Geology topics

Erica Bree Rosenblum

Publications and source records attributed to Erica Bree Rosenblum.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2023

Revisiting conservation units for the endangered mountain yellow-legged frog species complex (Rana muscosa, Rana sierrae) using multiple genomic methods

Insights from conservation genomics have dramatically improved recovery plans for numerous endangered species. However, most taxa have yet to benefit from the full application of genomic technologies. The mountain yellow-legged frog species complex, Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae, inhabits the Sierra Nevada mountains and Transverse/Peninsular Ranges of California and Nevada. Both species have declined precipitously throughout their historical distributions. Conservation management plans outline extensive ongoing recovery efforts but are still based on the genetic structure determined primarily using a single mitochondrial sequence. Our study used two different sequencing strategies – amplicon sequencing and exome capture – to refine our understanding of the population genetics of these imperiled amphibians. We used buccal swabs, museum tissue samples, and archived skin swabs to genotype frog populations across their range. Using the amplicon sequencing and exome capture datasets separately and combined, we document five major genetic clusters. Notably, we found evidence supporting previous species boundaries within Kings Canyon National Park with some exceptions at individual sites. Though we see evidence of genetic clustering, especially in the R. muscosa clade, we also found evidence of some admixture across cluster boundaries in the R. sierrae clade, suggesting a stepping-stone model of population structure. We also find that the southern R. muscosa cluster had large runs of homozygosity and the lowest overall heterozygosity of any of the clusters, consistent with previous reports of marked declines in this area. Overall, our results clarify management unit designations across the range of an endangered species and highlight the importance of sampling the entire range of a species, even when collecting genome-scale data.

California↗

USGS2016

Large-scale recovery of an endangered amphibian despite ongoing exposure to multiple stressors

Amphibians are one of the most threatened animal groups, with 32% of species at risk for extinction. Given this imperiled status, is the disappearance of a large fraction of the Earth’s amphibians inevitable, or are some declining species more resilient than is generally assumed? We address this question in a species that is emblematic of many declining amphibians, the endangered Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog ( Rana sierrae ). Based on >7,000 frog surveys conducted across Yosemite National Park over a 20-y period, we show that, after decades of decline and despite ongoing exposure to multiple stressors, including introduced fish, the recently emerged disease chytridiomycosis, and pesticides, R. sierrae abundance increased sevenfold during the study and at a rate of 11% per year. These increases occurred in hundreds of populations throughout Yosemite, providing a rare example of amphibian recovery at an ecologically relevant spatial scale. Results from a laboratory experiment indicate that these increases may be in part because of reduced frog susceptibility to chytridiomycosis. The disappearance of nonnative fish from numerous water bodies after cessation of stocking also contributed to the recovery. The large-scale increases in R. sierrae abundance that we document suggest that, when habitats are relatively intact and stressors are reduced in their importance by active management or species’ adaptive responses, declines of some amphibians may be partially reversible, at least at a regional scale. Other studies conducted over similarly large temporal and spatial scales are critically needed to provide insight and generality about the reversibility of amphibian declines at a global scale.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of↗

USGS2014

Moving beyond too little, too late: managing emerging infectious diseases in wild populations requires international policy and partnerships

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are on the rise due to multiple factors, including human facilitated movement of pathogens, broad-scale landscape changes, and perturbations to ecological systems (Jones et al. 2008; Fisher et al. 2012). Epidemics in wildlife are problematic because they can lead to pathogen spillover to new host organisms, erode biodiversity and threaten ecosystems that sustain human societies (Fisher et al. 2012; Kilpatrick 2011). There have been recent calls for large-scale research approaches to combat threats EIDs pose to wildlife (Sleeman 2013). While it is true that developing new analytical models, diagnostic assays and molecular tools will significantly avance outr abilities to respond to disease threats, we also propose that addressing difficult problems in EIDs will require considerable shofts in international health policy and infrastructure. While there are currently international organizations responsbile for rapidly initiating and coordinating preventative measures to control infectious diseases in human, livestock, and arable systems, there are few comparable instiutions that have the authority to implement transnational responses to EIDs in wildlife. This absence of well-developed infastructure hampers the rapid responses necessary to mitigate international spread of EIDs.

EcoHealth↗

USGS2011

Ranavirus outbreaks in amphibian populations of northern Idaho

Ranavirus outbreaks, caused by pathogens in the genus Ranavirus (Family Iridoviridae), were the largest single cause of reported amphibian mass mortality events in the United States from 1996–2001 (Green et al. 2002). Mortality events associated with ranaviruses have been documented on five continents and throughout the latitudes and elevations where amphibians occur (Gray et al. 2009). However, the threat of ranaviruses to amphibian and reptile populations in specific regions is still largely unknown (Chinchar 2002; Gray et al. 2009).

Idaho↗