Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

James K. Otton

Publications and source records attributed to James K. Otton.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A Geochemical Trophic Cascade in Yellowstone's Geothermal Environments

We contrast the geochemistry of the Madison drainage, which has high concentrations of geothermal features, with the Lamar drainage of Yellowstone National Park, USA, and trace the consequences of geochemical differences through abiotic and biotic linkages in the ecosystem. Waters in the geothermal-dominated drainage contained anomalously high levels of fluoride (F) and silica (SiO 2 ). Soils, stream sediments, and surface waters that interact or mix with geothermal waters, in turn, had elevated F and SiO 2 concentrations compared to similar samples from the Lamar drainage. The geochemical differences were reflected in the chemistry of forage plants, with some plants from geothermally influenced areas containing four- to eightfold higher concentrations of F and SiO 2 than similar plants in the Lamar drainage. Geothermal heat reduced snowpack, and we found that elk (Cervus elaphus) concentrated in these refugia as snowpack increased each winter. The consequent high dietary intake of F in animals associated with the geothermal areas was confirmed by the finding that bone samples from elk living in the Madison drainage contained sixfold higher concentrations of F than samples collected from animals wintering in the Lamar drainage. High F exposure resulted in compromised dentition due to fluoride toxicosis, which was undoubtedly exacerbated by the abrasive action of silica. The consequent accelerated and aberrant tooth wear resulted in early onset of senescence, reduced life span, and an abbreviated age structure. We speculate that these altered demographics, combined with spatial heterogeneity of snowpack, will result in increased vulnerability of this large herbivore population to wolf predation and less resiliency to compensate demographically for predation.

Wyoming↗

Produced water and hydrocarbon releases at the Osage-Skiatook petroleum environmental research sites, Osage County, Oklahoma: Introduction and geologic setting

In February 2001, the USGS started studies of the impacts of produced water and hydrocarbon releases at 2 research sites adjacent to Skiatook Lake in southeastern Osage County near Tulsa, Oklahoma. Both sites are in a dissected area of modest relief underlain by interbedded shale, siltstone, and sandstone. Thicker resistant sandstone units typically form the hill crests. Hillslopes are underlain by shale, siltstone, and thin sandstone beds. Core drilling during February and March of 2002 indicates that the depth of weathering of the bedrock is about 10-25 m on the ridges and 5-6 m in small stream valleys. These sites are located in the Cross Timbers ecosystem area of northeastern Oklahoma. Oak forests cover the hillslopes. Grassslands occur on most ridge crests. Site "A" is an area where produced water and hydrocarbon releases occurred primarily 60-85 years ago. The site is located in section 13, T22N, R10E. The entire site is underlain by 1) a surface layer of eolian sand of varying thickness (maximum observed about 80 cm); 2) colluvium that ranges from large boulders of sandstone to thin, granule-pebble conglomerate; 3) weathered shale, siltstone, and sandstone; and 4) underlying unweathered bedrock. Much of the site appears to have been impacted by early salt-water releases that killed the oak forest, however a few oak trees persist as single trees or clumps of trees within the original kill area. The gently sloping upper part of the site is slightly eroded in places and has been mostly revegetated with grasses, forbs, sumac, and a few trees. The lower, steeper, more heavily salt-impacted portion has been eroded to depths of as much as 2 m. This area drains into the Cedar Creek arm of Skiatook Lake. Oil from two redwood tanks at the top of the site was transported via ditch to two roadside pits at mid-site. Oil spills from pipeline breaks and tank batteries (no longer present) are scattered around the site. Most of the oil is highly weathered however, one pit contains what appears to be relatively fresh asphaltic tank bottom material. Site "B" is located in sections 29 and 32, T22N, R10E. It includes an active production tank battery and adjacent large pit, two injection well sites, one with an adjacent small pit, and an old tank battery. All of these sites are within 45 m of the shoreline of the lake (at normal pool elevation). The pit associated with the active tank battery is within 15 m of the lake. Two small creeks cross the northern and southern parts of the site. The upper part of the site is characterized by a thin surface layer of eolian sand mixed with sandstone-clast colluvium underlain by weathered and unweathered shale whereas the lower part of the site is underlain by 1) a surface layer of eolian sand (20-70 cm thick); 2) colluvial apron and alluvial deposits of varying thickness comprised of sandstone pebbles, cobbles, and boulders with a fine sand matrix; 3) weathered shale; and 4) unweathered bedrock. Three salt scars extend downslope from the active tank battery, the injection well/pit, and the old tank battery to the lake edge. The area underlain by shallow saline ground water is substantially larger than the salt-scarred areas. Dissolved hydrocarbons can be detected in the shallow ground water below the active pit.

