Martin Danišík | Geology Reports

USGS2026

Utilization of multiple geochronology techniques to constrain the age of laterization and mineralization of the world-class Mount Weld rare earth element deposit, Western Australia

Pervasive chemical weathering on stable cratons may form thick regoliths and elemental enrichment, but constraining the age of regolith formation is challenging. In this study we utilize multiple geochronological techniques on different minerals from the world-class Mount Weld rare earth element (REE) deposit, formed by lateritic weathering of a carbonatite, to constrain the age of formation and provide insight into landscape evolution. The oldest dates, ca. 100 to 38 Ma, are from Lu-Hf dating of churchite [HREE(PO 4 )·2(H 2 O)], a heavy REE phosphate mineral. Growth bands on individual minerals show a younging outwards. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology of cryptomelane [K(Mn 4+ ,Mn 2+ )₈O₁₆] yielded dates from ca. 40 to 27 Ma. Similarly, (U-Th)/He geochronology of goethite [FeO(OH)] yielded dates ranging from ca. 45 to 19 Ma. Integrating results into regional constraints, suggests 1) churchite formed by mineral saturation in a karst-like setting below the water table from ca. 100 to 40 Ma, 2) with minor uplift and erosion, cryptomelane and goethite formed at or near the water table between ca. 45 and 19 Ma, 3) after ca. 15 to 10 Ma chemical weathering within the profile had ended. Other studies document that the region experienced minimal uplift and a wet, warm climate from ca. 100 Ma to 15 Ma. These conditions and the high carbonate content of the carbonatite promote extensive chemical weathering, a deep weathering profile, and the preservation of the weathered section. This study highlights the use of multiple geochronological techniques utilizing different minerals to provide insight into how laterites form and to constrain the timing and history of the formation of this important mineral deposit.

Western Australia↗

USGS2025

Refined chronology of late Quaternary eruptions at Harrat Khaybar, Saudi Arabia, with implications for magma dynamics and regional volcanic history

Determining accurate and precise ages for Quaternary volcanic centers is essential for reconstructing volcanic field histories, understanding magmatic processes, and assessing potential hazards or risk. Harrat Khaybar, western Saudi Arabia, is one of the youngest and potentially most active volcanic fields on the Arabian plate, has been active since ca. 1.7 Ma, and is characterized by a spectrum of rock compositions ranging from predominantly alkalic basalt to trachyte and comendite. Previous work in Harrat Khaybar utilizing 40 Ar/ 39 Ar incremental heating geochronology to constrain morphological preservation and superpositional relationships bracketed the volcanic activity into broad age groups in intervals of ∼150 k.y., and the youngest and most compositionally evolved volcanoes, including Jabal Abyad, Jabal Bayda, and Jabal Qidr, were assigned to the age groups between ca. 300 ka and present. Herein, we establish a detailed chronology of prehistoric silicic and historical basaltic eruptions at central Harrat Khaybar using four independent eruption age determination techniques: zircon double-dating (ZDD), which combines 238 U- 230 Th disequilibrium or U-Pb with (U-Th)/He dating; zircon U-Pb dating; cosmogenic 3 He dating; and cosmogenic 36 Cl geochronology. These were employed to accurately date six volcanic centers, including the comenditic Jabal Abyad, Jabal Bayda, Jabal Ibayl, and Jabal Alhayyirah, the trachytic Jabal Aluthmor, and the basaltic Jabal Qidr. Additionally, our previously published 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages have been recalculated using isochron intercept (nonatmospheric) 40 Ar/ 36 Ar for the trapped Ar component. Our new results reveal that zircon rims from Jabal Abyad and Jabal Bayda define isochron 238 U- 230 Th crystallization ages of 125 ± 4 ka and 144 ± 6 ka, concordant with ZDD eruption ages of 132 ± 4 ka and 149 ± 5 ka, respectively. Zircon U-Pb crystallization and (U-Th)/He eruption ages from Jabal Alhayyirah are concordant at 471 ± 14 ka and 458 ± 18 ka, respectively. Finally, zircons from the nearby Jabal Ibayl yield a U-Pb weighted mean crystallization age of 566 ± 16 ka concordant with the corresponding (U-Th)/He eruption age of 554 ± 12 ka, both of which are notably older than the previously proposed eruption ages of 300−150 ka. Recalculations of published 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages for the youngest volcanoes at central Harrat Khaybar are now in excellent agreement with new geochronological data. Our new age data reveal several new insights into the development of Harrat Khaybar. It is now clear that the comenditic eruptions do not belong to the same eruptive phase and indicate an extended history during which comendites have episodically punctuated the basaltic volcanism since at least 600 ka. The data indicate that Jabal Ibayl and Jabal Alhayyirah represent separate older volcanic events, whereas the younger Jabal Abyad and Jabal Bayda volcanoes appear to be coeval, and their spatial proximity implies that they share a magmatic lineage and maybe a common plumbing system. Zircon age spectra of the comendites reveal obvious xenocrysts and antecrysts indicating assimilation of basement and plutonic progenitors, but otherwise they define broad unimodal populations of crystallization ages that overlap within error with the respective eruption ages. We interpret this to indicate that zircon crystallization continued up to the time of eruption. The cosmogenic ages of Jabal Aluthmor and Jabal Qidr reveal that these centers erupted as recently as ca. 2000 and 760 years ago, respectively. Broadly coeval young silicic and basaltic eruptions at northern Harrat Rahat, the harrat immediately south of Harrat Khaybar, may imply a shared geodynamic forcing between the two adjacent volcanic fields.

Harrat Khaybar↗

USGS2025

Formation of the Mount Weld rare earth deposit, Western Australia: Geochronology constraints

Constraining the age of protracted chemical weathering in stable cratonic areas that may form thick regoliths and the potential enrichment of various elements is challenging. Economic deposits of aluminium, iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, niobium, and rare earth elements (REEs) form in this manner. Determining the age of formation can provide key information for exploration of similar deposits as well as to better constrain paleoclimatic conditions. This study describes our effort to constrain the age of formation of the Mount Weld deposit, a world-class carbonatite-derived REE laterite deposit. We utilize multiple geochronological techniques on different minerals. The oldest dates, ranging from ca. 100 to 50 Ma, were from laser ablation ICPMS, Lu-Hf dating of churchite, a heavy REE phosphate mineral formed by mineral saturation in groundwater. Growth bands on individual minerals show a younging outwards. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology of cryptomelane, a potassium-bearing manganese oxide mineral, yielded ages ranging from ca. 40 to 26 Ma. Similarly, (U–Th)/He geochronology of goethite yielded ages from ca. 45 to 19 Ma.

Mount Weld deposit↗