Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

C.S. Spirakis

Publications and source records attributed to C.S. Spirakis.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS1992

Organic matter diagenesis as the key to a unifying theory for the genesis of tabular uranium-vanadium deposits in the Morrison Formation, Colorado Plateau

Interstitial, epigenetic amorphous organic matter is intimately associated with uranium in the Grants uranium region on the southern part of the Colorado Plateau in northwestern New Mexico and is considered essential to genetic models for these deposits. In contrast, uranium minerals are intimately associated with authigenic vanadium chlorite and vanadium oxides in amorphous organic matter-poor ores of the Slick Rock and Henry Mountains mining districts on the northern part of the plateau, and therefore, in some genetic models amorphous organic matter is not considered crucial to the formation of these deposits. Differences in organic matter content can be explained by recognizing that amorphous organic matter-poor deposits have been subjected to more advanced stages of diagenesis than amorphous organic matter-rich deposits, during which organic compounds were broken down, solubilized, and removed during various diagenetic stages (e.g., sulfate reduction, methanogenesis, and organic acid production). Most diagenetic alterations (e.g., dissolution of framework grains and cements and precipitation of coarse-grained coffinite, vanadium clays, and vanadium oxides) characteristic of amorphous organic matter-poor deposits occurred when temperatures exceeded 80 degrees C--a temperature typical of the organic acid stage of diagenesis.Two factors combined to assure that a high percentage of the amorphous organic matter was removed from the Morrison Formation during diagenesis: the fact that the organic matter was humic (and therefore highly oxygenated), and that the juxtaposition of authigenic smectite and amorphous organic matter on grain rims facilitated clay mineral-organic catalysis reactions leading to the breakdown of large organic molecules into smaller, soluble molecules.Evidence that amorphous organic matter was involved in the genesis of organic matter-poor, as well as organic matter-rich, deposits includes the presence of leached iron-titanium oxides and strongly etched garnets (both attributed to leaching by organic acids), the gradation from organic matter-rich to organic matter-poor deposits in the Grants uranium region, the inverse correlation between the amount of amorphous organic matter and the intensity of diagenetic alteration, the ubiquitous occurrence of amorphous organic matter inclusions in coffinite, and the similarity in geometry of tabular uranium-vanadium ores and Holocene humate deposits. By recognizing that amorphous organic matter was crucial to the initial concentration of uranium (even in those deposits that presently contain little amorphous organic matter) and by recognizing the effects of the various stages of diagenesis on the ore, one genetic model may be applied to all of the sandstone-hosted, tabular-type uranium-vanadium deposits in the Morrison Formation on the Colorado Plateau.

Economic Geology↗
USGS1991

The possible role of thiosulfate in the precipitation of 34S-rich barite in some Mississippi Valley-type deposits

The precipitation of extremely 34S-rich barite in the late stage of mineralization in the Mississippi Valleytype deposits of the Illinois-Kentucky district (U.S.A.) may be explained by reactions involving thiosulfate (S2O3=). Inorganic processes are known to concentrate 34S in the sulfonate site of thiosulfate and 32S in the sulfate site. In the mineralizing solution, these inorganic processes may have fractionated sulfur between the two sites by about 40 per mil. At the low temperatures of the late barite stage of mineralization, bacteria are known to metabolize thiosulfate by various reactions. In one of these, dissimilatory reduction, hydrogen sulfide and sulfite are produced. Isotopically light sulfite is preferentially reduced to sulfide by bacteria to leave a residual sulfite enriched in 34S. Part of the residual sulfite may be oxidized to form isotopically heavy sulfate; part may recombine with hydrogen sulfide to form thiosulfate. The recombination also enriches the sulfonate site in 34S and the sulfane site in 32S. Recycling the newly formed thiosulfate through the above steps further enriches sulfite and sulfate from oxidation of sulfite in 34S. During genesis of the ores, the aggregate effect of these reactions may have been the precipitation of extremely 34S-rich barite. The sequence of reactions suggested above requires the presence of organic matter. Previously proposed reactions to account for the precipitation of sulfide minerals and fluorite and for the carbonate paragenesis also require the presence of organic matter. Thus, organic matter in the host rocks may cause the various ore-zone reactions and account for the localization of the ores. ?? 1991 Springer-Verlag.

