Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Lesley K. Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Lesley K. Smith.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA

Denitrification is an important net sink for NO 3 − in streams, but direct measurements are limited and in situ controlling factors are not well known. We measured denitrification at multiple scales over a range of flow conditions and NO 3 − concentrations in streams draining agricultural land in the upper Mississippi River basin. Comparisons of reach-scale measurements (in-stream mass transport and tracer tests) with local-scale in situ measurements (pore-water profiles, benthic chambers) and laboratory data (sediment core microcosms) gave evidence for heterogeneity in factors affecting benthic denitrification both temporally (e.g., seasonal variation in NO 3 − concentrations and loads, flood-related disruption and re-growth of benthic communities and organic deposits) and spatially (e.g., local stream morphology and sediment characteristics). When expressed as vertical denitrification flux per unit area of streambed ( U denit , in μmol N m −2 h −1 ), results of different methods for a given set of conditions commonly were in agreement within a factor of 2–3. At approximately constant temperature (~20 ± 4°C) and with minimal benthic disturbance, our aggregated data indicated an overall positive relation between U denit (~0–4,000 μmol N m −2 h −1 ) and stream NO 3 − concentration (~20–1,100 μmol L −1 ) representing seasonal variation from spring high flow (high NO 3 − ) to late summer low flow (low NO 3 − ). The temporal dependence of U denit on NO 3 − was less than first-order and could be described about equally well with power-law or saturation equations (e.g., for the unweighted dataset, U denit ≈26 * [NO 3 − ] 0.44 or U denit ≈640 * [NO 3 − ]/[180 + NO 3 − ]; for a partially weighted dataset, U denit ≈14 * [NO 3 − ] 0.54 or U denit ≈700 * [NO 3 − ]/[320 + NO 3 − ]). Similar parameters were derived from a recent spatial comparison of stream denitrification extending to lower NO 3 − concentrations (LINX2), and from the combined dataset from both studies over 3 orders of magnitude in NO 3 − concentration. Hypothetical models based on our results illustrate: (1) U denit was inversely related to denitrification rate constant ( k 1 denit , in day −1 ) and vertical transfer velocity ( v f,denit , in m day −1 ) at seasonal and possibly event time scales; (2) although k 1 denit was relatively large at low flow (low NO 3 − ), its impact on annual loads was relatively small because higher concentrations and loads at high flow were not fully compensated by increases in U denit ; and (3) although NO 3 − assimilation and denitrification were linked through production of organic reactants, rates of NO 3 − loss by these processes may have been partially decoupled by changes in flow and sediment transport. Whereas k 1 denit and v f,denit are linked implicitly with stream depth, NO 3 − concentration, and(or) NO 3 − load, estimates of U denit may be related more directly to field factors (including NO 3 − concentration) affecting denitrification rates in benthic sediments. Regional regressions and simulations of benthic denitrification in stream networks might be improved by including a non-linear relation between U denit and stream NO 3 − concentration and accounting for temporal variation.

Biogeochemistry↗

Denitrification in nitrate-rich streams: Application of N2:Ar and 15N-tracer methods in intact cores

Rates of benthic denitrification were measured using two techniques, membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), applied to sediment cores from two NO 3 − ‐rich streams draining agricultural land in the upper Mississippi River Basin. Denitrification was estimated simultaneously from measurements of N 2 :Ar (MIMS) and 15 N[N 2 ] (IRMS) after the addition of low‐level 15 NO 3 − tracer ( 15 N:N = 0.03–0.08) in stream water overlying intact sediment cores. Denitrification rates ranged from about 0 to 4400 μmol N·m −2 ·h −1 in Sugar Creek and from 0 to 1300 μmol N·m −2 ·h −1 in Iroquois River, the latter of which possesses greater streamflow discharge and a more homogeneous streambed and water column. Within the uncertainties of the two techniques, there is good agreement between the MIMS and IRMS results, which indicates that the production of N 2 by the coupled process of nitrification/denitrification was relatively unimportant and surface‐water NO 3 − was the dominant source of NO 3 − for benthic denitrification in these streams. Variation in stream NO 3 − concentration (from about 20 μmol/L during low discharge to 1000 μmol/L during high discharge) was a significant control of benthic denitrification rates, judging from the more abundant MIMS data. The interpretation that NO 3 − concentration directly affects denitrification rate was corroborated by increased rates of denitrification in cores amended with NO 3 − . Denitrification in Sugar Creek removed ≤11% per day of the in‐stream NO 3 − in late spring and removed roughly 15–20% in late summer. The fraction of NO 3 − removed in Iroquois River was less than that of Sugar Creek. Although benthic denitrification rates were relatively high during periods of high stream flow, when NO 3 concentrations were also high, the increase in benthic denitrification could not compensate for the much larger increase in stream NO 3 − fluxes during high flow. Consequently, fractional NO 3 − losses were relatively low during high flow.