Oklahoma↗

Use of soil leachates to define the extent of brine-contaminated soils at the USGS petroleum environmental research site "B", Osage County, northeastern Oklahoma

Soils at an active oil production site with a history of surface releases of produced water were investigated to determine the chemical signature of salt contamination and the spatial distribution of soil salinity in relation to areas of obvious salt scarring. Grab samples of shallow soil (0-15 cm) and selected soil profiles to depths of 0.6 to 1.7 m were collected onsite and offsite using a 5-cm diameter stainless steel soil auger. Air dried and disaggregated soil from 15 cm intervals (100 g) was mixed with 100 ml of distilled-deionized water to dissolve readily soluble salts. After 24 hours the water was separated by centrifugation followed by filtration through a 0.45 micrometer membrane. Specific conductance was measured immediately. Dissolved chloride (Cl) and sulfate (SO4) were initially estimated with Cl titration strips and turbidimetric measurements respectively. More accurate measurements of dissolved Cl, SO4, and bromide (Br) were later performed by ion chromatography. Brine-contaminated soil was indicated by (1) unusually elevated Cl concentrations or relatively low ratios of conductance/Cl in aqueous leachates compared to leachates of uncontaminated soils, and (2) ratios of Cl/Br in leachates (250± 30) that fall within the range of Cl/Br ratios measured in local produced waters (220-320). Leachates of background soils from the area were characterized by low conductance (sandy soils) or dissolved solids dominated by sulfates (shaley soils). At the study site, the surface (0-15 cm) distribution of elevated soil salinity was largely confined to areas of obvious salt scarring. Within the area of salt scars, elevated salinity persisted to depths of refusal by manual augering. The technique will be applied to deeper samples obtained by mechanical augering or direct push techniques.

Oklahoma↗

Preliminary geophysical characterization of two oil production sites, Osage County, Oklahoma - Osage Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Project

Ground electromagnetic and dc resistivity geophysical surveys were used to interpret the subsurface distribution of salinized soil, water, and bedrock at two sites (A and B) and to characterize the larger scale hydrologic setting. Measurements were made on grids of about 1000 square meters using a very shallow penetrating (less than 10 m) electromagnetic (EM) geophysical system (EM31). At site A, high subsurface conductivities (more than 100 millisiemens per meter) found below disposal ponds extended down the local hydrologic gradient to below the normal level of near by Lake Skiatook. At site B, areas of highest subsurface electrical conductivity were offset about 10 m from the center of salt scars. The area of high subsurface electrical conductivity extends in the subsurface below the normal level of Skiatook Lake. DC resistivity soundings were made in and around the two sites in order to characterize deeper (30-60 m) electrical properties of the subsurface lithology and ground water. These soundings indicate that the tight shale that dominates the local lithology is moderately electrically conductive (5 milliseimems per meter). DC soundings done in several areas at the Skiatook Lake shoreline indicate an electrically conductive (less than 10 millisiemens per meter) zone exists below the shore even away from the oil production sites. This conductive zone may indicate a mixing between fresh lake water and local ground water that has high dissolved solids. Borehole geophysical logs at site B and laboratory rock property measurements are currently being used to refine interpretation of ground geophysical measurements.

Oklahoma↗

Characterization of soils and rock at an active oil production site: Effects of brine and hydrocarbon contamination

