Marissa Kaminski | Geology Reports

USGS2026

Detecting bumble bees in the wild using environmental DNA: Development and validation of a qPCR assay for the endangered Franklin’s bumble bee (Bombus franklini)

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a noninvasive alternative to conventional methods of surveying insects that may be particularly useful for detecting pollinators. We developed a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay to detect the DNA of Franklin’s bumble bee ( Bombus franklini ) from flower samples and conducted an initial test of the assay using samples collected within and around the historical range of the species. We further analyzed all samples using metabarcoding. Our qPCR assay successfully amplified B. franklini DNA and exhibited no cross-reactivity with nontarget bumble bee DNA during in silico and in vitro testing. We did not detect B. franklini DNA from field-collected flower samples using either qPCR or metabarcoding. However, metabarcoding analysis revealed DNA of at least 16 other bumble bee species. This finding underscores the potential utility of eDNA sampling for surveying bumble bees. Nondetection of B. franklini from field-collected flower samples may be due to the extreme rarity of the species; B. franklini is endangered and has not been observed in the wild since 2006. Our B. franklini assay is among the first bee-specific qPCR assays ever developed and provides proof of concept for additional assays that may improve detection rates of rare and endangered bees.

California, Oregon↗

USGS2023

Dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration capture of environmental DNA for freshwater mussel (Unionidae) species detection with metabarcoding

Insufficient water sample volumes can be a limiting factor for detecting species with environmental DNA (eDNA) from aquatic habitats. We compared detections of freshwater mussel (Unionidae) communities using large water sample volumes and dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF or DEUF) with traditional eDNA filtration methods that use relatively small water sample volumes. Unionid species were detected in approximately 50-L D-HFUF eDNA samples with two mitochondrial DNA metabarcoding markers (COI and ND1) and compared to species detection results from eDNA captured from commonly used 1-L samples filtered with polyethersulfone (PES) filters at three lotic sites in Georgia and Missouri. Of the 431,560 COI and 1,035,472 ND1 reads from all environmental samples of both filter types that passed quality control, 95% (410,755 reads) of COI reads and 85% (883,472 reads) of ND1 reads were assigned to a unionid species. Nineteen different freshwater mussel species were detected across all D-HFUF samples, and 11 species were detected across all PES samples. Reads assigned to the genus Elliptio could not be resolved beyond the genus level with either marker. From D-HFUF samples, 15 and 16 mussel species were detected with the COI and ND1 markers, respectively. From PES samples, nine and seven species were detected with the COI and ND1 markers, respectively. More mussel species were detected at each site in D-HFUF samples than in PES samples regardless of whether results from both markers were combined or evaluated separately. Our results demonstrate the merit of further exploration and optimization of D-HFUF for capturing eDNA from high-volume water samples to facilitate detection of unionids and likely other aquatic organisms.

Environmental DNA↗