Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

G. S. Fox

Publications and source records attributed to G. S. Fox.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Capillary losses from ground water

A method is presented for estimating the discharge of ground water by evapotranspiration of water rising from the water table by capillarity. ‘Potential capillary water loss’ is defined as a measure of the ability of the capillary interstices of a soil to raise water from the water table to the ground surface. Published equations describing soil‐moisture movement and published graphs relating capillary conductivity and capillary potential are used to derive expressions of the relation between ‘potential capillary water loss’ and depth to the water table in a given soil. On the basis of these theoretical relationships, graphs are drawn that show how the depth to the water table affects the ability of a particular soil to raise water to the ground surface under given conditions. The application of these methods is discussed in relation to the estimation of ground‐water losses by capillary rise, the determination of potential evapotranspiration, and the analysis of soil‐tank data. Their essential agreement with empirical profiles of capillary potential obtained in soil tanks demonstrates their usefulness.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

The displacement of calibration curves for electrical soil‐moisture units

Electrical‐resistance blocks were calibrated for use in soil‐moisture studies at Seabrook, N.J. Curves from successive laboratory calibrations are positioned differently because of the effects of chemical quality of the water used, drying techniques and other factors. Furthermore, the laboratory curves are displaced from the field calibration curves because of the difficulty of establishing moisture equilibrium in laboratory samples. It is believed that the results demonstrate the general unreliability of laboratory calibrations when compared with field calibrations of soil‐moisture blocks

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

Discussion of “The displacement of calibration curves for electrical soil‐moisture units”

This paper seems to leave unanswered a number of questions pertaining to calibration of soil‐moisture units. In Remson and Fox's discussion of results they list five facts that are shown by the calibration. The first three deal with the second drying curve being different than the first, and subsequent dryings being similar to the second one. Similar findings were brought out before by Bouyoucos [1949], and later substantiated by Colman [1949] and by others including the work at the Coshocton Station. The writer's discussion, however, is confined to the discrepancy of field calibration with laboratory calibrations which comprise the fourth and fifth facts discussed by Remson and Fox.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

Some unreliable types of ground-water observation wells

Several primary requirements must be fulfilled by any observation well that is to be used as an indicator of ground-water levels over considerable distances. First of all, the water level inside the well must be the same as that outside of the well. the water level inside the well must be able to adjust to water -level fluctuations in the aquifer within a certain period of time, that time dependent upon the type of study for which the observations are to be used. Finally, to be of value in most areal studies, the water level outside the well must be representative of the level throughout the aquifer, and not reflect merely some speical local condition. Should any of these requirements remain unsatisfied, the derived data may be misleading.

Open-File Report