Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Emily E. Woodward

Publications and source records attributed to Emily E. Woodward.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Data-collection methods for total dissolved gases monitoring, Youghiogheny River at Dam Outlet Tunnel near Confluence, Pennsylvania

Supersaturation of total dissolved gases (TDG) can potentially occur in the tailrace water at the Youghiogheny River at dam outlet tunnel near Confluence, Pennsylvania (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] streamgaging and monitoring station 03077100). The USGS, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, established methods to collect and report TDG saturation data in the tailrace below the Youghiogheny Dam. Monitoring and TDG data collection started in June 2008 and continues currently (2025). Data are collected from June 1 through November 30 of each year, and these data are used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to guide management of the dam outflow. Methods used for data collection, processing, reporting, and quality assurance for TDG monitored at USGS station 03077100 are presented in this report. The TDG data are publicly available in the USGS National Water Information System database.

Pennsylvania↗

Assessing pesticide application contributions of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural streams

Research has documented per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to be prevalent in streams impacted by urban sources; less is known regarding PFAS contributions via pesticide applications: PFAS coming from pesticide containers and “inert” ingredients not listed on pesticide formulation labels. To better understand co-occurrence of pesticides and PFAS in agricultural streams, 10 streams were sampled in two agricultural valleys in northern California, USA during two periods of pesticide application (May and July of 2024). Water samples were analyzed for 183 pesticides and 57 PFAS. Sixty pesticides were detected: 23 herbicides, 18 insecticides, 18 fungicides, and 1 synergist. Overall detection frequencies (DF) ranged from 0 to 100%, and concentrations ranged from non-detect (ND) to 782 ng/L (fluxapyroxad). Fourteen PFAS were detected: 6 perfluoroalkyl carboxylates, 5 perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, 2 perfluoroalkyl acid precursors, and 1 perfluoroalkyl phosphinic acid with DFs ranging from 0 to 60% (PFOA) and concentrations ranging from ND to 20 ng/L (PFBA). Co-occurrence of PFAS and pesticides was observed in 80% of samples. Adopting the global definition of PFAS (includes fluorinated pesticides), pesticide applications are a likely source of instream PFAS. Examination of total organic fluorine and transformations to terminal and ultra-short PFAS could further elucidate pesticide contributions to environmental PFAS.

California↗

Using a time-of-travel sampling approach to quantify per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) stream loading and source inputs in a mixed-source, urban catchment

Understanding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mass distribution in surface and groundwater systems can support source prioritization, load reduction, and water management. Thirteen sites within an urban catchment were sampled utilizing a time-of-travel sampling approach to minimize the influence of subdaily fluctuations in mass from PFAS point sources and to quantify PFAS and ancillary chemical loads from various PFAS sources. A larger increase in perfluoroalkyl sulfonate (PFSA) loads (8 to 11 μg/s, up to 618%) than in perfluoroalkyl carboxylate (PFCA) loads (no change to 3.4 μg/s, up to 122%) was observed at sites below tributaries influenced by military bases with known groundwater discharge. Point discharges from two sewage treatment plants (STPs) resulted in increases in PFCA and PFSA loads that were similar (6 and 10 μg/s respectively) below the first STP and greater for PFCA compared to PFSA loads (23 and 13 μg/s respectively) below the second STP. Overall, percent increases in total PFAS load ranged from 20 to 277% for military base inputs and 44 to 77% for STP inputs. A focus catchment that represents only 14% (76.9 km 2 ) of the drainage area at the most downstream site (544 km 2 ) accounted for about 70% of PFSA and 40% of PFCA loads observed at the most downstream site. Results show that by using a time-of-travel sampling approach in mixed, urban settings with several PFAS sources, it is possible to quantify stream loads from individual PFAS sources, thereby improving source attribution and providing actionable data for water-resource managers.

