Geology Reports⌕ Search

Geology topics

Brenda A. Steele-Mallory

Publications and source records attributed to Brenda A. Steele-Mallory.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Depositional environments of the uranium-bearing Cutler Formations, Lisbon Valley, Utah

The Cutler Formation in Lisbon Valley, San Juan County, Utah, is composed predominantly of fluvial arkosic sandstones, siltstones, shales, and mudstones that were deposited by meandering streams that flowed across a flood plain and tidal flat close to sea level. Two types of channel deposits are recognized from their sedimentary structures: meandering and distributary. The flood plain was occasionally transgressed by a shallow sea from the west, resulting in the deposition of several thin limestones and marine sandstones. The marine sandstones were deposited as longshore bars. Wind transported sand along the shoreline of the shallow sea, forming a coastal dune field. Marine sandstones and eolian sandstones are more common in the upper Cutler in the southern part of the area, whereas in the central and northern part of the area the formation is predominantly fluvial. Crossbed orientation indicates that Cutler streams flowed S. 67? W. on the the average, whereas marine currents moved sediment S. 36? E. and N. 24? W., and wind transported sand S. 800 E. The uranium in the Cutler is found in the central and northern part of the area, in the upper part of the formation, in small fluvial sandstone bodies that were deposited predominantly in a distributary environment. No uranium is known in the marine or eolian sandstones. Petrographically, the uranium-bearing sandstones are identical to other Cutler fluvial sandstones except that they contain less calcite and more clay and are slightly coarser grained. Ore formation has modified the host sandstones very little.

Open-File Report↗

Uranium potential of Permian rocks in the southwestern United States

Evaluation of the uranium potential of Permian rocks in the southwestern United States, between 96° and 112° longitude and 29° and 41° latitude, is being conducted. This area includes central and western parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas; all of Colorado and New Mexico; and eastern parts of Utah and Arizona. The purpose of this evaluation is to select areas that have high uranium potential for basin analysis, and to improve our knowledge of the distribution of uranium in Permian rocks. Paleotectonic elements including basins and positive areas, and stratigraphic sequences lying marginal to these elements were analyzed for uranium potential. Basin analysis factors considered were: source of sediment; sediment dispersal; depositional environments; basin geometry; lithology including organic content; sand-shale ratios, and thickness; regional unconformities; and depth of burial at the present time. Associations between uranium occurrences and basin factors were used to test and modify the approach. Target areas with the highest uranium potential were selected for field reconnaissance. High potential target areas include the following in the mid-continent area: central Oklahoma northward from the Arbuckle Mountains; along the north flanks and between the Arbuckle and Wichita Mountains, and south of the Wichita and Arbuckle Mountains in the Hollis Basin and adjacent areas. Potential host rocks in these target areas are in both the Wolfcamp and Leonard Series. Guadalupe Series rocks northwest of the Arbuckle Mountains in western Oklahoma are also a target. In the Southern Rocky Mountain area the following target areas were outlined: the Central Colorado Trough, the Rowe-Mora Basin in northern New Mexico, and the Uncompahgre Trough of eastern Utah and southwestern Colorado and the associated Permian San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico. From these targets, four areas (including the Uncompahgre Trough, the Central Colorado Basin, western Oklahoma, and the Hollis Basin and adjacent areas) were selected for detailed stratigraphic and depositional environment study.

Open-File Report↗