Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

C. S. Howard

Publications and source records attributed to C. S. Howard.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2014

Report of the committee on chemistry of natural waters, 1933–34

The personnel of this Committee during the past year, practically the same as during the previous year, has been as follows: C. S. Howard, Chairman—United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. L. C. Case—Gypsy Oil Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma. W. D. Collins—United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. H. F. Flynn—United States Engineer Office, 35 South Ninth Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. W. P. Kelley—University of California, Riverside, California. Alfred C. Lane—Tufts College, Tufts College, Massachusetts. Augustus Locke—477 Mills Building, San Francisco, California. R. D. Leitch—United States Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. H. T. Logan—United States Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. Thomas S. Lovering—United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. Thomas E. Means—111 Sutter Street, San Francisco, California. F. B. Plummer—University of Texas, Austin, Texas. J. W. Sale—United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. C S. Scofield—Bureau of Plant Industry, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Thomas G. Thompson—University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Report of the committee on chemistry of natural waters, 1935–36

The membership of this Committee was not changed during the past year. A publication has appeared during the year giving the analytical data assembled for and used as a basis for Bulletin 40 of the Department of Public Works, California. This new publication, printed as 40‐A, is entitled “Detailed analyses showing qualities of irrigation‐waters.” Analyses are given for both surface‐ and ground‐waters.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Suspended matter in the Colorado River, 1925–1935

The rugged topography of a great part of the Colorado River Basin is a significant factor in determining the quantity of water and suspended matter carried by the River. The mountainous regions of Colorado and Wyoming contribute a large part of the flow of the River, whereas the central part of the Basin, cut by deep gorges and canyons, contributes a large part of the suspended matter carried by the River. The discharge of the Colorado River as measured near Cisco, Utah, with a drainage‐area of 24,100 square miles is slightly greater than the discharge of the largest tributary, the Green River, measured near Greenriver, Utah, with a drainage‐area of 40,600 square miles. The Green, however, carries a considerably larger load of suspended matter. Two other tributaries, the San Juan and Little Colorado rivers, each with a drainage‐area of about 25,000 square miles, carry large loads of suspended matter in proportion to their discharge. For example, the Little Colorado River in the summer of 1931 contributed less than 10 per cent of the flow of the main river at Grand Canyon, but the Little Colorado carried about 10,000,000 tons of suspended matter during this period and the main river had about 25,000,000 tons for the same period.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Report of the committee on chemistry of natural waters, 1936–37

The membership of this Committee is as follows: C. S. Howard, Chairman, U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. D. G. Thompson, U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. A. C. Lane, 22 Arlington Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts C. S. Scofield, Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Dept. Agri., Washington, D. C. I. A. Denison, U.S. Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. T. G. Thompson, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington W. P. Kelley, Citrus Experiment Station, Riverside, California In order to provide for close cooperation between the work of the different research‐committees of the American Geophysical Union it was decided to have the chairmen of certain committees serve on other committees. The Chairman of the Committee on the Chemistry of Natural Waters is serving on the Committee of Underground waters and D. G. Thompson as Chairman of the Committee on Underground Waters is serving on the Committee on Chemistry of Natural Waters

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Report of the committee on chemistry of natural waters, 1938–39

The membership of this Committee is as follows: C. S. Howard (Chairman), United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. I. A. Denison, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. W. P. Kelley, 119 Hilgard Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California A. C. Lane, 22 Arlington Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts C. S. Scofield, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. D. G. Thompson, United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. T. G. Thompson, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Studies on the corrosion of metals and soils have been continued at the National Bureau of Standards and a report of the recent findings was published under the title “Correlation of the electrolytic corrosion test with the active corrosiveness of soils,” by I. A. Denison and R. B. Darnielle [J. Res., Nation. Bur. Stan., No. 21, pp. 819‐830, December, 1938], Another paper on this subject by Kirk H. Logan was published under the title “Engineering significance of National Bureau of Standards soil corrosion data” [J. Res. Nation. Bur. Stan., pp. 109–125, January. 1939].

