support the idea that at this time of year, when the warmest water is on the lake bottom, Alewife and most other prey fish primarily inhabit deep, near bottom regions and can be effectively sampled with bottom trawls. We were not able to apportion acoustics targets to species, however the low mean target strength (-43 decibels, dB) suggested these were small fishes (e.g., 100 mm). The greatest hydroacoustics densities were found near the Niagara River confluence and future surveys may use midwater trawls to determine which species these were and continue to improve this multi-agency survey.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2021

Angler-caught salmonid diets illustrate Lake Ontario Alewife population and predator-prey dynamics

Lake Ontario fisheries decision makers use information about the status and trajectory of prey fish populations, such as alewife, for salmonid sport fish management. In 2020, the April bottom trawl survey, typically used to assess alewife, was canceled the day after it began due to Coronavirus health concerns. This prompted NYSDEC and USGS science teams to initiate a diet study using angler-collected samples to provide information on the alewife population in 2020. Over 800 salmonid diets were collected from across Lake Ontario southern shore from May through September. Past diet studies illustrated alewife size distribution in piscivore diets overlapped April trawl survey-based distributions (proportion overlap = 0.51- 0.81, n = 5). In 2020 few age-1 sized alewife (40 - 140 mm) were observed in salmonid diets, suggesting that 2019 alewife reproduction was below average. Given that alewife reproductive success from 2017 and 2018 were also below average, the 2021 Lake Ontario adult alewife population will likely be at a record low for the 43-year time series. For all years and piscivore species, adult-sized Alewife ( total length > 140 mm) were the predominate size consumed by piscivores greater than 400 mm (~ 16 inches). Sizes of alewife in the diet were positively related to piscivore size. Diet composition, by dry weight, indicated alewife remain the dominant prey supporting salmonids and diets were generally similar to trawl-based estimates of prey fish community composition. The most notable deviation from this pattern included round goby, which comprised substantial portions of brown trout and lake trout diets in 2013 and 2020. These results inform decision making related to Lake Ontario salmonid stocking and predator prey dynamics and highlight the utility of angler-caught piscivore diets for indicating alewife population status.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2020

Lake trout rehabilitation in Lake Ontario, 2019

Each year we report on the progress toward rehabilitation of the Lake Ontario lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) population, including the results of stocking, annual assessment surveys, creel surveys, and evidence of natural reproduction observed from all standard surveys performed by USGS and NYSDEC. The catch per unit effort of adult lake trout in gill nets increased each year from 2008-2014, recovering from historic lows recorded during 2005-2007. Adult abundances declined each year from 2015 to 2017; and in 2017 were about 35% below the 2014 peak and 17% below the 1999-2004 mean. Adult abundance increased in 2018 by 51% over the 2017 value and increased and addition 16% in 2019. The 2019 rate of wounding by sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) on lake trout caught in gill nets (0.53 A1 wounds (fresh wound) per 100 lake trout) was below target (2 wounds per 100 lake trout). Estimates from the NYSDEC fishing boat survey indicated angler catch rate of lake trout was low in 2019 and among the lowest recorded for the time series. Condition values for an adult lake trout, indexed in September from the predicted weight for a 700mm lake trout from annual length-weight regressions and Fulton’s K for age-6 males, were among the highest levels observed for the 1983-2019 time series. Predicted weight for a 400mm lake trout from July 2019 bottom trawl catches was near the long-term average while age-2 K was among the lowest for the time series. Reproductive potential for the adult stock indexed from the CPUE of mature females ≥ 4000g was again above the target in 2019 continuing a trend observed in nine of the last ten years. The 2019 catch of young native lake trout marked the 25th observation in the last 26 years, however the low numbers of native adults observed during that time period continues to indicate substantial restoration impediments still exist.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2020

Lake trout spawning studies: Updates, new survey, and comparison to standard September gillnet survey