Ecological Applications↗

Investigation of denitrification rates in an ammonia-dominated constructed wastewater treatment wetland

Denitrification measurements were made under simulated field conditions using sediment cores and water collected from the Hemet/San Jacinto Multipurpose Demonstration Wetland (Riverside County, California, USA). The 9.9 ha constructed wetland is used to both polish ammonia-dominated secondary municipal effluent and provide migratory bird habitat. The wetland was originally constructed as a marsh-pond-marsh system in 1994. Over the period from January through March 1998, measured denitrification rates averaged 20.9 ± 20.9 μmol N m −2 h −1 within the emergent marsh portions of the wetland and 646 ± 353 μmol N m −2 h −1 in open water areas. The mean areal denitrification removal rate for this period was 0.70 kg N ha −1 d −1 , which accounted for about 8% of the total N removed by the wetland. Internal retention was the main N-removal mechanism. Synoptic water quality surveys indicated that denitrification was limited by a lack of nitrification within the wetland. Between April 1998 and January 1999, the wetland was reconfigured as a hemi-marsh system, having equal areas of interspersed emergent marsh and deep open water. In May 1999, measured denitrification rates averaged 1414 ± 298 μmol N m −2 h −1 within the emergent marsh zones and 682 ± 218 μmol N m −2 h −1 in the open water areas. The mean areal denitrification removal rate was 3.58 kg N ha −1 d −1 , which accounted for 40% of the total N removed by the wetland. A synoptic water quality survey indicated that nitrification within the wetland had been enhanced by the reduction of emergent macrophyte biomass and the increase in the area of interspersed deep open water. The modifications to the wetland shifted the nitrogen balance from a large internal storage component and a small denitrification component in 1998 to a more denitrifying system in 1999.

Wetlands↗

Landscape patterns of CH4 fluxes in an alpine tundra ecosystem

We measured CH4 fluxes from three major plant communities characteristic of alpine tundra in the Colorado Front Range. Plant communities in this ecosystem are determined by soil moisture regimes induced by winter snowpack distribution. Spatial patterns of CH4 flux during the snow-free season corresponded roughly with these plant communities. In Carex-dominated meadows, which receive the most moisture from snowmelt, net CH4 production occurred. However, CH4 production in one Carex site (seasonal mean = +8.45 mg CH4 m-2 d-1) was significantly larger than in the other Carex sites (seasonal means = -0.06 and +0.05 mg CH4 m-2 d-1). This high CH4 flux may have resulted from shallower snowpack during the winter. In Acomastylis meadows, which have an intermediate moisture regime, CH4 oxidation dominated (seasonal mean = -0.43 mg CH4 m-2 d-1). In the windswept Kobresia meadow plant community, which receive the least amount of moisture from snowmelt, only CH4 oxidation was observed (seasonal mean = -0.77 mg CH4 m-2 d-1). Methane fluxes correlated with a different set of environmental factors within each plant community. In the Carex plant community, CH4 emission was limited by soil temperature. In the Acomastylis meadows, CH4 oxidation rates correlated positively with soil temperature and negatively with soil moisture. In the Kobresia community, CH4 oxidation was stimulated by precipitation. Thus, both snow-free season CH4 fluxes and the controls on those CH4 fluxes were related to the plant communities determined by winter snowpack.

Biogeochemistry↗