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Committee on chemistry of natural waters, 1939–40

The membership of this Committee is as follows: I. A. Dennison, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.; C. S. Scofield, Bureau of Plant Industry, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.; D. G. Thompson, United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.; Prof. T. G. Thompson, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and C. S. Howard (Chairman), United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. The Committee arranged for the presentation of the following five papers at the 1940 Spring meeting: (1) Salt‐water intrusion in the Connecticut River, by C. S. Howard, United States Geological Survey; (2) Salinity‐movement and its causes in the Delaware River Estuary, by William D. Mason and Wallace R. Pietsch, Sun Oil Company; (3) Salinity of, lower Savannah River in relation to tidal action and stream‐flow, by William L. Lamar, United States Geological Survey; (4) Corrosion of ferrous and nonferrous metals and the behavior of metallic coatings in tidal marsh, by I. A. Dennison, National Bureau of Standards; (5) The contamination of underground waters by salt water near Parlin, New Jersey, by H. C. Barksdale, United States Geological Survey.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Salt‐water intrusion in the Connecticut River

The intrusion of salt water in the lower Connecticut River Basin was studied during October 1, 1934, to June 30, 1939. The field‐ and laboratory‐work was done as a project of the Works Progress Administration under the sponsorship of the State Water Commission of the State of Connecticut. Some technical assistance was given by the Geological Survey through cooperation with the State Water Commission.

Connecticut↗
USGS2014

Report of committee on the chemistry of natural waters, 1840–41

The membership of the Committee during the past year was as follows: I. A. Dennison. Bureau of Standards; C. S. Scofield, Department of Agriculture; D. G. Thompson, Geological Survey; T. G. Thompson, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and C. S. Howard, United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. (Chairman).

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Report of committee on the chemistry of natural waters, 1941–42

The membership of the Committee during the past year was as follows: I. A. Dennison, National Bureau of Standards; C S. Howard (Chairman), Geological Survey; C. S. Scofield, Department of Agriculture; D. G. Thompson, Geological Survey; and T. G. Thompson, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. SCOFIELD has continued his studies in connection with the salt balance in irrigated areas and has made progress‐reports to interested parties concerning the salt balance on the El Paso Project, Wapato Project, and the Yuma Project. These studies are of great interest to those responsible for the operation of the projects and should be of considerable value to other projects in indicating the volumes of water that may be necessary under certain conditions to insure proper drainage of the project.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Quality of stored water available for use in the lower basin of the Pecos River, Texas

Storage of water in reservoir s may be for (1) irrigation, (2) power‐generation sometimes in connection with releases for irrigation, (3) flood‐control, (4) recreation, or combinations of these four uses. The control of releases of the stored water may involve conflicts of interests as to the best use of the available supply.

Texas, New Mexico↗
USGS2014

Report of Committee on Ground Water, 1943–44

The Chairman extends an apology to G. W. MUSGRAVE for omission of his name from the list of members given in the report of the Committee on Ground Water for 1942–43. The response from members of the Committee in general has been very gratifying and is much appreciated. Four new members, Messrs. H. F. BLANEY, EDWARD BURWELL, Jr., A. N. SAYRE and V. T. STRINGFIELD have been added to the Committee this year, in order to effect better technical and geographic coverage.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union↗
USGS2014

Quality of water in the upper Colorado River basin

In a drainage area as large as the Colorado River Basin there are naturally large differences in the quality of the surface waters. The chemical character of the water at six gaging stations on the Colorado River from near the headwaters to near the mouth is shown by the analyses in Table 1. It will be seen that the concentration of dissolved solids increased from 64 ppm (0.09 tons per ac ft) in the headwaters to 699 ppm (0.95 tons per ac ft) near the mouth.

Colorado↗
USGS2014

Quality of water in the northwest

Abstract The quality of natural waters, as judged by the dissolved mineral content, is quite varied throughout the Northwest. The concentrations of dissolved solids range from less than 50 ppm for many of the surface waters in Washington and Oregon, to several thousand ppm in the alkaline lakes of these states. On the whole, the quality of the natural waters is good but in some areas the waters have become unsatisfactory for many purposes, including irrigation, through contamination with wastes from industrial processes, which may include drainage from irrigated lands.

Oregon, Washington↗
USGS1953

Irrigation and water quality: Part 1--how dissolved solids increase in irrigation water

Do you have water-logged areas and alkali spots on your land? How about similar areas and spots on your neighbor's land upstream? The way water is used upstream from your intake, with the possible exception of that used for power development and navigation, has a great deal to do with the quality of water which reaches your farm. The way you use water on your own farm for irrigation may change the water quality in relatively short stretches of a river. Growing plants require large quantities of water, but as they grow they do not use much of the minerals which are dissolved and carried in irrigation water. As a result, these dissolved solids become concentrated in the water which remains unused. Drainage from unimproved and irrigated areas (as desirable as this may be for the lands drained) will increase the dissolved solids content of the stream into which these drainage waters flow.

The Reclamation ERA↗