ACS ES&T Water↗

Multiresidue extraction of current-use pesticides from complex solid matrices using energized dispersive guided extraction with analysis by gas and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy

The development of sample processing techniques that recover a broad suite of pesticides from solid matrices, while mitigating coextracted matrix interferences, and reducing processing time is beneficial for high throughput analyses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an automated extraction system for pesticide analyses in solid environmental samples. An Energized Dispersive Guided Extraction (EDGE) system was used to evaluate two different extraction solvents in optimizing the extraction of 210 pesticides and pesticide transformation products. A graphitized carbon cleanup step was implemented, and three elution solvents were evaluated separately for analyte recoveries. Recoveries between 70 and 130% were achieved for 167 compounds in a test soil using acetonitrile as an extraction solvent and carbon cleanup with acetonitrile and dichloromethane elutions. Nine field samples (soil, sediment, and biosolids) were extracted using the newly developed method and were compared with a previously validated pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) method using an Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) system. Concentrations obtained from the two methods were comparable (linear R 2 > 0.999), suggesting similar performance between the EDGE and PLE extractions in complex matrices. The new method provided slightly better sensitivities in comparison to the PLE method, ranging from 0.09 to 2.56 ng g −1 . The method presented here significantly reduces extraction setup and runtimes while also minimizing the volume of carcinogenic solvents ( e.g. , dichloromethane) used in the laboratory and presents a sensitive multiresidue method for a wide range of pesticides in solid matrices.

Chemosphere↗

Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in Pennsylvania surface waters: A statewide assessment, associated sources, and land-use relations

The objectives of this study are to identify per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Pennsylvania surface waters, corresponding associations with potential sources of PFAS contamination (PSOC) and other parameters, and compare raw surface water concentrations to human and ecological benchmarks. Surface water samples from 161 streams were collected in September 2019 and were analyzed for 33 target PFAS and water chemistry. Land use and physical attributes in upstream catchments and geospatial counts of PSOC in local catchments are summarized. The hydrologic yield of the sum of 33 PFAS (∑PFAS) for each stream was computed by normalizing each site's load by the drainage area of the upstream catchment. Utilizing conditional inference tree analysis, the percentage of development (>7.58 %) was identified as a primary driver of the ∑PFAS hydrologic yields. When percentage of development was removed from analysis, ∑PFAS yields were closely related to surface water chemistry associated with landscape alteration (e.g., development or agricultural cropland), such as concentrations of total nitrogen, chloride, and ammonia, but also to count of water pollution control facilities (agricultural, industrial, stormwater, and/or municipal waste pollution abatement facilities). In oil and gas development regions, ∑PFAS yields were associated with combined sewage outfalls. Sites surrounded by ≥2 electronic manufacturing facilities had elevated ∑PFAS yields (median = 241 ng/s/km 2 ). Study results are critical to guide future research, regulatory policy, best practices that will mitigate PFAS contamination, and the communication of human health and ecological risks associated with PFAS exposure from surface waters.

Pennsylvania↗

Evaluation of ELISA for the analysis of imidacloprid in biological matrices: Cross-reactivities, matrix interferences, and comparison to LC-MS/MS

Imidacloprid is among the most used pesticides worldwide and there are toxicity concerns for nontarget organisms. Accurate and sensitive methods are necessary to quantitate imidacloprid concentrations in biological matrices to better understand their fate and effects. Here we evaluated an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for the analysis of imidacloprid in biological samples. Following the dosing of Japanese quail ( Coturnix japonica ) with imidacloprid-treated wheat seeds, plasma, liver, and fecal matter samples were analyzed by ELISA and compared to previous analyses that employed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Imidacloprid metabolites—5-OH-imidacloprid, imidacloprid-olefin, imidacloprid-urea, desnitro-imidacloprid, and 6-chloronicotinic acid—were tested for their cross-reactivity to antibodies within the commercial imidacloprid ELISA kit. The two major metabolites, 5-OH-imidacloprid and imidacloprid-olefin, showed cross-reactivities of 0.93–26 %. ELISA and LC-MS/MS results were positively correlated but there was poor agreement in concentrations: plasma and fecal matter imidacloprid concentrations were higher by ELISA, whereas liver imidacloprid concentrations were higher by LC-MS/MS. Matrix interferences observed in analyses were minimized by the application of matrix-matched calibration curves. ELISA provided an effective screening tool for imidacloprid in these biological matrices, but the presence of cross-reactants confounded results. Confirmation of ELISA results by more selective techniques (e.g., LC-MS/MS) is suggested for complex samples.