In Lake Ontario, lake trout restoration efforts have not established a self-sustaining population. Herein we describe efforts to evaluate standard and new surveys, and to estimate dispersal from stocking locations, to better understand impediments to natural reproduction. In 2019, lake trout egg deposition was sampled at two locations, Stony Island Reef, and Ford Shoals. No eggs were collected at either site. Egg deposition rates at Stony Island Reef, expressed in eggs/net/day, were lower in 2019 (0) and 2017 (0.0004) than in 1987 and 1989 (1.27 and 0.27, respectively). Spawning lake trout were indexed using standard gillnets set at six locations along the southern shore. Sites were fished overnight with two nets, except Youngstown where only one net was set. When comparing the standard September gillnet survey to the spawning survey, the spawning survey caught more and older fish, but had a similar representation of strains. Both gillnet surveys revealed that, during the early to late fall, most lake trout (>72%) are caught as adults near where they were stocked as juveniles. This spawning survey demonstrated that lake trout in spawning condition are aggregating near possible spawning habitat, but the presence of adults alone cannot identify the specific spawning habitat. Egg deposition results suggest lake trout may be depositing eggs in different habitats then they have in the past. Alternatively, our egg collection methods may not be effective when egg abundance is low. Lake Ontario lake trout restoration would benefit from survey approaches that identify specific spawning habitat.

Lake Ontario↗
USGS2014

Offshore pelagic fish community

Lake Ontario’s offshore zone, as defined by Stewart et al. (2013), comprises all waters of the lake where the bottom depth is greater than 15 m excluding those in embayments. When the lake is thermally stratified during June-October, the offshore pelagic zone includes the upper-warm and middle-cool layers of water which serve as important habitat for Alewife and other prey fishes, and for predators like salmon and trout. Early changes in the fish community of the offshore pelagic zone are well documented elsewhere (e.g., Smith 1972; Christie 1973) as are more recent changes (e.g., Owens et al. 2003; Mills et al. 2003). Currently the offshore fish community consists of a mix of native and non-native species. Native species are those that were present prior to European colonization and for the offshore pelagic zone, include predators like Atlantic Salmon and prey fish like Cisco, Emerald Shiner, and Threespine Stickleback. Non-native species are those that were introduced unintentionally like Alewife and Rainbow Smelt, or that were introduced intentionally like Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, Rainbow Trout, and Brown Trout. Non-native salmon and trout were introduced originally by fisheries managers to provide fishing opportunities and later to reduce an overabundance of Alewife. Alewife is the most abundant prey fish in the offshore pelagic zone and it dominates the diets of native and introduced predators (Brandt 1986; Lantry 2001). Alewife can have direct and indirect negative effects on other fishes through competition for food and/or predation on their larvae (Madenjian et al. 2008). Alewife also contain thiaminase, an enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of thiamine, and fish that eat mainly Alewife can become thiamine deficient which impairs their reproduction (Honeyfield et al. 2005). Except for that of the Alewife, prey fish populations in the offshore pelagic zone are depressed, and not large enough to sustain the zone’s predators. Alewife remain necessary for a functional ecosystem that is required to sustain a highly-valued, trophy sport fishery (Stewart et al. 2013). Wild production of trout and salmon occurs in Lake Ontario tributaries, contributing to in-lake populations (Rand et al. 1993; Connerton et al. 2009; Connerton et al. 2014c). Stocking hatchery-reared fish (Fig. 1), however, remains an essential tool for managing Lake Ontario’s diverse trout and salmon fisheries and achieving the Offshore Pelagic Zone Goal (Stewart et al. 2013): Maintain the offshore pelagic fish community, that is characterized by a diversity of trout and salmon species including Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, and Atlantic Salmon, in balance with prey-fish populations and lower trophic levels. Here we review the fish-community objectives (FCOs) for Lake Ontario’s offshore pelagic zone (Stewart et al. 2013) and evaluate whether those objectives were met during this reporting period (2008-2013) by assessing the status of the objectives’ indicators. We also compare the status of indicators in this reporting period with those in the previous reporting period (2003-2007) (Connerton et al. 2014b). Specific objectives are in italics at the start of each major section and associated indicators of progress are given in Progress and Outlook subsections.

Lake Ontario↗