Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Mark D. Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Mark D. Johnson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Leveraging the double uniparental inheritance of freshwater mussels to detect male spawning activity through eDNA

Sampling aquatic habitats for environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a valuable population monitoring tool, particularly for species that are difficult to survey with conventional methods. However, eDNA approaches are limited in their ability to provide demographic information, resulting in most applications focusing on documenting species presence and distributions. Advancing molecular detection methods to assess reproductive phenology could significantly improve conservation outcomes by informing management efforts. In this study, we leveraged the unique double uniparental mitochondrial inheritance system of one of the most imperiled taxonomic groups, freshwater mussels, to enable detection of reproductive activity. We developed separate qPCR assays for eDNA detection of male mitotypes, found almost exclusively in male gametic tissue, and female mitotypes, found in female gametes and somatic cells of both sexes, of the endangered spectaclecase, Cumberlandia monodonta (Say, 1829). Following assay development and laboratory validation, we verified their utility in situ by detecting male and female mitotypes from captive populations in a controlled mesocosm and from natural populations in streams at sites with known and previously unconfirmed occupancy. Male mitotype eDNA was detected almost exclusively during the March–May spawning window, with concentrations often an order of magnitude higher than female mitotype concentrations. Our findings suggest targeting male mitotype DNA and strategically timing eDNA sampling during spawning periods can improve detection probabilities and aid efforts to conserve at-risk freshwater mussels.

Missouri↗

The MIEM guidelines: Minimum information for reporting of environmental metabarcoding data

Environmental DNA ( eDNA ) and RNA ( eRNA ) metabarcoding has become a popular tool for assessing biodiversity from environmental samples, but inconsistent documentation of methods, data and metadata makes results difficult to reproduce and synthesise. A working group of scientists have collaborated to produce a set of minimum reporting guidelines for the constituent steps of metabarcoding workflows, from the physical layout of laboratories through to data archiving. We emphasise how reporting the suite of data and metadata should adhere to findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible ( FAIR ) data standards, thereby providing context for evaluating and understanding study results. An overview of the documentation considerations for each workflow step is presented and then summarised in a checklist that can accompany a published study or report. Ensuring workflows are transparent and documented is critical to reproducible research and should allow for more efficient uptake of metabarcoding data into management decision-making.

Metabarcoding and Metagenomics↗