Avi Goldsmith | Geology Reports

USGS2025

Multi-sensor proximal remote sensing for cover crop biomass estimation at high and moderate spatial resolutions

Cover crops play a critical role in providing agroecological services such as improving soil health, reducing erosion and nitrogen loss, and suppressing weeds, which are closely tied to their performance such as accumulated biomass. This study evaluated the Active Canopy Sensor (ACS) -214, an active proximal sensing device equipped with its own light-emitting red and near-infrared spectral reflectance sensors, a time-of-flight laser, and an ultrasonic sensor, for estimating winter cover crop biomass across 13 U.S. states from 2020 to 2024. We assessed 11 species from three functional groups – grasses ( n = 797), legumes ( n = 264), and brassicas ( n = 181) – using Random Forest (RF) models and four cross-validation strategies. The ACS-214 showed moderate to strong prediction accuracy for grasses ( R 2 = 0.51 – 0.64) and legumes ( R 2 = 0.44 – 0.76), though performance declined in leave-one-region-out analyses ( R 2 = 0.06 – 0.46), indicating limited spatial generalizability. Brassica models had low prediction accuracy for all models ( R 2 < 0.30), likely due to flowering and patchy growth. Biomass prediction breakpoints were observed at ∼3000 kg ha −1 for legumes and ∼4000 kg ha −1 for grasses. We also evaluated the effectiveness of using ACS-214 data to train Sentinel-2 satellite imagery for estimating grass cover crop biomass using withheld, out of bag data from 2023 to 2024. Sentinel-2 RF models trained with ACS-214 data showed good agreement with field-sampled ( R 2 = 0.58 – 0.61) and ACS-214-estimated biomass ( R 2 = 0.70). While Sentinel-2 offers scalability, the ACS-214 enables finer-resolution biomass mapping and better accounts for within-field variability, making it an effective tool for localized management and monitoring. These findings support the integration of proximal and satellite sensing approaches to enhance cover crop biomass estimation and agroecological assessment.

Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland,↗

USGS2022

Integration of satellite-based optical and synthetic aperture radar imagery to estimate winter cover crop performance in cereal grasses

The magnitude of ecosystem services provided by winter cover crops is linked to their performance (i.e., biomass and associated nitrogen content, forage quality, and fractional ground cover), although few studies quantify these characteristics across the landscape. Remote sensing can produce landscape-level assessments of cover crop performance. However, commonly employed optical vegetation indices (VI) saturate, limiting their ability to measure high-biomass cover crops. Contemporary VIs that employ red-edge bands have been shown to be more robust to saturation issues. Additionally, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data have been effective at estimating crop biophysical characteristics, although this has not been demonstrated on winter cover crops. We assessed the integration of optical (Sentinel-2) and SAR (Sentinel-1) imagery to estimate winter cover crops biomass across 27 fields over three winter–spring seasons (2018–2021) in Maryland. We used log-linear models to predict cover crop biomass as a function of 27 VIs and eight SAR metrics. Our results suggest that the integration of the normalized difference red-edge vegetation index (NDVI_RE1; employing Sentinel-2 bands 5 and 8A), combined with SAR interferometric (InSAR) coherence, best estimated the biomass of cereal grass cover crops. However, these results were season- and species-specific (R 2 = 0.74, 0.81, and 0.34; RMSE = 1227, 793, and 776 kg ha −1 , for wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), triticale ( Triticale hexaploide L.), and cereal rye ( Secale cereale ), respectively, in spring (March–May)). Compared to the optical-only model, InSAR coherence improved biomass estimations by 4% in wheat, 5% in triticale, and by 11% in cereal rye. Both optical-only and optical-SAR biomass prediction models exhibited saturation occurring at ~1900 kg ha −1 ; thus, more work is needed to enable accurate biomass estimations past the point of saturation. To address this continued concern, future work could consider the use of weather and climate variables, machine learning models, the integration of proximal sensing and satellite observations, and/or the integration of process-based crop-soil simulation models and remote sensing observations.

Maryland↗