Geology topics

Aggeliki Georgiopoulou

Publications and source records attributed to Aggeliki Georgiopoulou.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2023

Seafloor observations eliminate a landslide as the source of the 1918 Puerto Rico Tsunami

The 11 October 1918 devastating tsunami in northwest Puerto Rico had been used as an example for earthquake‐induced landslide tsunami hazard. Three pieces of evidence pointed to a landslide as the origin of the tsunami: the discovery of a large submarine landslide scar from bathymetry data collected by shipboard high‐resolution multibeam sonar, reported breaks of submarine cable within the scar, and the fit of tsunami models to flooding observations. Newly processed seafloor imagery collected by remotely operated vehicle (ROV) show, however, pervasive Fe–Mn crust (patina) on the landslide walls and floor, indicating that the landslide scar is at least several hundred years old. C 14 "> 14 C dates of sediment covering the landslide floor verify this interpretation. Although we have not searched the region systematically for an alternative tsunami source, we propose a possible source—a two‐segment normal‐fault rupture along the eastern wall of Mona rift. The proposed fault location matches the published normal faults with steep bathymetry and is close to the International Seismological Center–Global Earthquake Model catalog locations of the 1918 mainshock and aftershocks. The ROV observations further show fresh vertical slickensides and rock exposure along the proposed fault trace. Hydrodynamic models from an M w "> M w 7.2 earthquake rupture along the eastern wall of the rift faithfully reproduce the reported tsunami amplitudes, polarities, and arrival times. Our analysis emphasizes the value of close‐up observations and physical samples to augment remote sensing data in natural hazard studies.

Puerto Rico↗

USGS2021

A review of sand detachment in modern deep marine environments: Analogues for upslope stratigraphic traps

Isolated, detached sands provide opportunities for large-volume stratigraphic traps in many deepwater petroleum systems. Here we provide a review of the different types of sandbody detachments based on published data from the modern-day seafloor and recent (generally Quaternary-present), shallow-buried strata. Detachment mechanisms can be classified based on their timing of formation relative to deposition of the detached sandbody as well as their process of formation. Syndepositional detachment mechanisms include flow transformation associated with slope failure (Class 1), turbidity current erosion (Class 2), and contourite deposition (Class 3). Post-depositional detachment is related to subsequent erosive processes and truncation of the pre-existing sandbody, either by submarine channels (Class 4), mass-transport events (Class 5), post-depositional sliding or faulting (Class 6) or bottom currents (Class 7). Examples of each of these mechanisms are identified on the modern seafloor, and show that detached sandbodies can form at different locations along the continental slope and rise (from upper slope to basin floor), and between or within different architectural elements (i.e., canyon, channels and lobes). This variation in formation style results in detached sands of highly variable sizes (tens to hundreds of kilometres) and geometries across and along the depositional profile, which are dependent upon the erosive and/or depositional processes involved, as well as the seafloor topography of the area in question. Whilst modern seafloor systems may not always represent the final stratigraphic architecture in the subsurface, they provide important insights into the development of detached sandbodies and therefore serve as potential analogues for subsurface stratigraphic traps.

Marine and Petroleum Geology↗

USGS2020

Subaqueous mass movements in the context of observations of contemporary slope failure

The consequences of subaqueous landslides have been at the forefront of societal conscience more than ever in the last few years, with devastating and fatal events in the Indonesian Archipelago making global news. The new research presented in this volume demonstrates the breadth of ongoing investigation into subaqueous landslides, and shows that while events like the recent ones can be devastating, they are smaller in scale than those Earth has experienced in the past. Understanding the spectrum of subaqueous landslide processes, and therefore the potential societal impact, requires research across all spatial and temporal scales. This volume delivers a compilation of state-of-the-art papers covering regional landslide databases, advanced techniques for in situ measurements, numerical modelling of processes and hazards.

Book chapter↗

USGS2018

A consistent global approach for the morphometric characterization of subaqueous landslides

Landslides are common in aquatic settings worldwide, from lakes and coastal environments to the deep sea. Fast-moving, large-volume landslides can potentially trigger destructive tsunamis. Landslides damage and disrupt global communication links and other critical marine infrastructure. Landslide deposits act as foci for localized, but important, deep-seafloor biological communities. Under burial, landslide deposits play an important role in a successful petroleum system. While the broad importance of understanding subaqueous landslide processes is evident, a number of important scientific questions have yet to receive the needed attention. Collecting quantitative data is a critical step to addressing questions surrounding subaqueous landslides. Quantitative metrics of subaqueous landslides are routinely recorded, but which ones, and how they are defined, depends on the end-user focus. Differences in focus can inhibit communication of knowledge between communities, and complicate comparative analysis. This study outlines an approach specifically for consistent measurement of subaqueous landslide morphometrics to be used in the design of a broader, global open-source, peer-curated database. Examples from different settings illustrate how the approach can be applied, as well as the difficulties encountered when analysing different landslides and data types. Standardizing data collection for subaqueous landslides should result in more accurate geohazard predictions and resource estimation.

Geological Society, London, Special Publications↗