Geology ReportsSearch

Geology topics

Fred A. Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to Fred A. Taylor.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Estimating the costs of landslide damage in the United States

Landslide damages are one of the most costly natural disasters in the United States. A recent estimate of the total annual cost of landslide damage is in excess of $1 billion {Schuster, 1978}. The damages can be significantly reduced, however, through the combined action of technical experts, government, and the public. Before they can be expected to take action, local governments need to have an appreciation of costs of damage in their areas of responsibility and of the reductions in losses that can be achieved. Where studies of cost of landslide damages have been conducted, it is apparent that {1} costs to the public and private sectors of our economy due to landslide damage are much larger than anticipated; {2} taxpayers and public officials generally are unaware of the magnitude of the cost, owing perhaps to the lack of any centralization of data; and {3} incomplete records and unavailability of records result in lower reported costs than actually were incurred. The U.S. Geological Survey has developed a method to estimate the cost of landslide damages in regional and local areas and has applied the method in three urban areas and one rural area. Costs are for different periods and are unadjusted for inflation; therefore, strict comparisons of data from different years should be avoided. Estimates of the average annual cost of landslide damage for the urban areas studied are $5,900,000 in the San Francisco Bay area; $4,000,000 in Allegheny County, Pa.; and $5,170,000 in Hamilton County, Ohio. Adjusting these figures for the population of each area, the annual cost of damages per capita are $1.30 in the nine-county San Francisco Bay region; $2.50 in Allegheny County, Pa.; and $5.80 in Hamilton County, Ohio. On the basis of data from other sources, the estimated annual damages on a per capita basis for the City of Los Angeles, Calif., are about $1.60. If the costs were available for the damages from landslides in Los Angeles in 1977-78 and 1979-80, the annual per capita costs probably would be much larger. The landslide near the rural community of Manti, Utah, caused an expenditure of about $1,800,000 or about $1,000 per person during the period 1974-76. Because a recurrence for such a landslide cannot be established, it is not possible to develop a meaningful estimate of annual per capita damages. Communities are urged to examine their costs of landslide damage and to evaluate the feasibility of several alternative programs that, for a modest investment, could significantly reduce these losses.

Circular

Distribution and cost of landslides that have damaged manmade structures during the rainy season of 1972-1973 in the San Francisco Bay region, California

This report presents data on the location and cost of damage related to landslides in the San Francisco Bay region during the rainy season of 1972-73 (figs. 1 and 2). By showing the general location of landslides that caused damage during that season, the report also shows which parts of the region have the most severe problems. These data supplement earlier reports by the U.S . Geological Survey on the damage caused by landsliding throughout the bay region during the rainy season of 1968-69 (Taylor and Brabb, 1972), in Contra Costa County from 1950 to 1971 (Nilsen and Turner, 1975), in Alameda County from 1940 to 1971 (Nilsen and others, 1975), and in the northeastern part of the city of San Jose from 1967 to 1971 (Nilsen and Brabb, 1972). The nine San Francisco Bay region counties are included in this investigation: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San ,Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma. Landslide costs for these counties during the 1972-73 rainy season (table 1) were at least \$9,716,284. Of this total, $3,284,918 was direct loss of or damage to private property, mainly by lowering the property market value, and \$6,431,366 was for public property, chiefly for repair or relocation of roads. The data used to compile these costs are incomplete, thus the total cost could be significantly greater.

California