Mineralium Deposita↗
USGS1983

Statistical treatment and preliminary interpretation of chemical data from a uranium deposit in the northeast part of the Church Rock area, Gallup mining district, New Mexico

Statistical treatment of analytical data from 106 samples of uranium-mineralized and unmineralized or weakly mineralized rocks of the Morrison Formation from the northeastern part of the Church Rock area of the Grants uranium region indicates that along with uranium, the deposits in the northeast Church Rock area are enriched in barium, sulfur, sodium, vanadium and equivalent uranium. Selenium and molybdenum are sporadically enriched in the deposits and calcium, manganese, strontium, and yttrium are depleted. Unlike the primary deposits of the San Juan Basin, the deposits in the northeast part of the Church Rock area contain little organic carbon and several elements that are characteristically enriched in the primary deposits are not enriched or are enriched to a much lesser degree in the Church Rock deposits. The suite of elements associated with the deposits in the northeast part of the Church Rock area is also different from the suite of elements associated with the redistributed deposits in the Ambrosia Lake district. This suggests that the genesis of the Church Rock deposits is different, at least in part, from the genesis of the primary deposits of the San Juan Basin or the redistributed deposits at Ambrosia Lake.

Open-File Report↗
USGS1983

Comparison of the chemical characteristics of the uranium deposits of the Morrison Formation in the Grants uranium region, New Mexico

Statistical treatment of the chemical data of samples from the northeast Church Rock area, Ruby deposit, Mariano Lake deposit, and the Ambrosia Lake district indicates that primary ore-forming processes concentrated copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, organic carbon, and sulfur, along with uranium. A barium halo that is associated with all of these deposits formed from secondary processes. Calcium and strontium were also enriched in the ores by secondary processes. Comparison of the chemical characteristics of the redistributed deposits in the Church Rock district to the primary deposits in the Grants uranium region indicates that calcium, manganese, strontium, yttrium, copper, iron, magnesium, molybdenum, lead, selenium, and vanadium are separated from uranium during redistribution of the deposits in the Church Rock area. Comparisons of the chemical characteristics of the Church Rock deposits and the secondary deposits at Ambrosia Lake suggest some differences in the processes that were involved in the genesis of the redistributed deposits in these two areas.

Open-File Report↗
USGS1977

Uranium, radium, and selected metallic-element analyses of spring water and travertine samples from the Grand Canyon, Arizona

Samples for this report were collected from springs and travertine deposits along the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. Sampling was done in April and May of 1976. Data obtained from these samples will be used by R. A. Cadigan and J. K. Felmlee as part of a project designed to determine the value of subsurface waters in prospecting for uranium deposits. Sample sites were preselected at approximately equal intervals, but river conditions and accessibility forced some modification of the sampling plan at each spring visited, a 2-liter untreated water sample was collected to be analyzed for uranium and radium. At two of the sample locations, an additional 4-liter water sample was collected, filtered, acidified, and later analyzed for the 24 additional elements listed in table-2. A more detailed description of the sampling technique is presented in Brown and others, 1970. All samples were placed in full, tightly capped plastic containers. Temperature and conductivity were measured in the field. Measurements of the pH of the non-acidified samples were made in the laboratory a few weeks after the samples were collected. An effort was made to collect the freshest possible travertine samples, but the freshness of the samples varied, as noted in the descriptions of the sample sites. Analyses were performed by laboratories of the U.S. Geological Survey. Radium values were determined by radiochemical methods; uranium, by extraction fluorometry; eU (equivalent uranium), by beta-gamma count; and other elements, by semiquantitative emission spectrography. Table 1 is a description of the sample sites. The analytical results for spring water are presented in table 2. Table 3 gives the analyses of the travertine samples.

Arizona↗