An active oil production site (Osage-Skiatook petroleum environmental research Site B) in Osage County, Oklahoma is under study to determine the impacts on soils and rock of brine and hydrocarbon spills. The goals of the soil and rock characterization are to 1) document and identify the type, degree, and areal extent of brine and hydrocarbon releases, 2) understand controls on the movement and retention of brine and hydrocarbons, and 3) determine the role of solid phases, such as clay and iron-bearing minerals, in natural mitigation. The types and amounts of clay minerals and oxidizers (particularly iron) are important because of the capacity of clay minerals to exchange cations that are dissolved in brines and the capacity of reactive ferric iron species to oxidize hydrocarbons. Characterization of soils and rock includes visual and microscopic description, X-ray diffraction of bulk and clay fraction samples, separation of size fractions, determination of cation exchange capacity, bulk chemical composition, and selective extraction of iron species. Results suggest that much of the brine and hydrocarbon contamination occurs in the shallow subsurface (< 240 cm) where the soil profile varies from dark brown topsoil to reddish orange sand to greenish-gray clay. A layer of iron-stained colluvium that is present in the shallow subsurface consists of pebbles and coarse sand and forms an important conduit for fluid movement. Unusually high percentages (as much as 97 % of total iron) of reduced iron may record the passage of hydrocarbon-rich ground water. Clay minerals are abundant in some samples and are dominated by kaolinite, mixed layer illite-smectite, and smectite. The correlation of grain size and clay mineral content with soil leachate results will be discussed and high percentages of sodium on exchange sites in clay are expected in areas of past spills of produced water.

Oklahoma↗

Simple Techniques For Assessing Impacts Of Oil And Gas Operations On Public Lands: A Field Evaluation Of A Photoionization Detector (PID) At A Condensate Release Site, Padre Island National Seashore, Texas

Simple, cost-effective techniques are needed for land managers to assess the environmental impacts of oil and gas production activities on public lands, so that sites may be prioritized for remediation or for further, more formal assessment. Field-portable instruments provide real-time data and allow the field investigator to extend an assessment beyond simply locating and mapping obvious disturbances. Field investigators can examine sites for the presence of hydrocarbons in the subsurface using a soil auger and a photoionization detector (PID). The PID measures volatile organic compounds (VOC) in soil gases. This allows detection of hydrocarbons in the shallow subsurface near areas of obvious oil-stained soils, oil in pits, or dead vegetation. Remnants of a condensate release occur in sandy soils at a production site on the Padre Island National Seashore in south Texas. Dead vegetation had been observed by National Park Service personnel in the release area several years prior to our visit. The site is located several miles south of the Malaquite Beach Campground. In early 2001, we sampled soil gases for VOCs in the area believed to have received the condensate. Our purpose in this investigation was: 1) to establish what sampling techniques might be effective in sandy soils with a shallow water and contrast them with techniques used in an earlier study; and 2) delineate the probable area of condensate release. Our field results show that sealing the auger hole with a clear, rigid plastic tube capped at the top end and sampling the soil gas through a small hole in the cap increases the soil VOC gas signature, compared to sampling soil gases in the bottom of an open hole. This sealed-tube sampling method increases the contrast between the VOC levels within a contaminated area and adjacent background areas. The tube allows the PID air pump to draw soil gas from the volume of soil surrounding the open hole below the tube in a zone less influenced by atmospheric air. In an open hole, the VOC readings seem to be strongly dependent on the degree of diffusion and advection of soil gas VOCs into the open hole from the surrounding soil, a process that may vary with soil and wind conditions. Making measurements with the sealed hole does take some additional time (4-7 minutes after the hole is augered) compared to the open-hole technique (1-2 minutes). We used the rigid-plastic tube technique to survey for soil gas VOCs across the entire site, less than ? acre. Condensate has impacted at least 0.28 acres. The impacted area may extend northwest of the surveyed area.

Open-File Report↗

Simple Techniques For Assessing Impacts Of Oil And Gas Operations On Federal Lands - A Field Evaluation At Big South Fork National River And Recreation Area, Scott County, Tennessee

