Catherine A. Pfister | Geology Reports

USGS2026

Severity and certainty metric for kelp stressors: A tool for research, management, and conservation

Foundation species face multiple threats, and many are in decline worldwide. Kelps are no exception, with declines documented throughout their range. Stressors such as warming, eutrophication, and reduced water quality—often linked to human activities—are well recognized, yet their relative severity and certainty have not been systematically evaluated. Such a framework may aid scientific, regulatory, and conservation organizations in prioritizing actions and decision making. Here we build on a conceptual model of stressors to kelp in the Salish Sea by rating stressor severity and scientific certainty. We convened a panel of regional kelp experts to perform the rating exercise for two canopy taxa, Nereocystis luetkeana and Macrocystis tenuifolia , as well as a grouping for understory species, including both the sporophyte (adult) and gametophyte (juvenile) life stages for these algae. Our process produced a rich dataset which can be separated by stressor, taxa, and life stage allowing for broad applications. The panel identified temperature, low nutrients, and substrate change/benthic sedimentation as the most severe stressors to kelp, with relatively high certainty for most taxa. Certainty scores were relatively high for Nereocystis and Macrocystis sporophytes but were considerably lower for understory species and the gametophyte life stage, for most stressors, highlighting research gaps. Our data set could be applied for management prioritization, setting ecological baselines, and spatial modeling exercises. We encourage scientific, regulatory, and conservation organizations to consider both our data and our process when evaluating their needs. As foundation species continue to face threats, exercises such as this can provide scientists and managers with actionable indices that support strategies to stem degradation.

Ecological Indicators↗

USGS2016

Historical baselines and the future of shell calcification for a foundation species in a changing ocean

Seawater pH and the availability of carbonate ions are decreasing due to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, posing challenges for calcifying marine species. Marine mussels are of particular concern given their role as foundation species worldwide. Here, we document shell growth and calcification patterns in Mytilus californianus , the California mussel, over millennial and decadal scales. By comparing shell thickness across the largest modern shells, the largest mussels collected in the 1960s–1970s and shells from two Native American midden sites (&sim;1000–2420 years BP), we found that modern shells are thinner overall, thinner per age category and thinner per unit length. Thus, the largest individuals of this species are calcifying less now than in the past. Comparisons of shell thickness in smaller individuals over the past 10–40 years, however, do not show significant shell thinning. Given our sampling strategy, these results are unlikely to simply reflect within-site variability or preservation effects. Review of environmental and biotic drivers known to affect shell calcification suggests declining ocean pH as a likely explanation for the observed shell thinning. Further future decreases in shell thickness could have significant negative impacts on M. californianus survival and, in turn, negatively impact the species-rich complex that occupies mussel beds. .

Proceedings of the Royal Society B↗