Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Kouki Kitajima

Publications and source records attributed to Kouki Kitajima.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Recycling radiogenic osmium by crustal foundering in subduction zones: Evidence from pyroxenite xenoliths in the north Andean arc

Removal of mafic-ultramafic lower crust (e.g., via delamination) is fundamental to making andesitic continental crust, yet direct evidence of this process remains elusive. A unique suite of garnet clinopyroxenite and hornblendite (arclogite) xenoliths from the northern volcanic zone of the Andes, erupted to the surface in the mid-Pleistocene, have bulk-rock geochemistry and osmium (Os) isotopic compositions that demonstrate their crustal affinity, yet have equilibration pressures and temperatures below the arc Mohorovičić discontinuity (~53 km) and some as deep as within the sub-arc mantle wedge (~105 km). Garnet websterites from the same xenolith suite, sourced from depths approaching the Wadati-Benioff zone (~140 km), have elemental and isotopic compositions indicative of a mantle origin, likely formed as products of peridotite-liquid reactions above the subducting slab. Variability in bulk-rock 143 Nd/ 144 Nd values and garnet oxygen isotope ratios ( 𝛿 18 O) for these samples is attributed to minor assimilation of subducted components and/or older crustal material, but assimilation alone cannot account for the highly radiogenic Os isotopic compositions. These results provide direct petrologic evidence for modern arclogite formation and foundering in the Andean orogen, the archetypal active continental subduction system. Elevated 187 Os/ 188 Os values of Mercaderes arclogites imply that recycling of gravitationally unstable arc cumulates during continental crust formation introduces highly radiogenic Os into the convective mantle, which has implications for mass fluxes across the crust-mantle boundary as well as the sources and evolution of mantle heterogeneity as seen in orogenic peridotite massifs and in the sources of oceanic basalts

Earth and Planetary Science Letters↗

Comparison of δ13C analyses of individual foraminifer (Orbulina universa) shells by secondary ion mass spectrometry and gas source mass spectrometry

Rationale: The use of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to perform micrometer-scale in situ carbon isotope (δ 13 C) analyses of shells of marine microfossils called planktic foraminifers holds promise to explore calcification and ecological processes. The potential of this technique, however, cannot be realized without comparison to traditional whole-shell δ 13 C values measured by gas source mass spectrometry (GSMS). Methods: Paired SIMS and GSMS δ 13 C values measured from final chamber fragments of the same shell of the planktic foraminifer Orbulina universa are compared. The SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C differences (Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS ) were determined via paired analysis of hydrogen peroxide-cleaned fragments of modern cultured specimens and of fossil specimens from deep-sea sediments that were either untreated, sonicated, and cleaned with hydrogen peroxide or vacuum roasted. After treatment, fragments were analyzed by a CAMECA IMS 1280 SIMS instrument and either a ThermoScientific MAT-253 or a Fisons Optima isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GSMS). Results: Paired analyses of cleaned fragments of cultured specimens ( n = 7) yield no SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C difference. However, paired analyses of untreated ( n = 18) and cleaned ( n = 12) fragments of fossil shells yield average Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values of 0.8‰ and 0.6‰ (±0.2‰, 2 SE), respectively, while vacuum roasting of fossil shell fragments ( n = 11) removes the SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C difference. Conclusions: The noted Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values are most likely due to matrix effects causing sample–standard mismatch for SIMS analyses but may also be a combination of other factors such as SIMS measurement of chemically bound water. The volume of material analyzed via SIMS is ~10 5 times smaller than that analyzed by GSMS; hence, the extent to which these Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values represent differences in analyte or instrument factors remains unclear.

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry↗