Simple, cost-effective techniques are needed for land managers to assess the environmental impacts of oil and gas production activities on public lands so that sites may be prioritized for further, more formal assessment or remediation. These techniques should allow the field investigator to extend the assessment beyond the surface disturbances documented by simple observation and mapping using field-portable instruments and expendable materials that provide real-time data. The principal contaminants of current concern are hydrocarbons, produced water, and naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). Field investigators can examine sites for the impacts of hydrocarbon releases using a photoionization detector (PID) and a soil auger. Volatile organic carbon (VOC) in soil gases in an open auger hole or in the head space of a bagged and gently warmed auger soil sample can be measured by the PID. This allows detection of hydrocarbon movement in the shallow subsurface away from areas of obvious oil-stained soils or oil in pits at a production site. Similarly, a field conductivity meter and chloride titration strips can be used to measure salts in water and soil samples at distances well beyond areas of surface salt scarring. Use of a soil auger allows detection of saline subsoils in areas where salts may be flushed from the surface soil layers. Finally, a microRmeter detects the presence of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in equipment and soils. NORM often goes undetected at many sites although regulations limiting NORM in equipment and soils are being promulgated in several States and are being considered by the USEPA. With each technique, background sampling should be done for comparison with impacted areas. The authors examined sites in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area in November of 1999. A pit at one site at the edge of the flood plain of a small stream had received crude oil releases from a nearby tank. Auger holes down gradient from the pit showed the presence of anomalous concentrations of VOCs at depths of 3 feet for a distance of about 50 feet. PID readings at other sites showed 1) one reclaimed site where hydrocarbon biodegradation was incomplete; 2) one reclaimed site where biodegradation had left no traces of VOCS; and 3) two sites where traces of substantial offsite migration of hydrocarbons occurred. Produced water salts at one site have migrated many 100s of feet downvalley from the area of salt scarring and tree death adjacent to the pits. Naturally occurring radioactivity (NORM) at most sites was at background. One site showed anomalous radioactivity related to NORM in a small brine pit. Some of this NORM has moved downslope from the outlet pipe to the pit.

Open-File Report↗

Effects of produced waters at oilfield production sites on the Osage Indian Reservation, northeastern Oklahoma

The authors conducted limited site surveys in the Wildhorse and Burbank oilfields on the Osage Indian Reservation, northeastern Oklahoma. The purpose was to document salt scarring, erosion, and soil and water salinization, to survey for radioactivity in oilfield equipment, and to determine if trace elements and naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) were present in soils affected by oilfield solid waste and produced waters. These surveys were also designed to see if field gamma spectrometry and field soil conductivity measurements were useful in screening for NORM contamination and soil salinity at these sites. Visits to oilfield production sites in the Wildhorse field in June of 1995 and 1996 confirmed the presence of substantial salt scarring, soil salinization, and slight to locally severe erosion. Levels of radioactivity on some oil field equipment, soils, and road surfaces exceed proposed state standards. Radium activities in soils affected by tank sludge and produced waters also locally exceed proposed state standards. Laboratory analyses of samples from two sites show moderate levels of copper, lead, and zinc in brine-affected soils and pipe scale. Several sites showed detectable levels of bromine and iodine, suggesting that these trace elements may be present in sufficient quantity to inhibit plant growth. Surface waters in streams at two sampled sites exceed total dissolved solid limits for drinking waters. At one site in the Wildhorse field, an EM survey showed that saline soils in the upper 6m extend from a surface salt scar downvalley about 150 m. (Photo [95k]: Dead oak trees and partly revegetated salt scar at Site OS95-2 in the Wildhorse field, Osage County, Oklahoma.) In the Burbank field, limited salt scarring and slight erosion occurs in soils at some sites and low to moderate levels of radioactivity were observed in oil field equipment at some sites. The levels of radioactivity and radium observed in some soils and equipment at these sites are above levels of concern as defined in regulations proposed by the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. The volumes of material involved appear to be relatively small for most sites. The lead levels observed in soils affected by tank sludge wastes are about one half of the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) interim remedial action levels used for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) sites (400 ppm). Field gamma spectrometry proved useful in delineating areas where radium has been added to the natural soil by oilfield solid waste and produced water, although the technique does not meet standards of assessment used in the state of Louisiana which require core sampling of 15 cm intervals and radiochemical analysis in the laboratory. Further work is needed to develop field gamma spectrometry as a substitute for the more expensive coring and laboratory analysis. The ratio of radium-228 to radium-226 may hold promise in evaluating the relative ages of NORM contamination at a site.