Chemosphere↗

Comparing imidacloprid, clothianidin, and azoxystrobin runoff from lettuce fields using a soil drench or treated seeds in the Salinas Valley, California

Neonicotinoid insecticide use has increased over the last decade, including as agricultural seed treatments (application of chemical in a coating to the seed prior to planting). In California, multiple crops, including lettuce, can be grown using neonicotinoid treated seeds or receive a direct neonicotinoid soil application (drenching) at planting. Using research plots, this study compared pesticide runoff in four treatments: (1) imidacloprid seed treatment; (2) clothianidin seed treatment; (3) imidacloprid drench and an azoxystrobin seed treatment; and (4) a control with no pesticidal treatment. Neonicotinoid and azoxystrobin concentrations were measured in surface water runoff during six irrigations events in the 2020 growing seasons. Results showed runoff concentrations up to 1308 (±1200) ng L −1 for imidacloprid drench treatment, 431 (±100) ng L −1 for clothianidin seed treatment, 135 (±60) ng L −1 for imidacloprid seed treatment, 13 (±10) ng L −1 for azoxystrobin seed treatment (treatments averaged). The percent of applied mass in runoff over the entire sampling period varied by compound; the imidacloprid seed treatment and drench were similar (0.015 and 0.019%, respectively) to the clothianidin seed treatment (0.036%) while the azoxystrobin seed treatment was much higher (15%). Although the proportion of imidacloprid in runoff was similar for imidacloprid treatments, the mass applied during soil drench was > 4x the amount applied from the imidacloprid seed treatment. Surface soils were collected before planting and at the end of the trial. The neonicotinoids were detected in soil throughout the study and average maximum concentrations were 9–13 ng g −1 ; azoxystrobin was detected in only two soils at concentrations up to 0.57 ng g −1 . These results elucidate the comparative mass runoff resulting from planting treated seed and soil drench applications and highlight the value of additional work to characterize off-site transport from the many commodities that may be utilizing treated seeds.

California↗

Widespread use of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin: Assessing benefits and costs to agriculture, ecosystems, and environmental health

Agricultural production and associated applications of nitrogen (N) fertilizers have increased dramatically in the last century, and current projections to 2050 show that demands will continue to increase as the human population grows. Applied in both organic and inorganic fertilizer forms, N is an essential nutrient in crop productivity. Increased fertilizer applications, however, create the potential for more N loss before plant uptake. One strategy for minimizing N loss is the use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers, fortified with a nitrification inhibitor, such as nitrapyrin. In soils and water, nitrapyrin inhibits the activity of ammonia monooxygenase, a microbial enzyme that catalyzes the first step of nitrification from ammonium to nitrite. Potential benefits of using nitrification inhibitors range from reduced nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions to increased crop yield. The extent of these benefits, however, depends on environmental conditions and management practices. Thus, such benefits are not always realized. Additionally, nitrapyrin has been shown to transport off-field, and it is unknown what effects environmental nitrapyrin could have on nontarget organisms and the ecological nitrogen cycle. Here, we review the agronomic and environmental benefits and costs of nitrapyrin use and present a series of research questions and considerations to be addressed with future nitrification inhibitor research.

Environmental Science and Technology↗

Pesticide mixtures in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, 2016–17: Results from year 2 of the Delta Regional Monitoring Program

The Delta Regional Monitoring Program was developed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board in response to the decline of pelagic fish species in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta that was observed in the early 2000s. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Delta Regional Monitoring Program, has been responsible for collecting and analyzing surface-water samples for a suite of 154 pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and in suspended sediment. Additional samples were collected for the analysis of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved copper, particulate organic carbon, particulate inorganic carbon, total particulate carbon, and total particulate nitrogen; and field water-quality indicators (water temperature, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, pH, and turbidity) were measured at each site. Five integrator sites on streams draining mixed land-use watersheds were sampled monthly from July 2016 to June 2017. Two sites were sampled in the San Joaquin River watershed and one site was sampled in each of the Mokelumne River, Sacramento River, and Ulatis Creek watersheds. A total of 53 out of 154 pesticides (18 herbicides, 14 insecticides, 13 fungicides, 7 breakdown products, and 1 synergist) were detected in surface-water samples and 95 percent of samples contained mixtures of 2 or more pesticides. The most frequently detected pesticides were the herbicides hexazinone, metolachlor, and diuron (present in 83 percent, 72 percent, and 67 percent of water samples, respectively), the insecticide methoxyfenozide (present in 83 percent of samples), and the fungicides boscalid and azoxystrobin (present in 67 percent and 58 percent of samples, respectively). Pesticide concentrations detected in water samples ranged from below method detection limits to 1,300 nanograms per liter (ng/L) for the insecticide chlorantraniliprole. A total of 4 pesticides (2 herbicides and 2 insecticides) were detected in suspended-sediment samples and 13 percent of suspended-sediment samples contained at least 1 pesticide. Pesticide concentrations detected in suspended-sediment samples ranged from 4.1 to 750 ng/L, both for the herbicide pendimethalin. Six samples contained the insecticide imidacloprid at concentrations above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Aquatic Life Benchmark (10 ng/L) for chronic toxicity to aquatic invertebrates. Three samples contained bifenthrin at concentrations above the EPA Aquatic Life Benchmark (1.3 ng/L) for chronic toxicity to invertebrates. One sample contained cyhalothrin at a concentration above the U.S. Aquatic Life Benchmark (3.5 ng/L) for acute toxicity to invertebrates.

