Geology topics

Jared Thomas Myers

Publications and source records attributed to Jared Thomas Myers.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Status and trends in the Lake Superior fish community, 2025

The U.S. Geological Survey has conducted annual trawl surveys across Lake Superior since 1978 that describe trends in fish species occurrence and relative abundance to support fisheries science and management. In 2025, the Lake Superior fish community was sampled with daytime bottom and surface trawls at 72 nearshore stations in May and June and 36 offshore locations in July. Nearshore bottom trawls collected 63,005 fish represented by 30 species or morphotypes. The number of species collected at each location ranged from 1 to 13, with a median of 7.0 species. Estimated fish biomass density at individual stations ranged from <0.1 to 125.7 kg per ha with a lakewide mean of 7.6 kg per ha. Offshore bottom trawls collected 30,342 fish represented by 13 species or morphotypes. Estimated fish biomass density at individual stations ranged from 1.6 to 34.7 kg per ha with a lakewide mean of 9.1 kg per ha, which was the highest since the offshore survey began in 2011. Lakewide average numerical densities (fish per ha) of age-1 fish were 0.67 per ha for Bloater, 0.01 per ha for Cisco, 1.15 per ha for Kiyi, 0.95 per ha for Lake Whitefish, and 336.33 per ha for Rainbow Smelt. Surface trawling collected 1,562 larval Coregonus individuals which was the fewest Coregonus larvae collected in a whole lake survey since the larval fish survey began in 2014. Nearshore mean larval Coregonus numerical densities were 156 fish per ha in May and June 2025 and 21 fish per ha in July 2025. May mean surface water temperatures (6.1°C) were near the warmest for the period-of-record, while June (6.8°C) and July (10.0°C) were near average or below.

Lake Superior↗

USGS2025

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for monitoring fish biodiversity in remote lakes

Objective Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding provides an attractive option for monitoring biodiversity in remote freshwater ecosystems, where the deployment of conventional gears encounters major logistical constraints. We evaluated eDNA metabarcoding for monitoring fish communities and early detection of nonnative species in three remote lakes on Isle Royale, Michigan, USA. Methods At each of the three lakes, we collected surface, midwater, and lake bottom samples from 10 sites during spring and fall sampling events. We performed metabarcoding on all the water samples, targeting the 12S region of all fish species. Results Despite a relatively small sample size ( N = 60 samples per lake across two visits; 10 locations with three depths per location), we recovered 70% of all the species that were previously observed using conventional methods. We recovered several detections of putative Cisco Coregonus artedi , a vulnerable coldwater species, providing evidence that Cisco have persisted in these lakes. However, we found disentangling likely false positives from rare species challenging, which we overcame by employing multiple types of detection thresholds and a species-specific quantitative PCR assay. Conclusions Although we were able to successfully characterize the fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding, more attention needs to be given to the detection thresholds and communication protocols that provide guidance in interpretating new eDNA detections and using eDNA detections to inform management decisions. Although eDNA metabarcoding has limitations that should be accounted for at the outset of the project, the ease of sample collection makes eDNA metabarcoding an option for monitoring freshwater biodiversity in remote systems.

Michigan↗

USGS2025

Fish composition in a complex freshwater estuary: Environmental DNA metabarcoding versus capture surveys

Objective The potential for environmental DNA (eDNA) to disperse widely from source organisms enables high detection efficiency but raises questions about eDNA's ability to differentiate fine-scale spatial patterns relative to conventional fish capture data. Methods We evaluate these questions in the St. Louis River estuary—a hydrologically and spatially complex coastal system within Lake Superior that supports a diverse assemblage of resident and migratory fish species—via comparison of eDNA metabarcoding (12S and 16S loci) to multigear capture survey data from 2 years and two seasons. Results The eDNA and capture surveys collectively yielded 68 fish species: 2 species detected only by capture, 27 detected only by eDNA, and 39 shared across both survey types but having generally higher occurrence frequencies with eDNA than capture. Six species detected only by eDNA were unexpected, having no prior records in the Lake Superior basin. Data from paired eDNA and capture stations showed little relationship between the two survey types, with capture yielding species at stations that eDNA did not, eDNA detecting species in different habitats and distant locations from any captures, and assemblage patterns homogenized in eDNA surveys relative to capture surveys. Conclusions Our study finds that eDNA is a sensitive tool for assessing species presence at the system scale but that capture surveys may better yield the fine-scale spatial distribution information of interest to fisheries and habitat managers, especially in spatially and hydrologically complex systems.

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society↗