Oklahoma↗

Mountain wetlands: Efficient uranium filters — Potential impacts

Wetlands are common in montane and subalpine settings in the Rocky Mountains, Sierra Nevada, and other mountainous regions of the western U.S. Because they are efficient filters, many contain anomalous concentrations of uranium and other metals. Sorption by organic matter, complexing of the uranyl ion, (UO 2 ) 2+, with humic and fulvic acids, and action by bacteria has produced geochemical enrichment factors greater than 10000 to 1 between peat and uranium-bearing waters. Sediments in 67 of 145 Colorado wetlands sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey contain moderate (20 ppm) or greater concentrations of uranium (some as high as 3 000 ppm) based on dry weight. The proposed maximum contaminant level (MCL) for uranium in drinking water is 20 μg/1 or 20 ppb. By comparison, sediments in many of these wetlands contain 3 to 5 orders of magnitude more uranium than the proposed MCL. Wetlands near the workings of old mines (widespread in Colorado and other areas) may be trapping any number of additional metals/elements including Cu, Pb, Zn, As and Ag. Anthropogenic disturbances and natural changes may release uranium and other loosely bound metals presently contained in wetland sediments. Draining of wetlands with resulting oxidation of organic-rich sediments, acidification, and other environmental and geochemical changes may free relatively high concentrations of metals that have accumulated for thousands of years in the organic-rich sediments. Destruction of wetlands eliminates the natural filtration function which serves to protect water quality.

Ecological Engineering↗

Understanding our fragile environment; Lessons from geochemical studies

An understanding of our fragile environment can begin with a recognition of the importance of certain elements, commonly called "minerals substances" (such as iron and zinc), in the lives of humans and animals and in the soils that support plants. This recognition is well deserved because these elements are essential for the life or optimum health of an organism. Some elements such as carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus are required in relatively large amounts by organisms. However, others are required in smaller quantities; these are referred to as trace elements. Diseases have been related to the deficiency of about 20 elements in animals and humans and to the deficiency of approximately 13 elements in plants. At the same time, if these and other elements occur in quantities great enough, toxicity can result. An element, or any substance, that occurs in the environment and contains concentrations above what are considered to be background levels may be considered a contaminant. When contaminants occur at levels that are potentially harmful to organisms, they are labeled as hazards. Often the quantitative difference between essential amounts and toxic concentrations of these elements is very small. For example, the trace element selenium is required at a level of no less than 0.4 ppm in the diet of cattle but can be toxic at levels greater than approximately 4ppm. Elements that are required for survival by animals and plants are termed essential, while those not required are nonessential. Trace essential elements such as fluorine, copper, selenium, molybdenum, and others listed in the table on page 1 can be hazardous to life forms if present at high levels. Nonessential heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, and chromium are usually toxic to organisms at much lower levels than trace essential elements. Depending on the association that these nonessential elements may form with natural geologic materials such as organic matter, other elements or minerals, and adsorbers (such as clays), these elements can range from being safe to being extremely toxic. The elemental composition of plants, animals, and humans correlates with the geologic makeup of the Earth, and life has evolved reflecting these natural occurrences. The science of environmental geochemistry examines the interrelationship of life with the physical and chemical Earth.

Circular↗

The geology of radon

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

General Interest Publication↗

Map showing radon potential of rocks and soils in Fairfax County, Virginia

Since 1984, indoor radon has gained national attention as a significant health hazard in the United States. Radon is a colorless, odorless, radioactive gas derived from uranium by radioactive decay. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now projects that 5,000 to 20,000 lung-cancer deaths per year may be attributed to the long-term exposure to indoor radon and its radioactive decay products. Indoor radon has been previously recognized as a health hazard associated with uranium-bearing mill tailings or building materials, but it was not until December 1984 that some natural soils and rocks were found to be sources of indoor radon at levels comparable to those in uranium mines. It is now suspected that elevated indoor radon levels are far more widespread than initially though. The EPA considers 4 picoCuries of radon per liter of air (pCi/L) as the level (in a year-round measurement) at which actions ought to be taken to lower the concentration of indoor radon. All soils and rocks contain measurable amounts of uranium, which generate measurable amounts of radon. Certain soils and rocks, however, have a greater potential to cause indoor radon problems than others because (1) they have a higher uranium content and thus can generate higher levels of radon in soil gas (gas that occupies the pores of the soil), and (2) the permeability of the sol or rack is sufficiently high that radon-bearing soil gas can flow freely and move indoors through the foundation of the structure. This study was designed to demonstrate the correlation between the geologic environment and indoor radon levels and to demonstrate a method of assessment that could be used by other informed workers in areas of their interest. A parallel study by Gundersen and others (1988) of the radon potential of rocks and soils in Montgomery County, Md., used somewhat different methods of assessment because the data available for and assessment of Montgomery County differed.

Virginia↗