California↗

Fate and transport of nitrapyrin in agroecosystems: Occurrence in agricultural soils, subsurface drains, and receiving streams in the Midwestern US

Nitrapyrin is a nitrification inhibitor that is co-applied with nitrogen fertilizer in agroecosystems. There is limited information on the fate of nitrapyrin after it is applied to agricultural soils. Over the course of one year (March 2016 to June 2017), 192 water samples from seven streams across Iowa and Illinois were analyzed for nitrapyrin, its metabolite 6‑chloropicolinic acid (6‑CPA), and three widely used herbicides acetochlor, atrazine , and metolachlor. Additional environmental samples were collected and analyzed in spring 2017: 63 water samples from eight subsurface drains in Illinois, and 33 soil samples from a field in Iowa that received direct application of nitrapyrin. Nitrapyrin was detected in all seven streams (56% detection) with concentrations ranging from less than LOD to 1200 ng/L; 6‑CPA was detected in six of the seven streams (13% detection) with concentrations ranging from less than LOD to 13 ng/L. Nitrapyrin was detected in 10% of the subsurface drain samples with concentrations ranging from less than LOD to 12 ng/L; 6‑CPA was detected in six of the eight subsurface drains and in 33% of drain samples with concentrations ranging from less than LOD to 6 ng/L. Nitrapyrin was detected in 67% of the soil samples collected, and concentrations ranged from less than LOD to 42 ng/g. Generally, all three herbicides were detected more frequently and at higher concentrations than nitrapyrin in the streams, subsurface drains, and soils. The environmental fate of nitrapyrin after application is dominated by sorption to soil and off-field transport via leaching and overland flow.

Illinois, Iowa↗

Occurrence of dichloroacetamide herbicide safeners and co-applied herbicides in midwestern U.S. streams

Dichloroacetamide safeners (e.g., AD-67, benoxacor, dichlormid, and furilazole) are co-applied with chloroacetanilide herbicides to protect crops from herbicide toxicity. While such safeners have been used since the early 1970s, there are minimal data about safener usage, occurrence in streams, or potential ecological effects. This study focused on one of these research gaps, occurrence in streams. Seven Midwestern U.S. streams (five in Iowa and two in Illinois), with extensive row-crop agriculture, were sampled at varying frequencies from spring 2016 through summer 2017. All four safeners were detected at least once; furilazole was the most frequently detected (31%), followed by benoxacor (29%), dichlormid (15%), and AD-67 (2%). The maximum concentrations ranged from 42 to 190 ng/L. Stream detections and concentrations of safeners appear to be driven by a combination of timing of application (spring following herbicide application) and precipitation events. Detected concentrations were below known toxicity levels for aquatic organisms.

Illinois, Iowa↗

Nitrapyrin in streams: The first study documenting off-field transport of a nitrogen stabilizer compound

Nitrapyrin is a bactericide that is co-applied with fertilizer to prevent nitrification and enhance corn yields. While there have been studies of the environmental fate of nitrapyrin, there is no documentation of its off-field transport to streams. In 2016, 59 water samples from 11 streams across Iowa were analyzed for nitrapyrin and its degradate, 6-chloropicolinic acid (6-CPA), along with three widely used herbicides, acetochlor, atrazine, and metolachlor. Nitrapyrin was detected in seven streams (39% of water samples) with concentrations ranging from 12 to 240 ng/L; 6-CPA was never detected. The herbicides were ubiquitously detected (100% of samples, 28–16000 ng/L). Higher nitrapyrin concentrations in streams were associated with rainfall events following spring fertilizer applications. Nitrapyrin persisted in streams for up to 5 weeks. These results highlight the need for more research focused on the environmental fate and transport of nitrapyrin and the potential toxicity this compound could have on nontarget organisms.

Environmental Science & Technology Letters↗